by Stefan Sharkansky, 03:42 PM
A coalition of Washington state public school advocates, including the historically pro-establishment tax-and-spend League of Education Voters, has filed a charter school initiative for the November ballot. Allowing 40 charter schools over 5 years is tepid in terms of the reforms that the government education monopoly needs to be successful, but it's a step in the right direction.
Washington voters have rejected well-funded charter schools initiatives and referenda in the recent past, so I wouldn't bet on the outcome, but will be rooting for it.
Mitt Romney launched a blistering attack Wednesday on President Barack Obama and teachers unions, saying they're blocking crucial revisions to education and are hurting children, particularly young Hispanics and other minorities.Good."This is the civil rights issue of our time," Romney said. "President Obama has been unable to stand up to union bosses and unwilling to stand up for kids."
...
[Romney] proposed a series of changes, including greater choice in public education, more charter schools and digital learning, and a one-two punch of less job security for poor teachers and higher pay for better ones.
Permalink | Comments (9) | Email This
by Stefan Sharkansky, 08:32 AM
"Seattle firefighter caught with meth still being paid, faces new charge"
A Seattle firefighter recently convicted on a drug charge is now accused of violating a protection order secured by a former girlfriend - and remains on the fire department payroll.Remember this the next time the firefighters' union asks us to approve a tax increase for fire services.The new charges filed Monday against firefighter Paul Hermosillo came less than a month after the 34-year-old pleaded guilty to a drug crime related to his arrest last year on the University of Washington campus. Hermosillo was caught with methamphetamine while having consensual sex near a campus fountain. ... He remains on the department payroll despite the misdemeanor drug conviction.
Permalink | Comments (14) | Email This
by Jim Miller, 02:33 PM
After reading that very interesting letter from Professor Radnitz, I thought some of you might like to read this old post of mine.
(And I suppose I should add that the old post is just an appetizer. I have much more for you on Republicans and education, but will not promise to deliver it soon.)
Permalink | Comments (22) | Email This
by Stefan Sharkansky, 03:22 PM
A letter to the editor in this week's The Economist:
... one thing we can objectively assess is the likely effect of the Republican Party's policies if put into action: a government that does not invest in education, or roads, does nothing to prevent monopolies, protect the environment, ensure minorities' civil rights, or assist the poor and elderly with health care.(Emphasis mine).I teach a course on failed states, and the logical consequences of the right's vision resemble Russia in the early 1990s or much of sub-Saharan Africa today. Grover Norquist might fare well in this world, but for those who value the virtues of a modern democratic society, the think-tankers are right to challenge the fiction of the "freedom-trampling" federal government.
The writer: Scott Radnitz, Assistant professor of international studies, University of Washington, Seattle
If I were among the eminent scholars affiliated with the UW Jackson School for International Studies, I'd be embarrassed to have that institution's name attached to the hysterical, unscholarly idiocy expressed in Radnitz's letter.
Permalink | Comments (35) | Email This
by Jim Miller, 08:50 AM
As far as I can tell, almost none of the voters in that San Francisco district miss Jay Inslee, though I suppose the senior 8th district congresswoman, Nancy Pelosi, may.
In the 111th Congress, Jay inslee voted with his party leadership, that is to say, Nancy Pelosi, 99 per cent of the time. He had decided, for whatever reasons, to follow her lead, to become a junior congressman representing her district, rather than represent Washington's 1st district.
If any of our local reporters think that Inslee's record is a legitimate issue in the governor's race, they may want to ask him why he spent that session of Congress representing San Francisco, rather than Bainbridge Island, Shoreline, Edmonds, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Bothell, Kirkland, and Redmond.
And if they are really enterprising, they may want to ask him whether he voted for Pelosi in the last leadership contest, and, if so, why. (The votes in these leadership contests are secret, but we know that Heath Schuler received 43 votes. Was one of those Inslee's?)
The current Almanac of American Politics has just two brief paragraphs on Inslee's accomplishments, but there is still enough there for reporters to begin asking him questions. If, that is, they think questions about his record are legitimate.
Cross posted at Jim Miller on Politics
.Permalink | Comments (50) | Email This
by Jim Miller, 01:26 PM
The Obama administration is planning to bankrupt the country. That isn't just what Republican partisans say, that's what their own numbers say. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner admitted that the administration has no plan to avoid bankruptcy — but says that he doesn't like the Republican plans he has seen. (I'm not sure what his position is on the bipartisan Bowles-Simpson plan, but we do know that President Obama has, almost entirely, ignored it.)
For more than three years now, the Senate Democratic leadership, including our own senior senator, Patty Murray, has refused to even present a budget resolution — as required by law.
Since the Republican takeover of the House in the 2010 election, the Republican majority has presented a budget plan that would, according to official estimates, let us avoid national bankruptcy. The Ryan plan may not be perfect — unlike all the other plans — but it should have been a place to start serious negotiations.
Instead, President Obama has, after one failed attempt to negotiate a grand bargain with the Republicans, gone back to nearly full-time campaigning. Anyone who looks at his daily schedules, as I do from time to time, will notice that he rarely even meets with congressional leaders, much less spends the time necessary to work out a compromise. I have my disagreements will all four of Obama's immediate predecessors, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2, but all of them were willing to try to achieve compromises on budgets, and all of them succeeded, to some extent.
President Obama is not even willing to try.
So who does the Seattle Times attack? Speaker Boehner.
That editorial attack is simply bizarre.
Cross posted at Jim Miller on Politics.
(There are also several budget plans from Republican senators, two of them serious enough to get more than 40 votes in the Senate. To the best of my knowledge, no Democratic leader in the Senate — including our own Patty Murray — has even presented a budget plan in the last three years.)
Note to would-be commenters: I've closed this post because I am going to ask the Times editorial board for a reply. But I will have an open post on our national budget problems for you, soon.
Permalink | Email This

