April 12, 2006
Five Dollars A Day

That's what jurors receive in Idaho.  Which makes me feel a little better about my own pay.  But not much, since parking is probably cheaper in Idaho.

(Several commenters said that Washington's ten dollars a day dates back to 1959; that would have been very close to the minimum wage then, as I recall.)

Posted by Jim Miller at April 12, 2006 02:59 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I thought there was a minimum pay rule in this town!

Posted by: GS on April 12, 2006 04:50 PM
2. My first job was about that time. $0.75 an hour or 6 dollars a day. It was in real money though, silver coins if I wanted them. That equates to around $54 with the devalued currency of today.

Posted by: Maxon on April 12, 2006 06:01 PM
3. I think everyone should have the chance to participate in a jury trial. I have been summoned twice but went my whole week both times without being called in. However, as part of a volunteer experience with the local county clerk's office, I had the chance to follow a few trials from voir dire to closing arguments. THAT was a very interesting experience, especially considering my intentions to go into law school. Even without that, I think that it should be a required civics requirement for high school kids to watch a trial from start to finish, and at least an unwritten requirement for everyone else to serve on a jury or otherwise get firsthand education in our legal system.

Posted by: NotAGreener on April 12, 2006 06:45 PM
4. $5.00... at that rate they will only get "ILLEGAL"...err... I mean guest workers to sit on a jury!!!

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on April 12, 2006 08:43 PM
5. In 1959, there was no minimum wage. It was called a prevailing wage. The level of the prevailing wage was determined by market forces, not government fiat.

Posted by: huckleberry on April 12, 2006 08:52 PM
6. NotAGreener, I'm a recent grad of Seattle Univ School of Law. If you have questions about law school I'd be glad to try and answer them for you. A law degree is a wonderful education. It requires a lot of hard work, a lot of dedication and time, but well worth it.

On the issue of jury duty, it is a problem. Unless one works for a company that pays one's salary while on jury duty, most people can't afford to take the time off from work, and they're usually excused. What's the result? A jury that's made up of the retired, independently wealthy, and unemployed.

Hardly a jury of one's peers.

Posted by: Joseph Cantu, Esq on April 12, 2006 10:11 PM
7. Conselor Cantu, I agree--my experience is that most people feel it's an inconvenience and dwell only on when they are going home daily, not on anyone's impartial justice; i.e.--my microwave dinner trumps your verdict; how to incentivize it? maybe lots more pay or something else; must have been studies done on this; i think lawyers play precisely on this apathy in jury selections;

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on April 12, 2006 10:46 PM
8. If I were to do jury duty, I should not ever find myself on a jury, because the minute they find out that I listen to KVI, admire the police and the military and think that criminals deserve what they get, they'd put me out as soon as humanly possible.
And one more thing--if I were ever a judge, they'd call me the hanging judge.

Posted by: Misty on April 13, 2006 03:20 AM
9. Misty, there's always going to be one side that will favor your views. So your chances might be better than you think. I was chosen for a jury trial a couple of years ago. During voir dire, they could probably figure out I was conservative, but as long as you don't start preaching about totalitarianism or anything, they don't have objections to just being a conservative.

Some of the things people said to try and get out of jury duty were laughable at best, and just pathetic in some instances. I could only shake my head in disbelief. If I was the guy on trial, I would be hoping these people were not chosen (and they weren't).

Posted by: Palouse on April 13, 2006 08:12 AM
10. Mexico has announced it seeks closer ties with Iran. They are suggesting military cooperation, among other ideas. How a tequila-drinking, pork-eating, Catholic country is supposed to get along with a strict Muslim theocracy has yet to be announced, but this proposed alliance does offer the US a unique opportunity. We can now bring our national guard troops home from Iraq and put them on the southern border because Mexico would have allied itself with Islamo-terroist state. It’s also a good reason to build a wall between us and Mexico. It could be that the actions of the Mexican government might indirectly solve the illegal immigration problem!

Posted by: Yossarian on April 13, 2006 08:28 AM
11. For what it's worth, I served on a jury for the U.S. District Court last fall and they paid $40 a day. Even though I'm a military vet, listen to KVI, support the police, and believe criminals belong in jail. Nobody asked me that.

Posted by: RBW on April 13, 2006 08:53 AM
12. During the Dino Rossi race, my brother referred me to this site. I have been very impressed.

At NorthIdahoBlogs.Com I have tried to follow your lead by reporting specifically about a judicial race we are having in a primary on May 23, 2006.

Check out some of the comments this judge has made to a murderer: "believe you are spiritual..."

I have attempted to mirror how you and your contriubutors deliver the facts about cases, case numbers, links to the source, etc.

I hope some of your outstanding people at this site might consider visiting and lending some moral support.

I BELIEVE YOU WILL SHOCKED AT THE lack of sentences and utter commitment this judge has for treating sex offenders and light sentences for felons.

So, here is a rookie who hardly knows how to use a computer...giving it my best shot.

Thank you for your inspiration and advice in advance.

Bob

Posted by: Bob on April 16, 2006 08:12 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?