Today the House committee passed (party-line) a substantially worse version of SB 5566 , now prohibiting the copying not only of mail ballot envelopes, but also other voter signatures. Ranking Republican Rep. Bruce Chandler's amendment, which would criminalize misuse of voter information, without prohibiting copying, was rejected.
The Democrats seem determined to prevent disclosure of negligently(fraudulently?) counted ballots, such as this absentee+provisional pair from November 20041.
1"I think we have been a model to the rest of the nation and the world at large about how an election system, as close as this one is, can be done with the highest of quality...This is the biggest display of democracy I have ever seen and I am proud of it and I think it's an inspiration."
Remember the thread about the Democratic Party activist being investigated for signing his wife's ballot?
http://soundpolitics.com/archives/008100.html
Here is an update.
Due to conflicts of interest, the Democrat Jefferson County Prosecutor turned it over to Clallam County. Now 6 weeks into the investigation, Pt. Townsend Police have been forced to do require a Search Warrant of the husband's signature. It has been sent to a lab which will take 1-9 MONTHS to analyze.
Take a look folks. Remember, these are Democratic Party Activists....big-time.
Now folks, lets just speculate on what could possibly be the rational explanation of the accused........ Remember, his wife both CALLED the Auditor's Office to report she did not vote her ballot AND also wrote a note & signed that she did not vote her ballot. And remember, his ballot & her ballot were apparently both HAND-DELIVERED to the Auditors Office on the SAME DAY.
The only explanation is that someone broke into their home/mailbox, stole the wife's ballot, signed it in what appears to be the husband's handwriting AND just happened to deliver it to the Auditor's Office the same day the accused husband delivered his.
WHAT A F*CKING COINCIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please everyone...take a look at this thread again & the evidence. Yet this guy is apparently "lawyering up" to fight the allegation. This man is a Democratic Party Activist!!! He ought to know better, huh???
If he is illegally signing ballots, how deep is the problem???
You be the judge.
More to come on this one Stefan....we just might have to wait another 9 months.
nor Schram, nor Danny or Nicole or other idiots Posted by: righton on March 30, 2007 04:15 PM
fraud, I came across this story
about a Democrat committeeman named "Swamp Dog" convicted of crimes in East St. Louis
The summation could probably be used in every state in the union:
"So,... what what can we learn from the "Swamp Dog" story?"
"1. "Swamp Dog" swindles money from the poor with bad credit ratings in East St. Louis.
2. "Swamp Dog" donates time and money to democrat party as a committeeman.
3. Poor people in East St. Louis vote democrat.
4. "Swamp Dog" goes to prison.
5. Poor people in East St. Louis vote democrat."
There has to be something wrong with voting for people that are in favor of voter fraud. That are stealing your freedom.
Why doesn't that lab employ signature verifiers from our elections groups? They can absolutely verify a signature in only a few minutes.
Shark if you disclosure, ballot information count on me for a contribution to the defense fund.
Posted by: JCM on March 31, 2007 07:55 AM