May 10, 2005
Call in the feds

U.S. Attorney John McKay was on the John Carlson show yesterday, insisting up and down that he could neither confirm nor deny whether there was a federal investigation into the King County election scandal.

It's odd then that the U.S. Attorney in Spokane has confirmed that the FBI has opened an inquiry into a possible "public corruption" case involving Mayor James West.

Not that what Mayor West is accused of doing in his office is in any way excusable, but election fraud strikes me as an even more serious form of public corruption. The public deserves to be reassured that the Feds are on the case, or if they're not, then we deserve to be told why they're not.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 10, 2005 11:34 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Agreed and good point. Bring in the Feds to King County!

Posted by: Michele on May 10, 2005 11:56 PM
2. Here's what makes the Dems a bunch of phonies on gay rights.

Change the gay thing around to hetero, well then he's just Bill Clinton. Heck he could go on to be governor or president by their standards. But since he's gay- well that's a huge scandal.

FAKES.

Posted by: Andy on May 11, 2005 12:02 AM
3. This is an example of one of the major reservations I have about the current form of the Republican party. They chase around every major evangelical issue - like going after a gay guy - but don't really give a damn about something that really threatens our republic, like corrupt elections.

Posted by: DeadManVoting (aka Iguana) on May 11, 2005 01:39 AM
4. I would be mighty disappointed if the Feds did not come in AFTER this election contest is over.
Too many clear cases of KingCo violating the law and other "negligence" all of which seems to favor one Party. Coincidence??
Let the Feds find out.
Patience.
How would it look if the Feds jumped in before the contest??? Like Bush is somehow helping Rossi? Exactly.
The Election Contest has built mounds of valuable evidence.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on May 11, 2005 05:54 AM
5. The feds are investigating it openly in Milwakee.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/5/10/232336.shtml

Why be so coy about the chance of an investigation here?

a

Posted by: abe on May 11, 2005 06:14 AM
6. Why aren't the Feds investigating the KingCo Elections Board? Perhaps because outside the fantasy world of some very bitterly disappointed Republicans, no one sees any real evidence of fraud.

So far, all we've seen is some sloppy administration in KingCo. But hey, we've now seen some pretty sloppy admin in a whole lot of other counties too. Fraud? No, just human error.

Sorry guys, the game is almost over. Hope you enjoyed it. We sure did.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on May 11, 2005 06:15 AM
7. From McKay's comments it may be at the Grand Jury already seeking indictments. Once it hits the Grand Jury the Feds can't say squat.

Kinda like the US Navy, ask if a nuc is on a dinghy or a Trident the stock answer is, "I can neither confirm or deny the presence of special weapon on this vessel."

If there were no investigation I think McKay would have been a little more forthcoming. IMHO.

Posted by: JCM on May 11, 2005 06:43 AM
8. From listening to McKay's comments on the air, the problem with the Feds bringing charges is that the election laws are so loose that it's tough to differentiate between outright fraud and imcompetence.

As has been pointed out here many times before, the laws were written in such a way that encourages fraud in many cases, but keeps the burden of proof of a conspiracy at almost ridiculus levels. Unless someone comes forward and says "I was involved in a conspiracy", then there isn't proof according to our election laws.

As we saw by our legislature, they're not going to change that either. Too many close races to decide.

Posted by: Ken on May 11, 2005 06:57 AM
9. As McKay noted on the show, the best thing to do is vote them out of office. I just hope that people don't become complacent between now and election time.

Thank God we have Stefan to keep us focused.

Posted by: Ken on May 11, 2005 06:59 AM
10. Oh look...swizzle-stick is back!

Yes, I have enjoyed it. "It" being the efforts to combat an entrenched and corrupt political machine.

I find it humorous (in a pathetic sort of way) that so few on the opposite side of the fence want to clean up anything, the thinking (if one could call it that) being "Well, as long as I am profiting from it, why should I change?".

Then there are others, such as yourself, that defy logic (and common sense) and proclaim, "There's nothing wrong here!" "Well, OK, there's some wrong going on here, but it isn't as bad as you suggest", "Yea, yea, things are really screwed up, but you guys are the ones that did it".

Yes, swizzle-stick, I am enjoying watching the worm turn.

Posted by: alphabet soup on May 11, 2005 07:00 AM
11. I agree with you Stefan, we do deserve to know what the status is on this.

Posted by: cc on May 11, 2005 07:13 AM
12. Well, I want West marched out of town in an orange jump suit. That being said, it's more than frustrating to see a media outlet, The Spokesman Review, busy entraping a public official, while at the same time ignoring the Gregoire election scandal.
News is funny stuff. It used to be that when you read a newspaper, that was the stuff that was happening. Now, it's just veiled propaganda.

Posted by: KC on May 11, 2005 07:42 AM
13. Let's make a comparison with slightly different circumstances. Let's imagine that the screwed up election was a dead body lying in the street. We don't KNOW FOR CERTAIN it was murder. But we have reason to believe foul play was involved. The presence of the body alone would start an investigation as to what happened.
What we have with this case is a dead election lying in the street and a federal authority who sees no reason to think it deserves to be investigated.
Isn't it the purpose of an "INVESTIGATION" to determine IF a crime was committed as well has WHO did it?

Posted by: Scott C on May 11, 2005 09:39 AM
14. Could it be that someone is playing the long game? By holding off the Feds until the contest is run through our courts it allows more rascals to show themselves. Then when the time is more ripe...say the election cycles for 2006 and 2008 we have a big federal investigation that not only snares little fish like Logan but bigger fish in other places (the old AG cronies, the courts, ect). If we're going to set Washington state free of one party rule it's going to take more than bagging Logan.

Posted by: Victor on May 11, 2005 09:43 AM
15. I understand your point, KC, but I think that it would be more accurate to place it on a continuum, rather than as absolutes. There will always be cloying sycophants that play the part of derivative journalism, the Hedda Hoppers of the world. They essentially gather wool at the feet of insiders and paraphrase for the benefit of the great unwashed. For the Balters, the Connelly’s, and the Schram’s of the world, spell check keeps returning “putz” for the word Pulitzer.

And it’s also true that what passes for “bravery” these days is often a screed about the opposition, not going against the “conventional wisdom” and actually digging for a story. We’ll likely wait a long time for that cub reporter emerging from the assignment of penetrating the dark underbelly of KCEs and revealing it’s shocking secrets.

Since when do honest people look at a series of troubling evidence and declare “there’s nothing here,” rather than investigate further?

When the history of this period in WA state history is written, this lack of depth and honesty on the part of the msm will surely figure prominently, along with the rise of the bloggers, et al to fill the vacuum created by the msm quitting the field.

And Scott C…nice name, btw…we don’t know that the feds have not begun an investigation, only that they won’t say that they have. It could easily be true that they have not surfaced, simply for the purpose of not warning the boss hoggs of KC to duck. ‘course if they don’t investigate when an investigation is appropriate, I’ll be hotter than a hornet. Or all over it like ugly on a hogg.

Posted by: scott158 on May 11, 2005 09:49 AM
16. Former Republican Senate Leader West is an embarassment, plain and simple. But, we've learned to decouple what they say from what they do. Rossi gave us that just fine....everything he said prior to the final recount was exactly opposite of what he did when he was in the same (losing) boat.

Pathetic.

Posted by: Tom Franklin on May 11, 2005 12:43 PM
17. Maybe John McKay's looking for a date?

Posted by: flexnfx on May 11, 2005 01:17 PM
18. "U.S. Attorney John McKay was on the John Carlson show yesterday, insisting up and down that he could neither confirm nor deny whether there was a federal investigation into the King County election scandal"

Think about this for a moment....

If The US Attorney had simply said he "could not confirm" whether there was a federal investigation ...I would be concerned.....BUT - he threw in that he also could not *deny* knowledge of a federal investigation......

Why else would he say he could not deny it?

Now, you have to wonder.....why the feds would not be forthcoming with their investigation....? Why hasn't it been blasted to the media? Why is West going down in flames so quickly and the KC elections doesn't appear to be an interest to the feds?
The West story has been investigated by some team of journalists for over 2 years.....Do you really think these journalists didn't bring their findings to the Feds? Like maybe 2 years ago? Do you really believe the Feds are just now acting on the West case? This is how they operate. They perform much of their preliminary investigation in a stealth manner - under the radar - unless somebody blows something up or kills somebody or robs a bank...

I find it very reassuring that the US Attorney made that statement on the Carlson show!

Posted by: Deborah on May 11, 2005 07:49 PM
19. Ahhh, hope springs eternal in the heart of conservative wackos. Glad you found some reassurance Deb. I'm sure you felt the same way about the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, and Salvation.

And they call us "feel good" liberals....

How's the "foreign sounding names" project going??

Posted by: Unkl Witz on May 11, 2005 10:41 PM
20. "And they call us "feel good" liberals...."
unce wizz...(princess)

They do?
Who are *They* anyway?

There is nothing *good* about a liberal. Liberal's share a rather oppressive ideology. Liberals embrace communism with a socialist twist...(that is - if you can truly separate the two...) Liberals oppress the people's will - they oppress individual freedoms, they oppress honesty and reward dishonesty. Liberals were called *Bleeding Hearts* in the past - but only until their true agenda was revealed....Now - the nation is becoming aware of the social destruction that has plagued us under the guise of *for the children* by the liberals!

Liberal's saw they were being exposed and tried to change their name to *Progressives*! Hah! Still a duck....

How on earth could *they* call liberals a *feel good*......anything?

Are the Feds investigating King County? I simply cannot deny the possibility! Neither can you!

Posted by: Deborah on May 11, 2005 11:35 PM
21. Right, Deborah.
The only thing libs "feel" good is my wallet. They grope it constantly. And always only for widows & orphans, right? I just want clean elections. Let the cards fall where they may.

DeadMan is also right. Thumb in the leaking dike. Fix the darn thing. Get us on national TV for doing something RIGHT for a change. Anyone with the 'olive pits' to do that in the N.W.?

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on May 12, 2005 12:55 AM
22. You two have been listening to too much Rush Limbaugh.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on May 12, 2005 06:15 AM
23. UW
If by that you mean listening to a source of more accurate information then the MSM, count me in for listening to Rush, KVI, and KOMO.

Posted by: Mark Beyer on May 12, 2005 06:56 AM
24. And Unc swizzle-stick has obviously been listening to the sound of wind whistling in one ear and out the other....

Posted by: alphabet soup on May 12, 2005 09:00 AM
25. Unkl--
...Are you talking to ME?...Are you talking to ME?!

If so, when you are defrauded on your purchase of your new bullet blender on TV, you will scream like a banshee to the atty general and any other consumer group who will hear your nails on the chalkboard.

Elections (and election screw-up's) are a tad more important than your relative value system. Dismiss this issue in your 'equal world.' To you, massive voting incompetence is equal to a hangnail. What, me worry?

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on May 12, 2005 03:10 PM
26. Mark:

I think you mean they provide information that is more pleasing to your ideology than the MSM, accuracy appears to be in the ear of the beholder.

Jimmie:

You might want to write your posts a little earlier in the day, before you've had that third martini. Perhaps then we could make some sense of them.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on May 12, 2005 05:04 PM
27. Unkl-
Touche. Sober now just for you, o.k.?

Say--you hurt my feelings with that hate speech--You must be olive-o-phobic (a new Seattle law.)

No, I haven't followed I-200 in my house to see if I 'hired' more diverse olives than green olives.

You belong on the Seattle city council. Flick you off my shoulder, fly.

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on May 12, 2005 08:21 PM
28. Glad you're feeling better now Jimmie. Nothing against olives around this house, in fact, I prefer the green ones soaked in gin with a hint of vermouth.

Just hate to see all this demonization of libs, we're human just like you.... ya know, kids, bills, hate pay taxes, etc. We just don't worship rich Republicans like you do. Nothing personal, just a different point of view.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on May 12, 2005 08:36 PM
29. Fair enough. I was about to give you a mean parting shot.

In the spirit of Stefan's hard work, this site, other great participants and your comments, I'll shake hands. (fingers crossed behind back)

I don't worship Republicans. Nor do I demonize libs (unless attacked.) I'm independent. Voted for both sides and split tickets for years. The person & his/her actions are my yardstick.

Not 'demonization'--I just despise the waste & games in ANY party or government. We can't do it for long in business, so I expect the same test.

We can disagree like gentlemen. Just remember that when you poke your finger in a cage, it may get nipped. There is no honor in being a doormat--nor a hoodwinked taxpayer. That's where my bile comes from.

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on May 13, 2005 10:27 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?