July 19, 2005
Die, Monorail, Die

The rapidly shriveling Seattle Monorail Project is now proposing to build itself in stages, Sound Transit style. At some point, they'll have to whittle the project down to this.

Watchdog group OnTrack is unimpressed with either the Monorail's plans or its transparency.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at July 19, 2005 11:19 AM | Email This
Comments
1.
"A shorter line also would involve less maintenance cost, he said -- but also would bring in less revenue than the completed one."

If they shortened to zero miles it would make the maintenance cost zero! That way no revenue (even if it is less than expenses) would be needed. Problem solved.

Posted by: fred on July 19, 2005 11:28 AM
2. This will be the "Dawn Of The Dead" of transit systems. Walking, never dying, and eating everything in it's path.

Posted by: swassociates on July 19, 2005 11:33 AM
3. If they diverted from what they promised in the voter's initiative approving their funding in the first place, wouldn't it have to go back to the voters for approval?

Posted by: Spaceboy on July 19, 2005 11:40 AM
4. Voter approval? HaaaHaaaaHaaHaaaaHaaaHaa!

Sorry Spaceboy - can you say Safeco Field, can you say Sound Transit Light Rail. That's the problem with these clowns, they don't give a rats a$$ what we think.

Posted by: Jeffro on July 19, 2005 12:18 PM
5. Stephan-

Regarding the photo you've attached to your post; it does look like their ridership estimates will be on target.

Also, regarding your McGavick post, (according to my companies copywriters) the period goes after the quotes as you've done. Not that you give a flying fig.

Posted by: Jeffro on July 19, 2005 12:33 PM
6. Perhaps they should follow Dory Monson's suggestion and whittle it down to a line from the Westlake mall to the Seattle Center.

Posted by: Jim on July 19, 2005 12:41 PM
7. SMP must build the Interbay segment first, because it has the maintenance facility. There is no reason to hold a single psuedo-public discussion about it. Whether this segment stops at Seattle Center or Westlake Mall or Pike Place Market or Seasqwauk Arena is another matter.

My objection has always been that this route through downtown and to Ballard won't serve even half as many people as other route options. So, why build it? Cuz we can? Cuzza the money?

Posted by: Artie on July 19, 2005 12:44 PM
8. What about building an elevated highway, say, above Alaskan Way, run busses on it and call it something like, oh, the Alaskan Way Viaduct? It could shuttle those same people that would ride SMP on roughly the same route. Just a thought.

Posted by: Jeffro on July 19, 2005 12:55 PM
9. I WISH EVERYONE IN SEATTLE WOULD STOP TALKING ABOUT THE MONORAIL.....IT KEEPS GIVING THE MONO- MORONS IN TACOMA GOVERNMENT IDEAS...LIKE MAYBE WE CAN BULID A MONRAIL OVER THE FREEWAY TO THE EMERALD QUEEN FROM DOWNTOWN...YOU CANT HAVE TOO MANY WAYS TO GET TO A NATIVE GAMING ESTABLISHMENT!!!!

I BEG YOU, PLEASE STOP TALKING ABOUT A MONRAIL .... MAYBE THE TACOMA MONO-CRATS WILL FORGET AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT "EMERGANCY"

Posted by: TACOMA PHLASH on July 19, 2005 01:21 PM
10. Well, I don't know about that Shark. Those wooden posts look awfully expensive.

Maybe the monorail should just lay the track directly down on the street.

Posted by: BananaLand (aka Iguana) on July 19, 2005 01:57 PM
11. The Niles Monorail option looks affordable. :-)Can you see Mrs. Gregoire riding in that thing with her knees all bent like that??

Posted by: Michele on July 19, 2005 03:05 PM
12. Michele-

....and maybe a big sack of stolen toys and a little dog with a branch for an antler - oh sorry, I'm thinking of the Grinch Who Stole Christmas.

Posted by: Jeffro on July 19, 2005 03:18 PM
13. Even if it only went 50 feet, the top eleven executives will still make over $150K/year. Unless, of course, it red lines more than 6 times the estimated operating costs, in which case they will all get raises to $200K plus.

Posted by: Huey on July 19, 2005 03:25 PM
14. Hang the passenger seats from overhead cables (a la ski-lifts) to transport riders from station to station. That will eliminate the high cost of both tracks and cars. On Track can then rename itself
On Suspension.

ReVOTERguy

Posted by: ReVOTERguy on July 19, 2005 08:06 PM
15. Is that a picture of Joel Horn, riding around in a project that he actually got off the ground?

Posted by: lksimstrailgrammy on July 19, 2005 10:51 PM
16. I Liked the post above It Tickled my funny bone!

Posted by: Laurie on July 20, 2005 08:45 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?