March 13, 2007
Legislative Round-up

Rep. Sam Hunt and the Democrats are seeking to unilaterally cancel the 2008 Presidential Primary. (because they prefer smoke-filled rooms, or something)

Rep. Eileen Cody and the Democrats are trying to impose Soviet-style healthcare and eliminate market choices (silly me, I thought Cody was pro-choice!)

The Senate Democrats are still trying to force the Secretary of State to toss valid signatures on initiative petitions into the trash.

The House voted to eliminate the super-majority requirement for school levy votes (because it's good to live in a Marxist kleptocracy where a vote to confiscate somebody else's property is morally equivalent to a vote to keep ones own property)

The Democrats are moving the income tax through the Senate.

And the Democrats aren't satisfied with existing vote fraud. The Senate just passed election-day voter registration!

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 13, 2007 05:29 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Keep it up guys! You can only push us so far until we revolt. Although luckily we won't have to since 2008 is just around the corner. Governor Rossi, come to our aid!

Posted by: WamFuzzyPuppies on March 13, 2007 05:39 PM
2. Pitchfork and torches!
Tar and feathers!
Out of town on a rail!

Posted by: JCM on March 13, 2007 06:07 PM
3. This state is totally out of control. They bypass 601 with a emergency clause that turns out not to be, they want to shove a state income tax on us even though the budget surplus is predicted to be a record high, they want to stop the initative process so we can't overturn any of their nonsense. They are running amok and the bubble is going to burst soon. People need to stand up and stop this madness.

Posted by: DaveG on March 13, 2007 06:14 PM
4. Dept. of Double Standards:

If an otherwise legal vote is incorrectly tabulated, it is an "illegal vote". But if an otherwise legal petition signature is incorrectly filed, it is a "valid signature".

If a vote on the viaduct is advisory, it's a waste of valuable tax dollars. But if a presidential primary is advisory, someone who wants to cancel it must favor smoke-filled rooms.

Taxes for the Iraq war are spreading democracy. But taxes for schools are Marxist confiscation.

I must just be missing something.

Posted by: Bruce on March 13, 2007 06:33 PM
5. Yes, Bruce, a brain.

Posted by: katomar on March 13, 2007 06:38 PM
6. I second, katomar.

Posted by: G Jiggy on March 13, 2007 06:45 PM
7. Right, requiring a majority vote for education like everything else aside from constitutional amendments is somehow marxist. And canceling a meaningless primary (the parties only look to the caucuses) to save money is somehow bad. I thouhgt you guys didn't like wasting money and subverting the majority for the minority.

Posted by: Giffy on March 13, 2007 06:48 PM
8. They are absolutely DRUNK with this larger-majority power.

Posted by: Michele on March 13, 2007 06:50 PM
9. "Rep. Gary Alexander introduced a bill to require a public review period for the budget, but the Democrats won't even give the bill a public hearing."
Another example of flipping the bird to their constituents instead of serving them because they are arrogant enough to believe that they know better. Their actions also show that they want to make easier to vote illegally - with politicians like that in power, how can you trust ?

and there's more...Jacobsen and other Dems in the legislature also would like to do away with the Initiative process, so they can do their business without intervention by the people who elected them. People clearly don't want the Income Tax, yet it is moving through the Senate ?? That is the height of arrogance and smacks of old Soviet style politics. All of this is documented.

Posted by: KS on March 13, 2007 06:55 PM
10. "requiring a majority vote for education like everything else aside from constitutional amendments is somehow marxist": Yes, but you forgot to mention that it's both Marxist and kleptocratic.

I agree that an education tax should not have a higher bar than other taxes. Every tax should require a supermajority.

Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky on March 13, 2007 06:55 PM
11. The biggest reason for a SuperMajority on these School Levies is many voters/property owners do not pay or pay only a portion of the Levy because of the Senior Exemption. There are other exemptions too....which means Property Tax Levy's are SHIFTED to the rest of us.
The other problem is ignorant renters.....who do not realize that higher taxes ===Higher Rents!
Oh...and school personnel also get to vote to increase the size of the tub of Bureaucratic Goo they get to dip their greedy hands into.

Stefan is right....Marxist Kleptocracy.
Perfect description.

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on March 13, 2007 07:30 PM
12. We should impliment a 60% majority before another tax happy democrap can be elected, opps sorry recounted into office.

I third your motion katamor

Posted by: GS on March 13, 2007 09:02 PM
13. The scarey thing is that the items Stefan listed to start this thread are just the tip of the iceberg, of what the RADLOEBGS would really LIKE to do (that's ''Radical Left-wing Obstructionist Eco-extremist Big Government Socialists''; pronounced ''rad-lowey-bigs'' (your acronym for the day) ).

Posted by: Methow Ken on March 13, 2007 09:26 PM
14. [sigh]

I'm really disappointed in our dear Democrats in Olympia.

To be corrupt and idiotic is expected. But to be corrupt, idiotic, timid and incompetent is just sad.

They've got bloody near a supermajority -- why piddle around? Why simply make more exceptions to the Public Disclosure Act when you can outlaw news coverage? Why require 50% for a school levy when it's *for the children*? Why not just require 25% of the people to care about investing in the future of our state with a program of modest contributions from those who have been luckiest in life's lottery? Why pass an income tax legislatively when they could simply have their friends among the Supremes, while ruling on a completely unrelated case, happen to drop a phrase into the versict about the unconstitutionality of *not* having an income tax? Why set up the budget to run a huge deficit in two years when they could just rig the budget numbers today? And why simply edge up taxes when you can just confiscate 100% of the wealth of people you don't like? Why bother rigging elections when you can just cancel them?

No imagination. No guts. Makes for a poor movie script, I'm afraid.

Posted by: TB on March 13, 2007 09:38 PM
15. Election-day voter registration? Does that mean that MoveOn.org will be changing its name to MoveIn.org?

Posted by: ewaggin on March 13, 2007 09:55 PM
16. Kleptocracy? Did you coin that, Stefan? NICE!!!

Posted by: Peggy U on March 13, 2007 10:18 PM
17. Californi-Euro here we come!
new state motto: "Everything for Everyone!"

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on March 14, 2007 04:08 AM
18. I say the name for the election day voter registration bill should be called the ACORN Bill.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on March 14, 2007 08:41 AM
19. Stefan, you forgot that Cody is pro-choice on the Soviet-style health care plan. The choice is:

1. Soviet-style health care plan

(pick one)

Just like Soviet citizens could "vote" in elections. Never mind you only had one "choice".

Posted by: Interested Observer on March 15, 2007 11:35 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?