November 29, 2005
UW Study: Charters Can Be Viable; Especially For Minorities

The National Charter School Research Project at the University of Washington's Evans School of Public Affairs has released an 84-page report titled, "Hopes, Fears And Reality: A Balanced Look At American Charter Schools in 2005" (access page to full study here). It was based on available data for 3,300 charters nationwide (the number has since grown, which tells you something). Bottom line, according to this UW summary: charter schools, like television, radio, newspapers, blogs, or government, are a tool that can be well-used, or not, depending on who's involved. And, charters serve a higher proportion of minority and low-income students than non-charter schools.

What's it all mean for Washington state? Admittedly, school choice isn't coming here anytime soon. At least not until Republicans again control at least one legislative chamber in Olympia. AND not until Washington's Black and Latino charter supporters - they ARE out there, plus Native Americans, too - muster the numbers and public presence to offset the teacher union scare tactics which convinced city and suburban voters to overturn an exceedingly modest charter law passed in 2004.

In the meantime, though, here's some food for thought from the The Sacramento Bee today (free. reg. req.) It's a tantalizing glimpse of what Washington state sadly lacks: competition, rigor, and the attendant excitement, in public education. And a high bar for minority students, who respond in kind.

For more of this inspiring story, read on (Apple Safari users, click on time stamp to continue).

Shana Brye's son was in the second grade when his teacher said he couldn't learn. "She told me point-blank: There's nothing you can do," Brye said. Brye didn't like that message. She took her son out of his Elk Grove school and transferred him to Public School #7, a charter school in Sacramento's Oak Park neighborhood. "I knew he'd be academically challenged," she said. "This year we've seen a turnaround." Now in its third year, PS7 is part of a fledgling movement to turn education into a marketplace with many sellers. Charter schools, advocates argue, create options for families who can't afford private school - and in the process, force district schools to compete for students.

In California, charter schools for the most part must accept all applicants. The schools are public but operate free from many of the regulations that bind school districts. In exchange, they are accountable to a district, county or state board for getting the results promised in a written contract, or charter. If they fail to do so, they can be shut down. The notion has proved popular across the political spectrum: 40 states have passed charter school laws since 1992. There are 3,600 such schools serving more than a million children across the country. California accounts for a sixth of the schools, serving one-fifth of those children.

This fall, more than 80 new charter schools opened in California. Sacramento County now has 33, Placer County five, and El Dorado County seven, according to the California Charter School Association. In some ways, PS7, a 280-student school run by the nonprofit St. HOPE Public Schools, is an example of what charter schools do best: use their autonomy to place stricter demands on parents, teachers and students.

Students at PS7, most of them African American and many of them poor, work longer hours and have fewer days off than do kids in typical district schools. Parents sign a pledge promising to read to students at night and spend 40 hours a year volunteering at the school. The payoff: The school posted an impressive 99-point leap last year in its Academic Performance Index scores, a key state indicator of performance.

...But PS7 also is open to many of the same criticisms that charter schools have faced since the inception of the movement....some complain that by drawing the kinds of involved parents whose children would do well anywhere, the school leaves other campuses in the Sacramento City Unified School District to tackle the "tough cases."

"When you have parents going out of their way to choose a school, watch over the school very closely and be involved in the school, that is a huge indicator of a child's success in school," said Marcie Launey, president of the Sacramento City Teachers Association. "If we could get that from every parent in the district, our children would be on the road to success."

Right. And because some parents are laggard, other more diligent parents and their children should be punished by restricted or denied access to charters?

"I'm especially pleased that PS7 is serving a high percentage of African Americans and having the success they're having," said board member Rick Jennings. "They are showing African Americans can learn at the same rate as other students that have been successful in the district. That is very, very encouraging."

There's no consensus on how effective charter schools are. That's partly because the schools share few common traits, and partly because the science of evaluating schools is still in its infancy, according to a University of Washington study released Monday.

But Pegany said that PS7 is achieving results that can't be chalked up to parent involvement alone. "The vast majority of our students," he said, "have never really had success in school." And the people at PS7 - the parents, teachers and administrators - say the school has high expectations for students whom other schools often dismiss.

...Standing in the entryway, parent Jonathan Murry pointed to the signs that hang next to each classroom. One, hanging next to a fourth-grade room, reads "Class of 2018": the year those students are expected to graduate from college.
"They're really getting kids at an early age to think about college. A lot of schools don't even do that," he said. Principal Pegany said the school's success lies in a mix of aggressive assessment, early intervention and hard work.

Students are in class eight hours a day, sometimes longer. Struggling students - as well as their teachers - give up their fall and spring breaks to work on reading and math skills.

The school tracks individual progress with weekly assessments. Pegany has a color-coded chart in his office that breaks down each student's performance on state tests. "We expect every child to grow one and a half years in reading every year. It takes a lot of work to do that," he said.

Parents and voters, Seattle and suburban Puget Sound school board members, administrators, fair-minded teachers and turf-obsessed union leaders should ALL take heed: raising the bar high is the answer to foundering public schools, and that's what charters are about. As a property-tax payer, I'm really tired of funding crappy Seattle public schools my kids can't use. Give me a choice that doesn't involve moving to the suburbs (where in many cases, public schools are quite mediocre, if not dysfunctional); or forking out thousands per year for private schools. Charter schools: another reason to work all that much harder to get Dino Rossi elected Governor AGAIN in 2008. Remember, if it's not so close, they can't cheat!

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at November 29, 2005 10:46 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Excellent post, Matt! I'm going to dig into that Evans School report when I have some free time, but once again you've hit the nail on the head.

R

Posted by: Randy Mueller on November 29, 2005 11:18 PM
2. The UW study is intelligent. Your headline is not. "Charters Can Be Viable"???? What on earth does that mean? How about a financial headline, "Stocks Can Be Viable"?

I don't have a strong feeling about charters one way or the other. But the research, including the UW report you tout before lapsing into anecdotal rapture, has failed to show that they can be a significant part of the solution to our school problems. So if you're serious about improving education, this doesn't seem to be the most worthwhile battle to be fighting. If you're hung up on ideology, well, that's another story.

Posted by: Bruce on November 29, 2005 11:56 PM
3. Bruce, if you're serious about addressing any issue seriously, why don't you demonstrate? Are you the friggin' style police?


This isn't a rhetorical exercise. There's been a charter school movement for the past 20 years in Washington State. The issue has been run before the voters and soundly rejected. Matt's framing of the question is entirely appropriate.

Posted by: South County on November 30, 2005 04:17 AM
4. Washington voters have rejected charter schools three times. Last year, several billionaires pumped millions of dollars into the pro-charter school campaign, and voters still rejected charters by nearly 60 percent.

It wasn't about fear; it was about focusing on what really works: good teachers, smaller class sizes and safe school buildings. Despite the rhetoric, there's no good evidence that charter schools improve student achievement more than regular public schools.

It's time to move on and invest in our state's public schools in a way that benefits all children. As a dad with two sons in public schools, that's what I want.

Posted by: Rich Wood on November 30, 2005 09:00 AM
5. It is really hard to have better teachers and true smaller class sizes when WEA leads the way. WEA wants to have overwhelmingly top heavy school districts. Superintendant, several assistant superintendants, then Principal and many vice principals, etc, etc. If they'd just get rid of about half the administrative positions they'd be better off. Less paperwork, fewer offices for those who just administrate (act as yes men to their boss), less impediments for teachers to get to someone who can actually act on a concern. Also less interference from the myriad of administrators who think they have to stir things up to prove their job is required.

Posted by: Bob in SeaTac on November 30, 2005 09:23 AM
6. One reason this keeps failing is because parents believe the lies the teachers pass on to the kids. My daughter came home in 2000 telling me that one of her teachers told her to tell me to vote it down because it could be a cult movement. Seriously. And then in 2004, I personally heard a teacher tell a friend a different lie about charter schools. She told my friend that if charter schools passed, public schools would have to PAY charter schools. The lie campaign has worked for the opponents of charter schools for far too long. The same problem with this state's voters, far too many don't bother to do research on issues; they simply believe what they hear.

Posted by: Miriam on November 30, 2005 11:08 AM
7. This doesn't really prove that charter schools are better or worse than public schools. What it suggests to me is that parental involvement is the key to the success of students. Since charter schools tend to attract committed parents along with the students, they likewise have better support and encouragement for those students.

Posted by: Mickymse on November 30, 2005 02:16 PM
8. What a refreshing group of remarks I'm reading here. It sounds like a group of people who keep up with what is really happening. Overall, charter schools do no better than public schools. Period. In fact, the good ones are very much based on the parents dedication to the schools.

We have now had this charter issue come before Washington state voters 4 times and I'd say we're done. I wish Paul Hill and the folks at the UW Center for Reinventing Education would move on and get some real research done instead of beating - for this state at least - a dead horse.

And one last aside, the record for millionaires and billionaires putting their money into education issues in our state isn't good. Gates and Allen both supported charter schools. That was a no go. Gates Sr. just put his money into a PAC to elect certain candidates to the Seattle School Board; that didn't work either. I guess the public (you know the people who actually send their kids to public school unlike Gates) really does know what it wants.

Posted by: westello on November 30, 2005 03:29 PM
9. Charter Schools = Red Herring. But the concept keeps frustrated parents distracted and chasing their collective tails...and more importantly, far away from any truely meaningful school reform.

As a parent with three teenagers, I suggest that the main reason the number of charter schools is rising is sheer desperation from parents...seeking options to unsuccessful public education systems.

Many successful private schools currently exist, because they are proven to provide a service that parents are willing to support with their money and volunteer time. That is why vouchers are the only real viable alternative. And why I refuse to waste my time on anything less.

Each charter school is an experiment, like reinventing the wheel with each new school. I rate charter schools about the same as whole language, ebonics, and new math...unsuccessful attempts to reinvent the wheel. Because in the long run, that's where I believe charter schools will end up...on the long list of failed educational experiments.

Posted by: dl on December 1, 2005 08:45 AM
10. Especially for Minorities...once again the liberals are experimenting on the poor and uneducated. That's just sick and wrong.

Posted by: dl on December 1, 2005 09:36 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?