March 31, 2005
Snohos

Snohomish High School suspended a teenager for wearing a "Snohos" T-shirt

when Snohomish High senior Justin Patrick wore a T-shirt to school last month with the lettering "SNOHOS" across the front, it led to his suspension from school.

School officials say "Snohos" contains a slang term for prostitutes and is derogatory toward women.

By extension, we can assume that the Snohomish High career counselers will be forbidden from taking about jobs in hospitals, chemistry teachers will redact Phosphorous out of the periodic table, and the orchestra will no longer perform works of Shostakovich.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 31, 2005 09:53 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Are there that many prostitutes or women who look like prostitutes at the school to be offended by an S at the end of the football team name? If so, they should immediately begin renaming all schools in Washington to numbers like they do in Russia so as to not offend any other special interest.

After all "Snohomians" could sound like a 'gay' slang.

I feel more confident every day that I'll be home schooling my children. I'll consolidate just 45 minutes a day to learning and they'll still be ahead of the public school system.

Posted by: Andy on March 31, 2005 10:13 AM
2. One phrase popular on sweatshirts in 1968, the year I graduated from Wilson HS, Tacoma, was "I812" but nobody got in any trouble for that. Back then common coutesy would have never been permitted to give way to the yet unknown phrase "political correctness".

Posted by: Brad P. on March 31, 2005 10:13 AM
3. Where is the ACLU when you need it.

Ooops, sorry, this isn't offensive to Christians.

Posted by: Fred on March 31, 2005 10:18 AM
4. I had to turn a Circle Jerks T-shirt inside out in high school, but at least they allowed us to smoke outside.

Posted by: CandrewB on March 31, 2005 10:21 AM
5. How about my class of '69, we were the 69'ers.!?

Posted by: Son of Liberty on March 31, 2005 10:23 AM
6. Stefan,

You should've let this one go. We don't know enough about this situation. I personally would like to congratulate the principal for taking a principled stance. Yes, the students may interpret "SNOHOS" as slang. I think the principal was in a better position to make that decision than anyone else.

We need more proactive principals like this one, and teachers as well. I personally would like to see the dress code enforce at our schools in Federal Way. As it is, too many people dress like prostitutes and nothing is done about it.

Posted by: Jonathan Gardner on March 31, 2005 10:36 AM
7. Andy,
You'll do your kids a great service keeping them out of the "guv'mint edjumication mill." It was our experience with the Snohomish Schools in 1992 that convinced us to keep our kids in private school. Our kids are ahead of their peers because they focus on reading, writing and arithmetic, and don't get distracted with PC baloney.

Posted by: Mark on March 31, 2005 10:42 AM
8. I don't know what I think about this particular issue. It's pretty easy to have a knee-jerk reaction. The underlying question is this-- does a school have the right to put parameters on dress and behavior? Freedom isn't the right to do whatever you want-- that's anarchy. And we are talking about minors here, not legal-age adults.

Posted by: Marty on March 31, 2005 10:42 AM
9. I'm all for school uniforms, or at least a dress code, but absent that, and without knowing any other facts of the case, my gut reaction is that a suspension for this was too harsh. In my opinion, the more appropriate action would be to send the student home with a letter explaining why the shirt wasn't appropriate, and asking that the student return to school in different attire.

Posted by: Jason on March 31, 2005 10:54 AM
10. "Snohomish High" has the singular of the same term within it. When is the tribe responsible for naming the river going to be sued for using a disrespectful term IN A DIFFERENT LANGUAGE. Merde.

BTW "Ron Sims" is an amazingly offensive term in Klingon, let's sue.

Posted by: Al on March 31, 2005 11:23 AM
11. Andy--

The public schools in New York City are numbered. It figures.

I went to PS 26 and JHS 82 in the Bronx, but that didn't keep me from becoming the hidebound right-wing reactionary I am today.

Posted by: Howard Hirsch on March 31, 2005 11:23 AM
12. Boy - back in the dark ages (1964) NO one wore any kind of name or logo on any article of clothing -- the only exceptions -- was the little bitty aligator trademark that was on some boys' shirts and the 'KEDS' logos on the very moderately (and realistically) priced gym shoes that NO ONE wore outside of gym class - if you were over the age of about ten. Oh Yes -- ya had to write your last name in big letters on the front of your tee shirt for gym class - lotso fun when some bozo put it on inside out- bozo >> ozob.
We sure were deprived of the sophistication of being walking billboards for offshore clothing mfrs/shoe mfrs/sports teams/ restaurants/political causes(mostly PC) -- etc etc -- boy if someone showed up with an article of clothing with some message or advert logo -- they woulda been so harrassed -- they woulda had to go home to change -- what a bunch of crap the PS systems have degenerated too -- too damn much "over-educrapping" of the teachers.

Posted by: Bill on March 31, 2005 11:48 AM
13. The joys of living in a PC (pure crap) world - 'scuse the French...

Sorry for the lack of PC in the gala-phobic expression!

Posted by: Fred on March 31, 2005 12:01 PM
14. And that spokeswoman Shannon Parthemer; I mean, come on--"part"? I think we all know what SHE'S talkin' 'bout on the sly...

Posted by: Jeff H on March 31, 2005 12:04 PM
15. More power to SnoHos!

Posted by: Patrick E. Bell on March 31, 2005 12:05 PM
16. I sense an opportunity here. An enterprising T-shirt shop could make a bunch of "Shohos" shirts and sell them to students wishing to show their school spirit!

Posted by: Touchstone on March 31, 2005 12:16 PM
17. The school has the right to restrict what the kids where to school, especially if it disrupts the class room environment. Hopefully, the majority of the girls in SHS aren't behaving in such a fashion. I wouldn't be too surprised though these days.

Posted by: Tom on March 31, 2005 12:21 PM
18. Howard, I went to PS 189 but my Jr. High and High School had names. It's not universal throughout the city. (Winthrop, Bklyn Tech, Stuyvesant, etc.)
As for this group, according to the article there was a name allowed (some of the staff used it if I recall correctly) that was SNOHO so the main arguement here is that they're not consistent. You can't have selective enforcement. Well, obviously that's wrong - they do.

Posted by: Paladin on March 31, 2005 01:00 PM
19. I find this "SNOHOS" issues fascinating since I recall knowing a Snohomish Count y prosecutor with the licanse plate "SNOHO LAW." This is clearly more political correctness run-amuck. Enough already!

Posted by: Dave Sharpless on March 31, 2005 01:22 PM
20. Be sure to read the original article. I support the right of schools to enforce dress codes, but they overreacted here.

Make him cover it up and promise not to wear again? Yes. Suspension for blowing up at the school official? Probably appropriate. But a one-day suspension for "sexual harassment" for a t-shirt containing a word used throughout yearbooks and other school materials? Insane.

My son was suspended Tuesday for hitting another boy on the playground, after the boy (a notorious bully) had tripped him and grabbed onto his leg. No one was hurt or crying. My son is 5 yrs old and special ed, but we "just can't have aggressive behavior". More accurately, we can't have boys who act like 5-yr-old boys.

Need more reasons not to send your kid to public school?

Posted by: Bill on March 31, 2005 01:23 PM
21. per the earlier comment on home school. I know there a lot of nut jobs that homeschool their kids ie people with no higher ed and their kids have no 'desire' to learn etc.

Besides the collosal waste of time on non learning activities. Anyone in the biz community can recognize that schools fundamentally teach kids to be 'worker bees' and entitlement minded. Any leadership characteristic is BEAT out of them at a young age and challenging authority is not ok- unless it's both left wing and staff sponsored.

Kids are not taught to take ownership of their own success; if they fail they are taught that it really wasn't their own fault and something or someone else is to blame (and the state didn't throw enough money at the problem). In the real world- where does this mentality get you? "My business failed and it was someone else's fault??" Rich Dad, Poor Dad just hasn't made it's way into the curricula.

If you talk to any high school or college student- they want to 'get a good job'- they are not thinking about starting a business, creating jobs, creating wealth, or revolutionizing an industry or field.

Nah- The good jobs the public school kids will be applying for will be at my kids' business. At least the public school kids will all belong to the same labor union when my kid ships those jobs over to china.

Posted by: Andy on March 31, 2005 01:48 PM
22. Paladin,

All of the high schools in NY have always had names (mostly after US presidents), and the elementary schools numbers. My junior high, 82, was also named Macombs JHS.

I would point out, however, that my original comment to Andy did not address the merits of the present case. I do agree with you that those kids were doing nothing wrong (Snohos in a county called Snohomish??? Give me a break!!!), but in the pussified State of Washington these days the right of freedom of expression must give way to the right of the most sensitive individual not to have her feelings hurt.

In 1968 the US Supreme Court ruled otherwise in Tinker vs. Des Moines School District, upholding the right of students to wear black armbands to school to protest the War in Vietnam. I guess today now that the other side is in control, such expressions are no longer permissible--no matter what the Supreme Court said.

Posted by: Howard Hirsch on March 31, 2005 01:59 PM
23. Why wouldn't they apply to your business Andy?

Posted by: CandrewB on March 31, 2005 02:36 PM
24. Howard: I don't remember my Jr. High having anything but a name. It might have had a number but nobody ever used it. (I'll have to check with my sister.)
This is another instance of political correctness run to the absurd. When are we going to scream enough and put a stop to it?
(Oh, my family and friends back there think I'm a raving lunatic because I rejected their left-wing brainwashing.)

Posted by: Paladin on March 31, 2005 03:08 PM
25. Candrew-
It won't be my biz then, I have to sell it or pass it on early. If I wait until I die, the state will take it.

Afterall, when I die, it's not my money anymore is it.

Posted by: Andy on March 31, 2005 04:19 PM
26. Oh I think you will be around then, unless you smoke or don't exercise of course.

Please try and refrain from shaming people for working for someone else. I would love to start my own business but, and as you've stated...

"When I embark on an entreprenierial venture, I work for free for the first 1-5 years. No vacations, no sick days, no pay at all and risk losing everything."

I cannot figure out a way to accomplish this without losing the house, health insurance and getting a divorce. Interested in making an investment?

And what do you do where you cannot find high school grads to work for forty grand, bullet-proof-vest tester?


Posted by: CandrewB on March 31, 2005 04:34 PM
27. So let me get this straight... "Snoho" is acceptable, but "Snohos" isn't?

I guess it's ok to have one "Ho", but if you've got a whole bunch a' "Hos", that's "politically incorrect"?

What's the world coming to when you can't have all the "Hos" you want?

Soon, History teachers will not be able to teach students about the "Holocaust", the Cheerleaders will not be able to wear panythose or any other form of hosiery. And the news won't even be able to mention or troops "coming under Hos"-tile fire, because it explicitly describes a sex act with a prostitute.

And, I guess any mention of Santa Claus is wrong... "Ho Ho Ho", which by this logic would be interpreted as a pimp counting his girls!

Jeez, somebody shoot me in the head! (Uh-Oh, the word "shoot" contains a slang term for a prostitute... sorry! Please don't suspend me from the group.)


Posted by: Clint on March 31, 2005 04:51 PM
28. Candrew-

I can afford to start my own business, because I cannot afford not to. That is why I shame others and myself for working for da man and then complaining when their job is gone. I'm a big fan of Rich Dad Poor Dad, MND etc. I've deferred my gratification in order to do so. That said, would the government please keep their hands out of my pockets so I could achieve this goal?

I have a day job too, but as the dems are one tax away from driving that job out of state, I cannot afford not to have an exit strategy. Is this mentality taught in school? no- in fact I look at my nephews and nieces and they believe they are entitled to insane wages and have no concept of responsibility/risk. The best thing their parents ever did was force them to work outside of the family biz, so they get a feel for hard knocks.

As per starting a biz- start small and make sure you and your spouse are not on different pages financially. Be disciplined about growing and how you invest in it. I have an MBA and all of that neat stuff, but Rich Dad Poor Dad, a divorce, and seeing a ton of layoffs taught me the value of owning my own biz and becoming financially independent.

None of this is taught in schools. Does an 18 year old male understand the financial and legal ramifications of knocking up a 'snoho'? No- but he'll pay 3/4 million to DSHS over the next 20 years in support and legal fees for that mistake- lot of good a bananna and condom do.

Posted by: Andy on March 31, 2005 05:48 PM
29. Are students suspended for eating "HOHOs" at school too?

Posted by: Nick on April 1, 2005 01:40 AM
30. Nick - Yes, and there are two reasons:

1 - demeaning to females
2 - too much religion, it is what Santa Claus says

Take your pick!

Posted by: Fred on April 1, 2005 07:53 AM
31. Many years ago I suggested to a feminist that we should get rid of all sexist terminology in English by replacing all occurrences of "he" with the gender-neutral "it", and "his" with "its"; but pointed out that some may not like what this would do to the common words "the" and "this". :-)

Posted by: Ted Schuerzinger on April 1, 2005 08:43 PM
32. I love it here in the land of the Snohos.

I am a Snoho. I live in snohomish, i shop in snohomish and i VOTE in snohomish. I am also a parent in snohomish, and i can't wait to get rid of this administrator who has too much time on her hands, and has to make a big deal out of a darn t-shirt, rather than be positive about her students who ARE making a difference.

Long live the snohos, may they find good cause to keep wearing their shirts.

Posted by: Mrs. S on April 5, 2005 09:19 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?