April 28, 2006
So long, Sonics!
finethenleave.com is throwing the Sonics a going-away party, Thursday May 11th, noon, at City Hall

"We'll toast the team, remember the good times, and collect going-away cards that we'll ask the City Council to deliver to the Sonics for us. We'll provide the cake and gold watch, you provide the memories. Bring a card if you can or sign one of ours.

It's been fun, and we're sorry to see you go...but we're not about to dump $200 million tax dollars into Key Arena..."

hat tip: Erica Barnett at The Stranger blog

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 28, 2006 04:40 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Be VERY careful here....

Unless your LA, losing professional teams can turn 1st class cities into 2nd class ones.

Don't believe me?

Check out Birmingham and Cincinnati.

Hmm...Cincinnati sounds like a 1st class city and Birmingham not.

Now check their populations, demographics, etc. Pretty similar, eh?

Guess where all the major company headquarters are. Guess where people move to take new jobs.

Be very careful...................

Posted by: LovinUSa on April 28, 2006 04:55 PM
2. Guess where all the major company headquarters are

I'll only observe that there are more major company headquarters in Redmond than in Green Bay.

Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky on April 28, 2006 04:58 PM
3. Correct.

And Green Bay is the far and wide exception as noted by all.

Posted by: Lovinusa on April 28, 2006 05:07 PM
4. I hate to break the news to the Seattle Weekly's Geov Parrish (see Parrish post on site), but the money that "collegiate" sports teams make does not go "into education. It goes to the Athletics Department, and often simply right back to the program that made it. And college football and basketball teams weren't exactly short on rap sheets the last I noticed. Not even at the U. The players have just had less time than the pros to accumulate them.

Posted by: stu on April 28, 2006 05:10 PM
5. > Unless your LA, losing professional teams can turn 1st class cities into 2nd class ones.

Symptom, not disease. The same factors that turn cities 2nd class make teams want to leave.

Posted by: brett on April 28, 2006 05:20 PM
6. I salute LovinUSa and both Seattle papers, who are all so class conscious that their sensitivity to the alleged 1st or 2nd class status of Seattle far outranks that of the Princess to the Pea.

It doesn't make a hoot what the commentariat gasbags say about the class of the city.

On second thought, one would think that a 1st class city would have sufficient well-heeled 'elites' to afford their own overhyped team, without dunning the citizens to help elevate the noses of the owners.

Posted by: Hank Bradley on April 28, 2006 05:37 PM
7. Sonics? CYA!

Not one dime for another pro sports ripoff.

Posted by: Hinton on April 28, 2006 05:45 PM
8. What a lame ass arguement... I am not for cutting a blank check to the Sonics, but this is not a one or the other arguement. Maybe you should elect someone other than the lemming liberals that run this town, as they obviously haven't found the need to do anything you mention below after decades of "leadership"

"With $200 million dollars, we could build permanent housing for the 2,000 homeless people in the county. Or we could just shelter them all—for 18 years. We could avoid closing our schools and maybe even build one downtown so families could live there. We could fund arts and other cultural events and build basketball courts all over town. Gosh, maybe we could even do something about all the traffic. "

Posted by: Eric on April 28, 2006 06:16 PM
9. My prediction: The Bellevue _________s .

Posted by: KS on April 28, 2006 07:02 PM
10. San Diego actually moved up a notch when the Clippers left town in the middle of the night, heading up to LA to be that city's second pro (being generous here) basketball team.

There were very few San Diegans who shed a tear. Most were only unhappy because they missed out on a chance to pack the Clip's bags -- and give them a kick in the a$$ on their way out of town.

Posted by: FT on April 28, 2006 07:26 PM
11. I have been a Sonics season ticket holder for four years and I am signed up for next year as well. I love the team and do not want to see them leave the area. I do not agree with putting up $200+ million to refurbish Key Arena, but can't some kind of compromise be drawn up to improve Key Arena - not just for the Sonics and Storm, but for all Key Arena events?

For the Supes, its just unfortunate that the taxpayers got stuck financing two previous sports facilities in the last decade or so. Now most people have finally had enough.

As expected, the Seattle City Council is being a bunch of dillweeds and not working very hard to get some kind of deal done. Quite frankly, I would love to see the Sonics in Bellevue or Renton.

At least when I pay the Sonics every season for my seats, I have a pretty good idea what I will get in return. With the City of Seattle and King County, I just end up supporting a bunch of overpriced, ineffective projects or programs.

Quite frankly, having Sonics tickets is one of the few things that makes living in West Seattle somewhat bearable.

Posted by: Gary on April 28, 2006 07:58 PM
12. Gary's right on this.

If Seattle (and the Sonics) had some real leadership, there would have been some solution to keeping the team here. But instead we get 200-plus million wammy, and a do-nothing council and mayor willing to sit back and watch 'em go, thinking "who needs ya!".

I dislike the stadium welfare program, and especially when the team threatens to leave. But the Super Sonics were the first major pro team here, and I have fond memories of hearing the games on my Dad's car radio (never used be on TV much back then).

Yes, the teams don't make a 1st class city, but the departure of the Sonics is yet another symptom of a city in decline (IMHO).

Posted by: Shaun on April 28, 2006 08:11 PM
13. I'm not sure KeyArena needs $200 million, but it's pretty clear the lease the Sonics have with the city needs attention. If both parties are losing money on a deal, perhaps the deal needs to be looked at for any possible and reasonable improvements.

Another question (at the risk of being too far off topic), if the Sonics go, what is to be done with the arena and the entire Seattle Center? It's not like major acts automatically flock there now, with competition from Tacoma and Everett. Maybe the city needs to get out of the arena business, based on its wonderful track record with carrying out other functions.

Posted by: moe on April 28, 2006 08:33 PM
14. I'd like to point out to LovinUSA that Cincinnati lost the Royals in 1972. I don't notice that Vancouver is having any particular difficulty because the Grizzlies left, either.

Posted by: stu on April 28, 2006 08:40 PM
15. They could move to Fife. "The Fife Sonics"

Posted by: Misty on April 28, 2006 08:55 PM
16. So long, farewell, auf Wiedersehen, good night;
So long, farewell, auf Wiedersehen, adieu;
So long, farewell, au revoir, auf wiedersehen;
YOU leave and heave a sigh and say goodbye -- Goodbye!
So long, farewell, auf Wiedersehen, goodbye
Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye!

with apologies to The Sound of Music!

Posted by: Cheryl on April 28, 2006 09:22 PM
17. Good riddance. The NBA product turned into a turd sometime in the late 80s to early 90s. Anyone who still pays to see that garbage is a fool. I'm glad to see the Sonics go, and I'm looking forward to saying goodbye to the Blazers as well.

Posted by: Jeff B. on April 28, 2006 09:39 PM
18. http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0618/keyarena.php

This is a great piece sizing up the KeyArena debate - especially the reference to Sonics ownership - whose collective personal worth tops $2 billion - yet they want to chip in a paltry 4.5 percent of a new arena's true costs (while grabbing all the profit)...

Posted by: jackman on April 29, 2006 08:10 AM
19. Wasn't the Supersonic project cancelled a while ago? Something to do with not being economically feasible?

Posted by: SouthernRoots on April 29, 2006 08:37 AM
20. If the team can't stand on its own economical feet in Seattle, let them go to a market where they can. Don't let the door hit you on the way out!

Posted by: Fed Up on April 29, 2006 09:23 AM
21. As we should remember, Key Arena was stripped to the core and redone just 10 years ago. What's to say - even IF $200 million was spent - they won't come back in another 10 years asking for more?

This ownership group knew what it was getting when it bought the team - including the lease.

I would be much more willing to 'keep' the Sonics if somebody other than the current group were in charge - or at least pull their collective heads out of their arses and get rid of the current management team ... starting with the president. As it is, it's a poorly run franchise - on year 6 of the original five-year plan - and they want $200 million to re-do a facility that's 10 years old.

Nope.

Posted by: jimg on April 29, 2006 10:19 AM
22. $200 million is about 28% of annual Seattle tax revenues. Should nearly a third of that revenue just be used to subsidize a private corporation? What about replacing the Viaduct, or is loosing the Sonics a bigger emergency?
I personally wish the people of Seattle, who seem to have never met a tax they didn't like, all the best, and I encourage you to poney up the money now, before it's too late. Because the Sonics won't be gone for five minutes before some busybody starts the campaign to bring professional basketball back to Seattle, and that is going to cost a real arm and a leg.

Posted by: Dan on April 30, 2006 12:30 PM
23. Hello people. Allow me to state the obvious. Seattle is a second class city. And being a second class city means Seattle simply can't afford to sponsor $200 million for the likes of the Sonics. It is questionable that the Mariners and Seahawks are enjoying better returns when compared to other markets. There is no question that the State is not enjoying a favorable return on the "emergency" investments made by the State taxpayers. AUDIT anyone?

It is time for the people in Emerald City to wake up. Seattle is second class and moving to third. Businesses are not flocking to the city. Seems that business owners are moving the other way. Likewise families are moving out of the city. School closing remind us of that. You have your loony leaders to thank. Seattle is FUBAR.

Posted by: Snuffy on April 30, 2006 07:28 PM
24. Hey, don't ask me that question.

I had no problem with using the Kingdome till it was paid off. I didn't mind baseball or football games there.

The Arena needed fixing 10 years ago, but it doesn't now. Pay off the debt and then let's talk.

Posted by: swatter on May 1, 2006 07:35 AM
25. I wonder when the Mariners will start crying for more upgrades to the “SAFE” because they cannot make it, now that they only draw 25,000 fans per game.

CRAP IN...CRAP OUT!!!

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on May 1, 2006 09:28 AM
26. Howyousdoin

I think we’d be better off selling the Key to da Tribes and let dem turn it into a Native Gaming Palace. I bet we would fill da place 24/7/365 and create a thousand new jobs.

Forgetaboutit

Posted by: Joey bag of doughnuts on May 1, 2006 09:34 AM
27. How many of those who are currently wetting their pants over gasoline prices… do you think endorse the idea of extorting money from taxpayers to rebuild the Key Arena?

I'll bet it's a significant %age.

It wouldn't surprise me if they also are behind Paul Allen's 'public private partnerships,' whereby the boobouisee gets to foot >90% of the bill for one asinine venture after another.

Posted by: JDH on May 1, 2006 12:23 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?