June 10, 2006
"Walking Dead" March From BV, Then: "Die-In" Planned For Bush In Medina

Well, I don't know if any of the Camp Wellstone students in Seattle the same day will be participating, but denizens of the putative Moonbat Left are planning to gather in a park near Bellevue Square and stage a "walking dead" march to the Medina home of Microsoft exec Peter Neupert Friday morning June 16 for a "die-in" to honor U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, as President George W. Bush arrives at a fundraiser for Republican U.S. Rep. Dave Reichert (WA-8th). The news is found on the Internet in several locations. It originates here, dated June 7; the online ringleader is named Kenn Dzaman. The same text shows up here and here, as well. A WA Democratic Congressional candidate expressed awareness to supporters in a Mercer Island, WA Starbucks shortly thereafter of protest plans pegged to Bush's Eastside visit, according to a reliable source. FWIW.

Dzaman sounds like a very balanced, rational fellow. Here is a letter to the editor he had published in the Seattle bird-cage liner called Eat The State in 1998, just part of his grand and voluminous Internet ouvre.

I find the culture and society of the United States to be disgusting. The United States uses an invented and imaginary power of an intellectual and social-cultural status to consume more. This "power" is something people have invented between themselves and has little correlation to actual consciousness. Being conscious is not an intellectual, cultural, or social status. I feel it is being aware of what you are consuming, and what is being created out of that consumption. People in the United States use their "status" and "intellect" to be a more privileged consumer, one whose consumption is more important than another person's. Look at Timothy McVeigh, and Kip Kinkel: they took the United States consumption ideal to its fullest education. Do not worry what it creates or what it destroys, "just do it." (Or as Nordstrom's has plastered all over its store windows, "go with the flow.")

The United States is a nation with an intellectual and social- cultural hierarchy that is based on consumption. It makes the rich consumer and the barbaric murderer media stars (i.e.: Bill Gates, Timothy McVeigh).

Good luck next Friday Kenn. I think I should let you know I'm not fooled, though: you're clearly a Rovian plant well-versed in cointelpro ops. Good work, Karl!

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at June 10, 2006 06:59 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Two thoughts:

1)Those "die-in" events are SOOO lame!


2)"I find the culture and society of the United States to be disgusting."
Friends, this is pretty much the opinion of most activist Dems, except that they are usually too afraid to say it in public (but we all sense it pretty regularly from y'all, Dems). This guy was too honest for his own good.

Posted by: Misty on June 10, 2006 07:15 PM
2. Guess that despite their claims to the contrary, some on the left do hate America. At least this nutbar is honest about it.

Posted by: Obi-Wan on June 10, 2006 07:27 PM
3. Theodore Kaczynski lives!!!!

I find the culture and society of the United States to be disgusting

I am sure he'll find Cuba more amenable, I'd even buy him a one way ticket... oh wait that's consuming... I know send in back in one of the rafts of a refugee. You know reuse, recycle... he'd be much happier in Fidel's paradise.

'Till he open his yap. Then he'd be pounding on the US interest sections door before you could say "enemy of the state."

Posted by: JCM on June 10, 2006 07:28 PM
4. Oh my! Is there any chance we could arrange these carnivals to be held once a month? We could have Hemp Day, the Fremont Circus with Lenin, the Gay Pride Parade, what am I missing? Ah, Fat Tuesday. That's the ticket.
Marginalizing the Seattle ideology is a good thing for this state.

Posted by: thatcher on June 10, 2006 07:44 PM
5. Well, it could be worse. Instead of having a " "die-in" to honor U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq," they could be having a "die-in" for Zarqawi and his ilk...

Posted by: rbb on June 10, 2006 07:46 PM
6. A die-in?! I say let 'em have it, literally.

Posted by: Full Contact Politics on June 10, 2006 08:05 PM
7. The letter to the editor that Mr. Dzaman wrote in 1998 just goes to show you that liberals have and always will hate America. Disgusting.

As for the "Die-In" event that is planned for this Friday, do they really think they are going to make a difference? Protests have not had any effect on anyone in the United States government since the American civil rights movement protests in the early 60's.

Posted by: Andrew S. on June 10, 2006 10:44 PM
8. "Liberalism is a mental disorder"
title of a book by Michael Savage

Posted by: Arnold on June 10, 2006 11:14 PM
9. Arnold, I used to think the "Liberalism is a mental disorder" thing from Savage was over the top. But then as i observed more and more unhinged liberal behavior, I began to realize---what else could it be??

And maybe we could try to help Mr. Dzaman find happiness. So, everyone---Don't consume: don't eat. Don't drive. Don't wear clothes (they DO wear out, ya' know), in short---just STAND there! After all, he must spend his days like that--otherwise he'd be (horrors!) CONSUMING!

Posted by: Misty on June 10, 2006 11:26 PM
10. What would really be great is if there was a counter protest that showed up earlier and filled the streets with true support for the troops that gave everything in Iraq/Afghanistan to protect these nutbars freedoms to protest. You know kind of like what happens everytime these nutbars try to protest out in front of FT. Lewis. This way they would not even be seen, because the MSM would not want to show how many more counter protesters there were compared to protesters (just like the last Ft Lewis one).

Posted by: TrueSoldier on June 10, 2006 11:33 PM
11. If Liberals would take the time to truely understand Aristotle;They wouldn't have the time nor inclination to stage their exhabitions.

Posted by: Arnold on June 11, 2006 12:00 AM
12. With all this planning you'd think these folks were "forward thinking" racists!

Posted by: deadwood on June 11, 2006 12:20 AM
13. Dzaman's comments are the most accurate description of the Democrats view of America I've ever seen. They should make him the spokesman for the party.

Posted by: swassociates on June 11, 2006 06:25 AM
14. I don't know that liberalism is as much a mental disorder itself as it is, rather, a manifestation (paranoia, self-aggrandizment, narcissism) of other pathologies. Just my 0.02.

What is funny, however, is that whenever I read something from someone like this individual, with an overuse of double quotes to sarcastically diminish a word (for example, in this missive: its "power", their "status", etc.), the image of Dr. Evil in his lair seems to come to my mind.

I'm thinking Kenn wears a grey suit with white shoes, and carries a cat named Mr. Bigglesworth around with him to these events -- maybe?

Posted by: FT on June 11, 2006 07:28 AM
15. leftie turd; hates America? then leave; how will he get to the protest? in his car, improved by American engineering? American gas? who supports this carbuncle? does he hate the American greenbacks in his bank? will he eat American produce & consume our goods? yea--here is a case of 'spare the rod'; spoiled snot; has no clue what lies beyond his comfy nose--how about a residence in Mogadishu?

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on June 11, 2006 08:45 AM
16. 'die-in?' how about a 'steam roller-in'? just like that Evergreen and 'now-so-lean' student protester; sure convinced me, eh?

Posted by: Jimmie-howya-doin on June 11, 2006 08:59 AM
17. It's a beautiful illustration of what liberalism is, which is, above all else, comfort. Whenever things get rough, liberals fold. They are devoid of stamina, courage of their convictions, and just plain old toughness. They yearn to do what feels good, only as long as it feels good to them, and really don't care whether it is right or wrong. Ultimate hedonists. They are certainly not the stuff that historically made our country strong.

Posted by: katomar on June 11, 2006 10:50 AM
18. An interesting idea this guy has: consuming is bad. "Consuming", I take from his context, to mean the use of products and services that you cannot provide yourself, but have exchanged your own labor for, in the abstracted form of earned money.

I propose an American anti-consumerism day, a monunent to self-sufficiency, to be held at each American's family's soonest convenience:
- Provide all the vegetables and leafy green for the day's meals from a garden of your own.
- Cut your own wood to heat your home and cook your food.
- Bake your own bread.
- Shoot, slaughter and cook an animal, and serve it up next to the greens and bread.
- Provide for your own security: shoot intruders with the same gun you use to put meat on the table.
- Erect a structure on your own land, using timber you cut yourself. I recommend an outhouse: sewage systems are consumer services. No need for a building permit, why should anyone have say in what you do on your own land?
- Place a well on your land. Water systems are consumer services. Place it carefully in relation to the outhouse. Filter the water and use it for all the day's needs. Alternatively, get your water from a rain-barrel.
- Ride a horse to work. If you do not own a horse and cannot rent one for the day, calculate what it would cost to own and keep a horse for a day, and spend no more than that on your transportation needs for that day.
- You may use electricity to light your home, but only so much as the equivalent cost of tallow candles, less the amortized daily value of household wiring and lightbulbs.
- Brew your own beer. You can start this in advance. In fact, I see no reason to stop.
- Reload your own rifle or shotgun shells.
- Educate your children at home.
- If anyone mentions taxes, reply that everything you did that day was completely without the assistence of any others, and why should anyone get a cut of what you do to provide solely for your own family? Then, shoot the intruder.
- If you need medical attention, barter with the doctor for it. Trade him some of the animal you hunted. Or provide it yourself.
- Band together with your like-minded neighbors for the common defense. If anyone comes to complain that you are collectively being self-sufficient, tell them it's none of their business. Then, shoot the intruder.
- Entertain yourself. Read a book. Play chess. Carve game pieces from bits of wood. Climb a tree. Go fishing. Bury all the idiot intruders that keep coming around to collect taxes and force you to be dependent on the collector of those taxes.
- Be sarcastic at authoritarian wolves wearing "liberal" sheepskins. It's its own reward. Also, offer them a place at the dinner table if they put in a good day of working in your garden, digging your outhouse pit, hoisting water from the well and chopping wood.

Posted by: gmcraff on June 11, 2006 11:02 PM
19. "We might think of dollars as being "certificates of performance." The better I serve my fellow man, and the higher the value he places on that service, the more certificates of performance he gives me. The more certificates I earn, the greater my claim on the goods my fellow man produces. That's the morality of the market. In order for one to have a claim on what his fellow man produces, he must first serve him."
-- Walter Williams

Posted by: JCM on June 12, 2006 05:38 AM
20. I'm not quite sure everyone is taking this how Kenn meant to convey it. I think what he's trying to get through is some/most Americans consume above and beyond what we should or need to. We buy something...say a television. A month later a "new and improved" version of this television comes out, so we throw away the previous one to buy the new one, so on and so forth. A lot of people donate such things, however our landfills are overflowing with relatively new appliances. We can financially afford to do this because everything is produced and sold at such a cheap price that sometimes it's cheaper to get something new than fix a problem with the existing item. Through this super-consumer cycle, we (unknowingly for some) become the people that I'm assuming Kenn is referring to. I think that's why he mentioned being aware of what you are consuming and realizing the consequences of that consumption. Most people don't think twice about where these items go when they throw them in the trash. Out of sight, out of mind.

So, maybe before you take one idea and run with it, perhaps consider it for a moment and you'll realize that there is a lot of truth behind what he's trying to say. Doesn't take much head scratching to figure it out.

Posted by: Eve on June 15, 2006 06:34 AM
21. I'm not quite sure everyone is taking this how Kenn meant to convey it. I think what he's trying to get through is some/most Americans consume above and beyond what we should or need to. We buy something...say a television. A month later a "new and improved" version of this television comes out, so we throw away the previous one to buy the new one, so on and so forth. A lot of people donate such things, however our landfills are overflowing with relatively new appliances. We can financially afford to do this because everything is produced and sold at such a cheap price that sometimes it's cheaper to get something new than fix a problem with the existing item. Through this super-consumer cycle, we (unknowingly for some) become the people that I'm assuming Kenn is referring to. I think that's why he mentioned being aware of what you are consuming and realizing the consequences of that consumption. Most people don't think twice about where these items go when they throw them in the trash. Out of sight, out of mind.

So, maybe before you take one idea and run with it, perhaps consider it for a moment and you'll realize that there is a lot of truth behind what he's trying to say. Doesn't take much head scratching to figure it out.

Posted by: Eve on June 15, 2006 06:35 AM
22. Oh, and before I forget...you forgot to add a very important part to the excerpt you posted:

"Needless over-consumption and the created death (or extinction) of any life (for status, consumption, or education) is barbaric; until this correlation is realized, expect more of it. You can blame the government, the military, corporations, the media, or this culture and society, but really, it is the peoples' fault. We create the environment that fosters the need for all this barbarism. Go ahead, people, consume until we all die (and blame whatever)."

There. Now it should all make sense.

Posted by: Eve on June 15, 2006 07:09 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?