"Sims says county can't afford $5 million in Sheriff's Office reforms"
The cost of implementing a package of sweeping reforms proposed for the King County Sheriff's Office -- including hiring new sergeants, providing better training for all ranks and creating an early-intervention system to deal with problem behavior -- is simply too high for a government still dealing with serious budget woes, Metropolitan King County Executive Ron Sims said Monday.Yeah, essential public services such as effective law enforcement are too expensive. But somehow King County can afford to spend millions on frivolous non-essentials such as the non-existent plan to move to forced mail voting and another half million to change the county's logo to a silhouette of Martin Luther King, Jr. Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at September 12, 2006 03:36 PM | Email This
PUKE
Posted by: Peter Vochick on September 12, 2006 04:22 PMThe truth about moon bats: http://tinyurl.com/erm2z
Posted by: Tyler Durden on September 12, 2006 04:48 PMKing County can't handle the election system that is already in place, with the majority of the errors coming from the absentee ballot handling (we may find yet another box hidden under a couch somewhere). Because of the ongoing efforts of Stefan and others, the funny business in the county election office is not going to be swept under the rug. The political affiliation of the winner is not important. Counting legitimate ballots correctly is.
Sims is an egotistical doof who is more concerned about funding pet projects rather than silly things like 911 services. Don't forget he was the one having the tantrums about the council questioning his need for a luxury penthouse office. It's too bad many voters automatically vote for candidates with certain party affiliations without thinking.
Posted by: Burdabee on September 12, 2006 05:21 PMIs the reason he does not want to move back into the KC Court House because he knows just how 'good' the new earth quake supports will stand up to the next one? He has no qualms in having a KC officer accompany him (which he does not pay for) for his own protection, however the safety of citizens is 'too expensive'?
Thank goodness this is not his decision!
The translation is, "This looks like it might be a good excuse to raise taxes."
Posted by: Bit32 on September 12, 2006 08:10 PM1) An effective sheriff's office, or the Native Plant Salvage Program? http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/pi/salopps.htm
2) An effective sheriff's office, or salmon watching? http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/waterres/salmon/index.htm
3) An effective sheriff's office, or the "Green globe award program"? http://dnr.metrokc.gov/grnglobe/index.htm
4) An effetive sheriff's office, or licensing Fluffy and Fido? http://www.metrokc.gov/animals/licenses/
5) An effective sheriff's office, or protecting people from "expressing themselves"? http://www.metrokc.gov/health/apu/
6) An effective sheriff's office, or sculptures of fish? http://www.soundtransit.org/x3302.xml
Just wondering...
Posted by: Taxpayer on September 12, 2006 08:39 PMHe seems to come with some reason or another not to fund public safety heading into and election cycle, go figure.
My favorite was after $30 car tabs passed Sims saying, "the people voted for less fire and police protection."
I am still waiting for the response to my public artwork submission. Awhile back they solicited for art in the Shoreline transfer station (yes art in a dump). I submitted designs for a sculpture visible on I5.
A hand with middle finger raised entitled; "Ron Sims message to the taxpayers."
I never even got a notice that my proposal had been received. So much for open minded selection committees.
The man sickens me.
Posted by: JCM on September 12, 2006 09:01 PMLooks to me like Ron and The Mayor of Seattle been eatin a few too many of them Dick's burgers....erp.
I'll bet we're buyin them too!
Posted by: GS on September 12, 2006 11:03 PMWell Ron, it didn't much matter what goverment paid for furniture was in the twin towers now did it.
What a joke!
Posted by: GS on September 13, 2006 12:49 AMand--when was the last time anyone in Seattle "found" money for any pet project by simply CUTTING another program? do we need a diversity department? how about bi-lingual bureaucracies? cutting art? and as noted earlier--that logo thing--what a joke;
Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on September 13, 2006 06:40 AMI think it is about time for a Seattle Tea Party... we can through the Politicians in the Sound instead of tea.... just a thought.
my question is how do these dufuses (or is that 'dufii' for plural) manage their own checkbooks? don't they say 'no' to stupid personal things? seems inconsistent--unless "it's not MY money"
Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on September 13, 2006 08:41 PM