February 06, 2006
Mrs. Gregoire, campaign finance criminal?

Richard Pope has filed a complaint against Mrs. Gregoire1 alleging numerous violations of campaign finance laws, mostly having to do with incomplete disclosure reports and missed deadlines.

When Mrs. Gregoire endorsed Cuba Dwight Pelz for state Democrat Party Chairman as "a passionate advocate for the values we all share", those shared values apparently included reckless disregard of campaign finance laws.

--
1 The haughty, French-named Massachusetts-style former Attorney General, who by the way missed a deadline for filing an appeal that ended up costing the taxpayers $18 million.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at February 06, 2006 03:41 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Fat chance the PDC or AG will do anything except a slap on the wrist. Despicable human beings.

Posted by: swatter on February 6, 2006 04:29 PM
2. Anyone who believes the PDC isn't political is crazed. Just look at the PDC website, read & weep over the biographies. A token RINO, a conservative and 3 LEFTISTS. Many 3-2 votes....all in favor of LEFTISTS and against Republicans. Another bit of public information the MSM NEVER speaks about.
Simple question...
Who are the PDC Commissioners???

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on February 6, 2006 05:45 PM
3. This article is the headline story from Sunday's Peninsula Daily News, a little po-dunk newspaper.
Where was it in the Seattle Times and P-I??????

"Hood Canal Bridge price tag jumps 62 percent to $471 million
2006-02-05
by ANDREW BINION"

The price tag for replacing the aging Hood Canal Bridge increased 62 percent between February and October of 2005, but there still is no date set for when construction will be complete.

In the state Department of Transportation's latest estimate of the total cost of the project included in its 2005 fourth quarter report, the bridge's price tag jumped $179.4 million from a February 2005 estimate of $291.5 million to an October estimate of almost $471 million.

``The idea is that we're not going to spend every penny of that. It's just the total budgeted amount,'' said Lloyd Brown, a Transportation spokesman.

Included in the price tag is the rising price of steel and an additional $59.3 million to build bridge pontoon parts in Tacoma rather than in Port Angeles.

The contract for bridge construction was originally awarded to Kiewit-General Construction Co. of Poulsbo in December 2003 for $203 million, not including property and other costs.

PA expenses increase

The amount of money spent or earmarked in Port Angeles for the now-defunct graving yard also climbed -- from an estimated $58.5 million in February to an estimated $86.8 million in October.

Tse-whit-zen expenses include construction costs, legal settlements, engineering and design, landscaping, materials, land acquisition and leases, anchor cable replacement, archaeological work and department contract management.

There also is about $2.1 million in new money added to the budget for ``remaining archaeology work.''

Brown said that he did not know what that money would be spent for.

The archaeology stems from the discovery -- after the huge dry dock for bridge component construction was started in summer 2003 -- of a 2,700-year-old Klallam village and more than 300 burials.

The graving yard construction project was canceled in December 2004.

Frances Charles, chairwoman of the Lower Elwha Klallam tribe, said she did not know what the newly budget archaeological money would go for, nor had she been contacted by Transportation about the budget adjustments.

The human remains found at the ancient village are ancestors of the Lower Elwha Klallam.

Port Angeles may be the site of the bridge's concrete anchor construction, but the location has not been finalized, and neither has the cost."

I particularly guffaw at the line where Lloyd Brown tries to assure us
`The idea is that we're not going to spend every penny of that.'
Yeah right.
Follow the money folks.
By the way, today was DAY 90 of The improved traffic due to major GasTax Increase Vigil...
Report---
Traffic still sucks!!!!!!!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on February 6, 2006 05:50 PM
4. They undoubtedly are criminals. Sounds despicable as usual. Do you know why the Super Bowl had such horrible officiating yesterday ?

God's way of payback for the despicable way the current Governor was elected in this state - unfortunately the wrath was taken out on a quality team that had nothing to do with that event. Not saying that it made the difference in the game, but what it comes back to is blame it on Gregoire ! Now for some strange reason, I feel better.

Posted by: KS on February 6, 2006 05:56 PM
5. "``The idea is that we're not going to spend every penny of that. It's just the total budgeted amount,'' said Lloyd Brown, a Transportation spokesman."

Bwahahahahahah! Hehehehhee! Hohohoho!
Stop it, Brown, you're making my sides hurt from all the laughter!
So, what is the accountability of that money? If you're not going to spend all of it, what is it doing in the budget? If you get all of it, where is that "extra" money going to go?
Surely there are some good explanations for this, aren't there?

Posted by: pseudotsuga on February 6, 2006 06:04 PM
6. Psuedotsuga--
Precisely!!!!!!!
Government's latest invention is called Contingency Funds! They do exactly what Brown is doing here. And guess what, it WILL get spent and no one will ever know where and how.
This is government at it's worst and why Washington Voters were SUCKERS for panicking and paying the extortionists with more GasTax Dollars BEFORE fixing the WSDOT spending machine.
When do you suppose the Seattle Times and P-I will pick this one up???? NEVER!!!
Why would a little dinky paper scoop them on this story??? Because they turn the other cheek rather than hold government accountable for tax dollars. I love how the Times and P-I allow zillions of words on our civil rights being taken away.....and then ignore the LEFTIST screw-ups.
No wonder both newspapers are going down the tubes. No one I know subscribes and few even go on-line ever.
Pathetic.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on February 6, 2006 06:20 PM
7. The Queen doesn't have to obey the law, she IS the law and her word is THE LAW. Sheesh, get with the program, that bit on a old, moldy piece of paper written by dead white guys about "Government for the People, by the People," is SO outdated.

Posted by: JCM on February 6, 2006 09:11 PM
8. I’ am quite sure that the P.D.C. is very interested at looking into this ...RIGHT!!!

Posted by: TACOMA PHLASH on February 6, 2006 11:49 PM
9. I made two complaints against Pat Davis (Port of Seattle) for similar things last year. The PDC fined her $2,000 for her 2005 campaign and $7,500 for her 2001 campaign (and also ordered her to pay back $6,055 from her 2001 campaign).

We will see what happens to the complaints against Dwight Pelz and Christine Gregoire. By the way, Gregoire endorsed Pat Davis' re-election last year (and so did Attorney General Rob McKenna). So if they can fine Pat Davis, they should be able to fine anybody.

Posted by: Richard Pope on February 7, 2006 12:45 AM
10. By the way, I wonder how much Gregoire's trip to the Super Bowl cost us?

Gregoire uses her surplus campaign funds to pay for certain office-related expenses that the taxpayers legally cannot pay for. For example, when her husband Mike Gregoire travels with her, the taxpayers cannot pay for Mike's airfare and meals.

On April 14, 2005, Gregoire used $3,554 of surplus funds to Global Express for "travel" -- presumably Mike's airplane ticket.

On September 16, 2005, Gregoire used $3,604.95 of surplus funds to All Ways Travel for Mike's airfare on a trade mission.

Evidently, Gregoire travels first class when she is on a commercial airline. Otherwise, Mike's tickets wouldn't be so expensive. Of course, there is always the state plane for domestic travel, which is even more expensive than first class tickets.

I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with a Governor travelling first class. I don't know what Dino Rossi would have done in a similar position. I know some governors are a good bit more frugal in their travel budgets than Gregoire.

How many officials in Gregoire's administration travel first class?

Posted by: Richard Pope on February 7, 2006 12:58 AM
11. Mr. Pope...

I think a better question would be ...how many officials work in the Gregforhire administration...about 1/2!!!

Posted by: TACOMA PHLASH on February 7, 2006 01:49 AM
12. That many?

Posted by: Richard Pope on February 7, 2006 04:40 AM
13. There will be no policical finance reform in this state. Remember the people who run it will find loop holes for Democrats to violate and Forget those same loop holes for Republicans. How can the Union give 720K to do the recount because they knew they would make 15M in more dues. And no one will stop them. Democrats are for special interests. At least the state got rid of hundreds of employees. Not for incompendence but because they would not pay the union. The only way to get fired. What was it in 2001 a state employee misspends over a million dollars of the budget and gets a pay raise and a new job. Union will protect the incompetent. Dont even mention the tribal groups. Another democratic special interest. Remember they are considered a foriegn enity and they dont have to follow any laws. And Thanks to John McCain they are excempt because both Democrats and He can get unlimited payoffs from them to protect the Indians monopoly.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on February 7, 2006 05:51 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?