February 28, 2007
Boeing News Roundup

Some articles of note from the last several days:

-Thomas Lifson at the American Thinker continues his in-depth look at the troubles confronting Airbus. Short story, the role of politicians in the Airbus decision-making process presents the company with real challenges, even before one considers further convolution if Russia is welcomed on board as a desperately needed capital partner.

-The AP reports on what appears to be growing interest in the new and improved version of the 747. Combined with Lifson's column it's clear the 747-8 freighter has taken its A380 counterpart to the cleaners and now threatens the passenger version of the A380 as well, even though the A380 and 747-8 aren't truly direct competitors.

-Back at Airbus, long overdue, serious cost-cutting measures have finally been announced after some political turmoil, but affected labor unions are none to thrilled.

-Meanwhile, the P-I recently posed a reminder that while Airbus flounders, the pressure remains on Boeing to deliver the the 787 as promised.

Worrying about the unexpected: With Boeing's 787 Dreamliner entering a critical time, Mike Bair, vice president and general manager of the program, has said it is the unexpected that he is most worried about -- something beyond Boeing's control.

With rollout of the first 787 due in July, and first flight in late August, Boeing has been rushing engineering resources to its partners in Italy and Japan to help keep the program on track for delivery of the first 787 to All Nippon Airways of Japan in May 2008.

But what would happen if an autoclave blew up? These are the giant ovens that Boeing's partners in Japan, Italy, South Carolina and Kansas are using to bake the composite wings and fuselage barrels of the Dreamliner.

What if a critical tooling machine broke?

"It is those kinds of things that keep you up because you can't plan for them," Bair has said.

Posted by Eric Earling at February 28, 2007 07:31 PM | Email This
Comments
1. The biggest breaker of machines, both commercial and military, is politics. As long as the political pinheads are deprived of a role, success is assured.

Airbus is doomed despite a potentially reasonable product.

Posted by: Fed Up on February 28, 2007 08:05 PM
2. Fed Up

Don't be so sure. My son works at Boeing/Everett (engineer) and if you think the company doesn't have big problems, let me sell you a nice tunnel in Seattle.

PS Boeing does a bunch of work with RUSSIA already.
Not saying that AirBust isn't in trouble, but as my son has said too may times. Boeing is paying a heavy price for out-sourcing.

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on February 28, 2007 09:09 PM
3. Boeing played Airbus, and then let Airbus deliver a sucker punch to itself called the A380. The press releases, the misdirection, the fake marketing stategy - Boeing wanted Airbus to commit to the A380.

That plane was doomed from the start, and anyone that has taken a good look at the market assumptions it was based on and the obsolete technology shoved into it will back me up on that.

We have another name for Airbus - "Death Spiral"...

Posted by: H Moul on February 28, 2007 09:28 PM
4. Almost ten years back Bill Gates' Dad did a study that propounded that aerospace would be a declining part of the Puget Sounds commerce and that Microsoft and software will take up the slack.

Well, since then we've had the Internet Tech Bust and now with Vista being a complete flop and revenues and MSFT stock prices declining, it looks like Boeing had the last laugh.

It's a victory of 3-D technology vs 2-D technology.

Posted by: John Bailo on March 1, 2007 12:42 AM
5. Would someone please ask Al Bore to send some WARMING my way. Come on I have 6" on snow in my driveway!!

LOL

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on March 1, 2007 07:25 AM
6. Boeing is no different than any other self serving large "American" company. Outsource everything, maximize upper managers compensation plans. Airbus is the same way, except if you look at their overall model they are the very model of socialism. I work for a large aero firm in Redmond (guess). Our edict is to send most of our work to India or WangaBanga someplace is the Asian jungle. Ship it to folks who work all day for a bowl of curry rice and fire hundreds in the process here in the states! The companies don't want to be American firms, but GLOBAL firms. The first to sign up for global government. With only two major commercial aircraft suppliers, they both know they can do whatever they please. You can thank two things for the demise of American companies. Globalist like Bushie Sr setting the stage and labor unions that make overseas export of their jobs quite attractive.

Posted by: pbs7mm on March 1, 2007 07:38 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?