December 27, 2005
"They knew what would happen"

A reader with intimate knowledge of King County's mail ballot operation e-mailed to comment on my report yesterday that Dean Logan sat on the GOP's challenges of mail box voters for an extra week, which was long enough to allow 40% of the challenged mail ballots to be processed before the challenges could be adjudicated:

What makes this interesting is that last Spring when they were removing felons, they immdiately suspended the absentee record and put a challenge code in so that they couldn't process them when they were returned. They did this to the suspected felon list without any research. By waiting a week, they knew what would happen. DIMS has a very easy solution to the suspend/challenge process. All you need to do is put either their voter registration number or absentee number into a text file ... You then go through the Wanda upload utility and upload all those numbers and it will ask you for a code to put them in. You tell the system you are suspending these ballots and the reason code would be voter challenge. If they had already returned the balllot they could have gone to those batches and looked to see if it was indeed processed..
It shouldn't have taken the Elections office eight days to create a text file with the voter ids. They could have even obtained such a spreadsheet from the GOP, which obviously had one. But they didn't, presumably because they knew what would happen.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at December 27, 2005 10:30 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Is the problem with comments back? I swear I saw a few comments under this entry, but now I see none.

Posted by: C. Oh on December 27, 2005 01:47 PM
2. Dean Logan must not have all his employees "Afraid" for their jobs. I really don't think he is smart enough to figure that out "all by himself".

Keep up the pressure Stefan, someone will "Crack" eventually.

Posted by: Chris on December 27, 2005 02:35 PM
3. Not enough vigilance before the last election by the Repubs. They should have brought up the illegal registrations - not a week before, but a month before. Sure there was some stonewalling that would have made this difficult, but someone should have blown that whistleor thrown out this possiblity sooner. Stefan did the yeoman's work, but it should be abundantly clear that the shills who work for KCRE cannot be trusted. I think that the post gets to the heart of the story.

I ask for the umpteenth time - what is holding back there being a Federal investigation of KCRE ? Seems like we need to be sending this stuff forward to the US AG and ccing the US Attorney and the head of the FBI. Aren't these practices unlawful ? If the Feds are ignoring this situation, Stefan or someone - like maybe Steve Hammond - if he is actually the ombudsman for King County ? If not him, how about a legal opinion from Shawn Newman ? If this is being brought to the Feds attention, I am missing it, because I haven't seen one single post about this on SP.

Posted by: KS on December 27, 2005 02:49 PM
4. The Feds will only get involved when it is a federal election.

Posted by: sgmmac on December 28, 2005 06:44 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?