February 16, 2005
Voter Registration Challenge Hearing

I filed a formal challenge to the voter registration of Dr. Daniel Sosin, the Atlanta, GA resident who continues to vote absentee in Seattle 12 years after he left town.

A formal challenge hearing will be held before King County election director Dean Logan, this Friday, February 18 at 10am, in the Maynard Room (2nd floor) of the King County Administration Building, 500 4th Ave, Seattle.

When I first reported this case (in the blog post linked above), some readers opined that Dr. Sosin's status as a federal employee should permit him to maintain a voting residence in WA state. That provision may be used by some federal employees, but it is not without limits. In this particular case, I have found additional evidence that I believe demonstrates pretty convincingly that Dr. Sosin is not a bona fide resident of Seattle or Washington State. I'll present that information at the hearing. The decision whether to cancel Dr. Sosin's registration rests with Dean Logan.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at February 16, 2005 12:33 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Did the good Doctor also vote in GA? Did he "double vote"? Inquiring minds want to know!!! JCH

Posted by: JCH on February 16, 2005 01:08 PM
2. Stefan--
This is important to see exactly what standards KingCo will use in allowing Voter Registrations to be successfully challenged.
Is the Doctor actually contesting your challenge?

Since I know nothing firsthand about the Doctors situation, I will not comment on that.

Hoever, in general, I believe we will ultimately find quite a few nonresidents that use Washington as their State of Residence to avoid (or yes perhaps even Evade) taxes in the State they truly reside in.

I also think we will see lots of inconsistencies in what constitutes residency when we compare states requirements.

We will also see plenty of College Students that voted out of state where their parents live or where they previously resided AND in Washington. That said, if they are going to school here or living here full-time, the Washington residency may be legit.

This is a Rat's nest that has gotten pretty screwed up because of no National Voter Registration database OR use of SS #'s to help avoid duplicate registrations.

We will be talking about this stuff up to and beyond if their is a re-registration. We must be more vigiliant.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on February 16, 2005 01:24 PM
3. Yes, and inquiring minds would also like to know how he could be using an address of 'residency' for 12 years and not really reside there? Did he live there at one time and never bother to change the records? How many more of these 'residents' do we have on the rolls?

Dean Logan could also find out from the State of Georgia elections officials if he did vote in that state.

Let us know the results of the hearing and if Dean Logan considers this 'Washingtonian'? legal.

Posted by: Susu on February 16, 2005 01:31 PM
4. This is a perfect example why the SoS should make the birth dates available with the voter registration data. If ferreting out illegal voters is going to fall to the voters themselves, then we need that information. See the Dekalb county voter lookup page, and notice how easy it would be to find out if Dr. Sosin is registered there if we simply knew his birth date:

https://dklbweb.dekalbga.org/voter/locator.asp

Posted by: Jason on February 16, 2005 01:48 PM
5. Using your database, I believe that many people are registered at a "Mailpost" type place down the street from me. Since I'm not in a position to do these kinds of court challenges, can I just call KC and give them the address of this place and trust them to figure it out? Or what else could I do?

Posted by: Michele S on February 16, 2005 02:00 PM
6. michele S--
There is a formal process for challenging that has been outlined here repeatedly.
You need to look at their residence address.
If they don't live there, then you have to find out WHERE they do live. Sometimes its a matter of a couple phone calls. Call KingCo to get the Challenge Voter Registration Form and review it.
Calling KingCo with this does NO GOOD.
Michele S--we are going to have to get off our butts and do some work here if we want to clean this up. I have no idea why you can't do it...but you can make some phone calls to see where these folks might live, can't you?
THIS IS THE PROBLEM!!!
If people won't step up and follow thru, why are they wasting time looking at these lists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry michele...I'm very frustrated that others aren't willing to actually follow thru. Please try a few and see what happens.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on February 16, 2005 02:14 PM
7. Jason,

I'm pretty sure he is not registered in that county. I checked that page for all birth dates between 1940 and 1980. He could be registered elsewhere...I could be wrong..etc.

Posted by: VaCSProf on February 16, 2005 02:17 PM
8. Dr. Sosin is NOT registered to vote in DeKalb County, GA, which is where his home is located.

Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky on February 16, 2005 02:28 PM
9. If the last few months has demonstrated anything, it's that Stefan will have his ducks in a row, and we will find out when it's appropriate.

Posted by: South County on February 16, 2005 02:29 PM
10. Voter registration ... the millenniums first witch hunt ... I mean red scare. Go get 'em sharky.

Maybe the good Doctor feels in affinity to Seattle and still THINKS of the Pacific Northwest as home.

If you minded your own business you wouldn't be minding mine.

Posted by: Doc on February 16, 2005 02:37 PM
11. VaCSProf,

I suppose with a name like that it isn't surprising that you were able to check over 14,600 possible dates. Of course I'm assuming you scripted it, rather than sat down with a big bag of popcorn one day and started clicking :-)

So if he isn't registered there, but he is registered here, I'm assuming there is some other twist to this that Stefan will reveal come Friday morning.

Best to let that process work it's way through without the rest of us trying to dig up dirt on Dr. Sosin, least this turn into a witch hunt.

Posted by: Jason on February 16, 2005 02:37 PM
12. PLEASE go to the web site below and take the election reform survey.

www.governor.wa.gov/electionreform/form.htm

Posted by: chardonnay on February 16, 2005 02:41 PM
13. Mr. Cynical, before you get your underwear in a bunch, just know that some of us are less able to attend hearings than others for a variety of reasons. But we do what we can when we can.

Posted by: Michele S on February 16, 2005 02:43 PM
14. 'Maybe the good Doctor feels an affinity to Seattle and still thinks of the Northwest as his home'

I know a good troll when I read one!

I also 'left my heart in San Francisco' but I'm not a LEGAL resident of the state of CA, so I will not vote there.

Posted by: Susu on February 16, 2005 02:48 PM
15. Does anyone think it is somewhat humorous that Senator Pam Roachclip has a son who is a drug trafficker? James Dobson would not be happy with her "family values." Why has soundpolitics not started a post on this topic? We need to get to the bottom of this story and find out what happened. I see little blogging on this topic. I saw a bumper sticker the other day that said "focus on your own damn family." What a concept.

Posted by: marshall smith on February 16, 2005 02:53 PM
16. MS, her son is a 24-year-old Man being held responsible for his own actions, which is more than I can say for the elections officals in King County.

Posted by: Terry, Clark C on February 16, 2005 03:03 PM
17. Way to go. I'm sure there are another 128 Dr. Sosin like voters that voted in November 2004 as well. Dems @ the HorsesAss.org will dismiss this as a witch hunt, even though the formal process for challenging bogus registrations is exactly what Stefan is doing, or they will say that the time to do this is in the next election, etc.

There should be no doubt in anyone's mind, even that of a delusional Democrat, that this election result is unknown. Only a Democrat would try and spin this in a frantic attempt to keep Gregoire in office. If it had been the other way around, Rossi would have done the right thing and requested another election.

To a Democrat, the only thing that matters is power in the present. There will be no forward thinking as to what Gregoire's perceived illegitimacy holds for the future of WA Democrats. They operate like meth heads who have just robbed a house to score their next fix. No matter the future consequences, just get the drugs of power and statism into their Democrat veins, ASAP.

Posted by: Jeff B. on February 16, 2005 03:07 PM
18. Humorous???? Hardly!! How could anyone think that someone's son being a drug traffiker is humorous? It's sad for any parent to have a son/daughter mixed up in drugs. I feel for them.

You must not be a parent.

Anyway, what does that have to do with the Dr. in Atlanta and illegal voting?

Posted by: Susu on February 16, 2005 03:10 PM
19. Marshall,

There are a million great causes that could and should be blogged on. Just because your favorite issue isn't getting the attention you think it deserves on this blog doesn't mean that this topic is any less worthy. Start your own blog if you feel that strongly. It's simple to do, and generally free.

Posted by: Jason on February 16, 2005 03:11 PM
20. TVW this week on Inside Olympia: Election Reform

With host Dave Ammons talks with Election Reform Task Force Co-Chairs
Sam Reed, Betty Sheldon, Jim Kastama

This will air:
Thurs. 17th at 7 and 11pm
Saturday 19th at 10pm
Sunday at 20th at 10am and 7pm

Posted by: Terry, Clark C on February 16, 2005 03:16 PM
21. Jeff B~

You're wrong about a lot of things. I'm a Dem and I applaud Stefan's efforts on the registration front. I think the registration process statewide and nationwide can use revamping. I don't think this is the most important issue facing our state or our country, but it is one that deserves attention.

I don't think this is an attempt to keep Governor Gregoire in office. I think this has nothing to do with Governor Gregoire's status.

And lastly, I may be delusional, but I do know that the result of the election is known--Christine Gregoire won. Here's the proof--

http://governor.wa.gov/

And the sun keeps coming up...go figure.

Posted by: Steve on February 16, 2005 03:24 PM
22. We need to get to the bottom of this story and find out what happened.

Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

Posted by: South County on February 16, 2005 03:26 PM
23. The process of challenging a voter registration may be effective, but I'm concerned that the results won't last. So long as Dean Logan's attitude is "as long as the registration card is filled out correctly I have to let them register" means that people can re-register before the next election and be back on the voter rolls even if they are not legitimate.

Alan

Posted by: Alan on February 16, 2005 03:27 PM
24. Chardonnay,

Thanks for the link, I had no idea they were talking a poll. Interesting thing is, it looks like it was written with input from this site. My two addition suggestions where:

If after all recounts are complete, and the margin of victory for any contest is less than the margin of error for the voting method used, a revote for that contest should be ordered.

Electronic voting machines that provide paper reciepts should be used statewide, along with a SoS run website that allows any voter to check that their vote was counted correctly by entering a PIN/Password combination to see the results of their vote, which they can then compare with the paper reciept they recieved from the machine.

Posted by: Jason on February 16, 2005 03:29 PM
25. HorsesAss.ORG Take a stroll over and post away! Was it Blondie who said, "Hit me with your best shot!"? Well, hit them hard, and often!! JCH

Posted by: JCH on February 16, 2005 03:52 PM
26. Can't wait to hear Betti Sheldon. She is the Patty Murray of former state legislators. Several years ago when my oldest was working at video store in Bremerton after classes, Betti was on a no-check list because she Bounced too many checks. Betti Sheldon, a truly Rostenkowski style dimocRAT.

Posted by: Robert in Kitsap on February 16, 2005 04:04 PM
27. Jason,

Lets just say I had a lot of popcorn, but got full before I checked any other county...no witch hunt here...but I can't wait for the twist. I think there's a hint in Stefan's statement "Dr. Sosin is NOT registered to vote in DeKalb County, GA, which is where his home is located."

Posted by: VaCSProf on February 16, 2005 04:45 PM
28. Well, we know from his resume that he has worked in Frankfort, Kentucky. And we know that he got a B.S. in Biology from the University of Michigan which is in Ann Arbor, MI. And he got his M.D. from Yale, which is in New Haven,
Connecticut. And of course the time spent at the University of Washington. So my guess is that he may be registered to vote in any of those locations, but chooses not to register at his home, in case any of those remote locations should actually check to see if he is registered at his mailing address as well. The sad thing is, even if all of this is true, which I doubt, what would happen to him? Likely nothing, since none of the jurisdictions where he is allegedly illegally registered to vote would be able to prosecute him across state lines, and they certainly aren't going to extradite over something like this.

Posted by: Jason on February 16, 2005 05:07 PM
29. I hope the good doctor sues your sorry ass after you loose your challange. Really sad that you have now descended into cyber stalking.

Posted by: JOhn on February 16, 2005 05:44 PM
30. ::fixes JOhn's wee error::

challange = challenge loose = lose


::snicker:::

Posted by: Jim L on February 16, 2005 05:53 PM
31. ::fixes JOhn's wee error::

challange = challenge loose = lose


::snicker:::

Posted by: Jim L on February 16, 2005 05:53 PM
32. John, the Doctor won't win as Stefan is following the intent of the law. You can't be sued for following the intent of the law, only for malfeasance, malpractice, damages, or harm. None of which happened here.

Posted by: Mark Beyer on February 16, 2005 06:15 PM
33. John another thing
Gregoire's statement on the governor's website "We can leave our legacy to future generations only if we are willing to change - to go beyond partisan labels, and to solve the problems facing Washingtonians"

Easy words, lets see her cross the aisle and seek the solutions necessary to fix the problems we see discussed here on this blog. So far she has done everything necessary to not fix these issues and maintain the status quo. Lets see her do the right thing for once since she took a public office. Lets see her lead a non-partisan vote to restore the public faith in elections by seeking reform and vacating the office to force a new vote.

Posted by: Mark Beyer on February 16, 2005 06:25 PM
34. Well, one thing is for sure. The good doctor is famous now. Probably more than he wishes!

Posted by: Dan on February 16, 2005 06:36 PM
35. SS will have to do more than be "pretty concvincing". The legal standard established in RCW 29A.08.820 is "clear and convincing evidence" This establishes a standard of proof falling somewhere between the traditional civil standard of "preponderance of the evidence" and the criminal "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Posted by: dpk on February 16, 2005 06:42 PM
36. Thanks for pointing out the online survey!

Posted by: sgmmac on February 16, 2005 07:07 PM
37. I hope for meaningful elections reform, but I can see the writing on the wall. The only lessons learned by the WA-MOB is that they need to cover their tracks better. "Reforms" such as Senate Bill 5744 / House Bill 1754 will do just that. If you wonder if 5744/1754 will protect your vote, here are the sponsors:

Senators
Haugen --D
Berkey --D
Fairley --D
Sheldon --D

Representatives
Hunt --D
Nixon --R
McDermott --D
Haigh --D

And here are a few more fans of 5744/1754:

Sam Reed (Secretary of State), Shane Hamlin (publications manager Secretary of State's Office), Katie Blinn (office of Program Research), Kim Wyman (auditor of Thurston County), Pat McCarthy (auditor of Pierce County), Bob Terwilliger (auditor of Snohomish County), Chris Stegman (officer in the Green Party of Washington)

Are these people protecting the voters, or themselves?

This Bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Oh yeah, it will result in a "smoother election process", because "irregularities" will happen behind closed doors and officials will have more time to "correct" mistakes. Think about it!

Posted by: Splatter on February 16, 2005 08:19 PM
38. We left San Rafael, California in 1977, but voted there until 1998, even while living in Alexandria, VA; Brussels, Belgium; New Delhi, India; and Manila, Philippines. This is not untypical for personnel working for the US Govt., both military and civilian.

Posted by: Peter Rice on February 16, 2005 08:28 PM
39. PR, you have every right to do that if you are sent there under certain conditions, such as the military or by the requirements of your government position. What is wrong is if you live there as a permanent resident buying a home or registering a vehicle or business there. Basically, if you violate their residency laws for voting, taxes, or licensing. What the military has told us is that you maintain your residency for the state you have your drivers license as it has mil in its expiration date. When you buy a home in another state they often recommend you change locations.

Posted by: Mark Beyer on February 16, 2005 09:53 PM
40. Peter,

That's a valid point. I left Oregon in 1987 and continued to vote there through 1999, even though I lived in Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, Georgia, and Germany. Thing is though, I voted in Oregon because I was from Oregon, I had ties to Oregon, when I was on leave I would go "home" to Oregon. There is no indication that the good doctor has any lasting ties to Washington other than he recieved his advanced degree here.

This could all have a very reasonable and perfectly legal explanation. However absent knowing what that is, are we to simply nod and say "Well ok, the Doctor must have a good reason for continuing to vote in this state, but we don't need to bother with specifics."

Seriously, if that's what we are going to do, why bother having any registration laws or reguirements at all. Lets invite all the good folks from Vancouver B.C. down here for our next election and let them have a go at it too.

It is absolutely hypocritical to claim to want clean elections and election reform, but then scoff at any attempts to actually clean up the voter roles, or as in this case, at least investigate what appears to be a very questionable voter.

No one is talking about turning this man's life upside down, no one is talking about stalking him. All of the information about him that has been discusssed thus far is freely available by simple Google search. He is a well respected man in his field, which is why his resume and details of his life are so plentiful on various websites. What isn't available is why he, as a homeowner in and apparent resident of Georgia for the last decade, has been continuing to vote in this state.

Posted by: Jason on February 16, 2005 10:07 PM
41. Mark Beyer, it is clear that Fraudoire has no intention of initiating any kind of "reforms", other than those that assure the ability to continue the fraud and cheating. This "Electoral Reform" commission is a sham, something just for show, to impress people with the "see, we're doing something" routine. It is to Sam Reed's discredit that he agreed to be Fraudoire's Commissar, and thereby lending credibility to this scam. If he had any guts, Reed would have told Fraudoire to stick it where the sun don't shine. As it is, people are actually buying into the lie that this showboat of a commission will make a difference.

Posted by: Interested Observer on February 17, 2005 05:38 AM
42. Anyone who expects the "Electoral Reform" commission to be anything other than a sham is wasting their time. If you want a clear picture of what the result will be you need look no further than the 'conclusions' drawn in the Washington State Patrol's 'investigation' of the Brame affair. The depth of political filth and out and out corruption in this State knows no bounds and permeates every State department and agency.

Posted by: JDH on February 17, 2005 09:09 AM
43. Not trying to defend the doctor, but my father owns property (and a home) in Florida, as well as property (and a home) here in Washington. He lives varied times between the two homes, has a Florida drivers license, and votes in Florida. Going strictly by the law, he would be bouning his license and registration a couple of times a year...

Posted by: Chuck on February 17, 2005 10:01 AM
44. Ok, this is a little sad. Chuck's comments about his father inspired me to lookup what the requirements are to become a Washington State Resident. The first place I looked seems to present us with a loop, or cicular logic:

http://access.wa.gov/living/resources/residency.aspx

It says that to become a resident, you simply need to say that you want to be a resident, and then take some action to prove it. Among the listed actions is registering to vote. Never mind that you have to be a resident to register to vote.

So the logic goes like this:

If you want to vote, you need to be a resident

If you want to be a resident, just register to vote

Good grief, no wonder we're in such a mess.

Posted by: Jason on February 17, 2005 01:27 PM
45. There really are some legitimate exceptions. For instance, RV full-timers who have ties to this state but have sold their residence here and are living in their RVs in many parts of the country.

I have some good friends who have been doing so for nearly three years. They get their mail at a mail-box facility in their former community and have it forwarded to wherever they are at various times. They are back in WA in the summers, but hardly ever in November.

Posted by: Ann in Issaquah on February 17, 2005 03:14 PM
46. Since the Doctor is the example, what about his drivers license, vehicle license, the state he claims for income tax, medical board certification, business licensing, or other state requirements of his profession?

Posted by: Mark Beyer on February 17, 2005 06:05 PM
47. So - what was the outcome?

Posted by: TJ on February 18, 2005 11:28 AM
48. I've been periodically refreshing this page as well, looking for news of the outcome. I'm not sure how long these things take, but the hearing was only scheduled to start 2.5 hours ago, so it's probably a bit soon to be looking for all the details.

Posted by: Jason on February 18, 2005 12:24 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?