P-I "Mail-only balloting closer in county"
The switch to vote-by-mail-only elections in King County moved closer to realization Thursday as County Executive Ron Sims formally asked the County Council to approve the change and get the process rolling.Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 20, 2006 11:30 PM | Email This
Yes, we all should be outraged, but I don't think that the general population is.
My family votes by absentee ballot. Call us lazy, whatever, but we vote only once per person. So I don't thing that mail ballots are necessarily a bad thing.
I do agree, however, that there is an opportunity for fraud. We know that the D's don't believe in a fair election because their viewpoint is that because they are so "enlightened" that they should hold elective office, and also because that we "evil" R's (although I'm more a liberterian) should be kept from elective office because we don't hold those values the D's hold dear.
The D's seek to limit the speech of people and issues with which they don't agree.
So much for free speech.
Posted by: Obi-Wan on April 21, 2006 12:02 AMIf there could have been a respectable voter turnout in the 2005 election (especially on the east side) the news could have been entirely different.
Now we can only sit back and watch as the foundation is being laid for a juggernaut that conservatives may never overcome.
Let's see if these same republicans and independents will raise the white flag of surrender over illegal inmmigration and border security.
Posted by: jaybo on April 21, 2006 06:51 AMA good book on the subject is a new book by Travis Rowley called "Out of Ivy" which details his experiences with left leaning profressors and students at Brown University. Here's an article: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22128
The cover provided by the anonymity of all mail elections is just the ticket for moonbats to assure they will always have the votes they need to win close elections. And Dean Logan has already proven that he can't and won't enforce even the very weak election controls that are in place.
Posted by: Jeff B. on April 21, 2006 08:14 AMFirst, how is a vote-by-mail-only system more corruptable than our current system? There are many such systems elsewhere in the nation, and I don't hear any hysterical screams coming from those places.
Second, what about the merits of a vote-by-mail-only system? If all of the ballots are being submitted the same way, wouldn't it be easier to monitor potential fraud than with a multi-modal system?
Finally, some of these rants are ripe with hypocracy... as though there isn't any voter fraud in the "red counties," and the complete discounting of the fact that a vote-by-mail-only system is more streamlined, requires less government, and saves money...
Is there voting fraud? You bet! At the polls, and at the mailbox... At the level where the votes are counted, and at the level where the rules are written... In eastern Washington and Seattle... and in Florida and Ohio...
Besides, unless you're going to completely outlaw absentee voting (pity those poor soldiers), you might as well do vote-by-mail-only. What ever happend to everyone following the same rules?
Posted by: XXX on April 21, 2006 09:25 AMWhat ever happened to everyone following the same rules, indeed!
Posted by: Jeff B. on April 21, 2006 10:02 AMWe all know that prosecutions for vote/election fraud keep coming from heavily Democrat areas around the country.
It is a crying shame that this happens. Wake up. It is a heavily democrat problem!
We did not hear of these kinds of problems in Republican counties. We keep hearing of it from the Dem areas. I refuse to let you say this is a republican problem, too. It just ISN'T!
Is there any new information about Initiative 932 to break King County into two? We need to leave this ship before it's too late!
Posted by: Elvis is the King County on April 22, 2006 02:39 AMWith poll voting, ballots are kept within view of poll workers from election day until the date the ballots are locked away in storage. With absentee ballots, election personnel lose control.
First, ballots are sent out via the US postal service, which might lose some en route to the voters, or the ballots might get stolen in the mail.
Second, the voters might lose their ballots or fill out their family members' ballots.
Third, the ballots are returned via the US Postal Service, which again might lose them.
Fourth, all absentee ballot envelopes are shipped off to a private contractor for sorting, where no observers can monitor the process. Furthermore, there are no accounting measures in place to guarantee that all ballots sent to the private contractor are returned. What can prevent a corrupt employee from "losing" a few ballot envelopes here and there from heavily Republican return addresses, such as Issaquah or Black Diamond? Chances are, Republican candidates would lose votes that way. While this type of fraud could occur with corrupt election officials, when the ballot envelopes are in the possession of Elections department personnel, citizen observers have a chance of spotting such behavior.
So for ballot security reasons alone, I oppose expanding absentee ballot operations to make it mandatory for all voters. At a minimum, if we are to preserve our dual system (poll voting and absentees) we need in-house envelope sorting equipment for absentee envelopes.
Posted by: Tim B. on April 22, 2006 11:53 AMThese jerks will do anything and have no shame.. At least, the people should be able to decide an issue like this - especially when Deanron cannot be trusted any farther than they can be thrown.
Posted by: KS on April 22, 2006 08:40 PM