April 30, 2007
It's in the P-I

In today's column, contumelious liberal columnist Joel Connelly interviews Democrat presidential contender John Edwards:

Edwards described as "deeply troublesome" the sudden firing of eight U.S. attorneys -- including John McKay in Seattle -- with unfolding evidence of political and ideological motives.

"It's clear the decisions to fire were based purely on political motivation," Edwards said. "Part of that motivation was their decision not to prosecute so-called 'voter fraud,' which is a code word for voter suppression.

"What they really want to do is to suppress turnout by Democrats and (minority voters) at the polls. Is that justice?"

Edwards' accusation of minority voter suppression isn't as hysterical as it seems -- there is one minority whose votes the Republicans wish to suppress -- the minority which votes more than once or votes when not legally eligible to vote. But I can understand why Connelly would tirade against suppressing the votes of ineligible voters!

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 30, 2007 04:04 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I had read the article and almost choked.

The Rs need to learn from the Ds. They are too polite and proper.

You see, you tell a lie often enough and sincerely enough and you can get away with murder. That is the D strategy- just reread this Edwards thing, a Clinton tirade or any number of lies the Ds are putting out.

Come on, Edwards, read up on the Wolfowitz thing. While we are at it, read up on the Gonzales things.

And while we are at it, why do you guys, Breck boy, want to continue a corrupt election system? Why do you want people to have the right to register on election day?

Posted by: swatter on April 30, 2007 04:14 PM
2. Joel Connelly---
Never held accountable by his pathetic employer for thumbing his nose at the Voter Registration laws.
I guess fat guys like Connelly figure they are entitled to 1 vote for every 200 pounds!

Posted by: aaargh on April 30, 2007 04:19 PM
3. You see, you tell a lie often enough and sincerely enough and you can get away with murder. That is the D strategy

True, but the R's use it too. I don't think lying through your teeth to achieve your end goal is party exclusive. Richard Nixon was really good at lying till he got caught.

Posted by: Cato on April 30, 2007 04:24 PM
4. Cato: So was Bill. Remember? He was impeached for perjury. Better yet, how about enough past history and sticking to something relevant to current politics?

Posted by: katomar on April 30, 2007 04:32 PM
5. Mr John Edwards--

why do you have such an obsessively big house? i love capitalism & bless your success, but dont have a double standard with me, you fake.

how many homeless have you sponsored in tent cities on YOUR OWN land? why? security guards shag them off? do you open your house up to charity? do you house illegal aliens to help the poor? & support them?

do you & your kind feel any guilt for ruining the medical profession & professionals with rampant excessive lawsuits? having doctors second guessing themselves at every turn? & taking extra useless tests just to cover their arses?

dont lecture me, Johnny E. YOU are part of the problem. sue sue sue. no sensiblities. "it's not my money, man!" yes--it IS!

no responsibilities for behavior. government & juries pay all. works for all except anyone digging into YOUR PERSONAL nest egg, eh?

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on April 30, 2007 04:35 PM
6. cato, comment on the comment and don't make stuff up.

cato, I can tell you one thing today for free- a Republican today is not the same as a Republican 35 years ago, and a Democrat today would be considered a socialist/communist 35 years ago. You guys have lowered the bar.

Comment on the blasted article. Is Edwards a liar and allowed to get away with it or what?

Posted by: swatter on April 30, 2007 04:43 PM
7. Wanna get rid of all Democrats? Literacy test...it will get them every time! That and disenfranchising anyone who pays $400 for a haircut. My man, Ed, down at the Laurelhurst Barbor Shop charges only $23, and that's still highway robbery!

The Piper

Posted by: Piper Scott on April 30, 2007 05:20 PM
8. Edwards and the Dems love to perpetuate the big lie of Republican voter "suppression". I remember how they trotted that lie out the very next day after the 2000 election--remember that word they kept using? "Disenfranchised". None of their made up charges were ever proven as far as I know.

Edwards and the rest of these phonies most certainly would like to keep folks ignorant of the very real history of voter suppression in the South by their own party.

Posted by: Bill Cruchon on April 30, 2007 05:33 PM
9. Just noticed...From Jimmy, "i love capitalism & bless your success..."

John Edwards isn't a capitalist; he's a trial attorney. The one is a creator of wealth, while the other is a leech who sucks it away from the creator.

Keep this distinction in mind...there will be a test later...

The Piper

Posted by: Piper Scott on April 30, 2007 05:34 PM
10.
Here's the paradox.

Bush HIRED these guys and also fired them.

So, if you think they're so great, shouldn't you be praising Bush for hiring them in the first place? I mean, if these fired guys are so great, then Bush must have been a genius to hire them.

And then, since Bush is a genius, he must have had a good reason for firing them.

Or, if you think they're not that good, then Bush must be a genius for firing those not-so-good attorneys.

Once again, Dum-O-Crat Defeatists are illogical.

Posted by: John Bailo on April 30, 2007 05:52 PM
11. Maybe Joel is thinking of the 92,000 legitimate voters Jeb Bush kicked off the voter rolls in Florida in 2000.

Oh well, one person voting twice in Washington State is far worse than 92,000 legitimate voters being kicked off the rolls by caging lists right?

God if only the Supreme Court did not appoint the lying chimp, and let the recount conclude. America would have billions less enemies, and billions more people committed to ending jihadist terror, instead of wanting to see our arrogant asses attacked.

Posted by: Facts on April 30, 2007 05:56 PM
12. swatter, I have an idea. When we are reading up on the Wolfowitz thing, we should read the part where he said the Iraqis could pay for their own reconstruction, and the war was only going to cost 3 billion dollars.

Imagine. Someone that thought the Iraq war was only gonna cost us taxpayers 3 billion dollars being put in charge of a bank.

Only in bushworld.

By the way. What John Edwards flushes down the toilet every morning would make a better president than the top 3 GOP candidates put together.

Posted by: Facts on April 30, 2007 06:11 PM
13. Arrogant asses attacked. Wasn't that film written up in this weekend's Movie Times?

Posted by: Organization Man on April 30, 2007 06:22 PM
14. #11, "Maybe Joel is thinking of the 92,000 legitimate voters Jeb Bush kicked off the voter rolls in Florida in 2000."

If that was true the mainstream media would have been all over it. As far as I know that's just another Democrat lie that has not been substantiated.

Posted by: Bill Cruchon on April 30, 2007 06:23 PM
15. Bill, you mean the main stream media that is owned by defense contractors, and disney? Huge corporations that would broadcast anything if it meant lower taxes, and higher profits to them. The truth be damned.

As far as the comment "arrogant asses attacked" I was referring to Bush's my way or the highway attitude, along with his unwillingness to use any diplomacy at any level with anyone.

"You are either with us or you are with the terrorists" language is along the same lines of arrogance that is truly offensive to many people.

I will help you out a little here. There are actually people on this planet that don't think it is America's right to lie about 3rd world dictators, and directly, or indirectly kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people that get in the way of the expansion of our empire.

Many people after witnessing the carnage in Iraq nightly on their televisions understand the death and destruction is 100% Bush, and his supporter's fault. We are responsible for their security, and we blew it from before the beginning in every way possible. By the way, I am no Saddam fan, but there is a difference between him killing his own people, and through total incompetence on our part, allowing them to kill each other openly, and on a daily basis.

Just remember the American People are too squeamish to view the blasted apart bodies, the victims of the suicide bombers, or the IED's. Believe me, the rest of the word gets to see the decapitated bodies, and the tortured torsos.

Heck, Americans can't even view the flag draped coffins returning by the dozens every week.

I know very few understand the true meaning of the term "blowback", but there are a few people on this planet that don't think god is George Bush.

Posted by: Facts on April 30, 2007 06:54 PM
16. You're ranting and going off-topic, Facts, as liberals are prone to doing when they are caught playing fast and lose with the truth.

If you are trying to say that the mainstream media slants to the right, you probably should seek professional help.

Posted by: Bill Cruchon on April 30, 2007 07:08 PM
17. John Edwards is a skilled liar and persistent at telling it over and over again so those like Facts and DM will swear to it. In reality, he is an ambulence chasing, schister lawyer who has the ethics of Bill Clinton.

Sane and mentally competent people can see through that, but the unhinged left (~25% of the population of this country & maybe 40% of King County) secular progressives (retrogressives) buy his bull crap. Those sickos who do IMHO, want to see this country lose its tradition and become more like Cuba or Venezuela.

Posted by: KS on April 30, 2007 07:32 PM
18. "Deeply troublesome." How nice. And was he similarly troubled over Clinton's firing of ALL the US Attorneys? I'm sure there was no political motivation there, at all. No, certainly not.

To democrats, vote fraud seems to be a right. sorry, it isn't! Clean elections are a right. Lazy, look-the-other-way attorneys aren't.

Posted by: Michele on April 30, 2007 07:49 PM
19. If there's one true requirement to join the club of the left, be good little (or huge) cultural Marxist, etc., it is pure unwavering arrogance. Connelly demonstrates that with aplomb.

Only a deeply troublesome person like Connelly could write sanctimoniously about protecting voters, and also allow his own property to be used as the residence address for people that don't live in WA, but would like to vote her and influence the outcome of our elections.

Posted by: Jeff B. on April 30, 2007 09:38 PM
20. Sorry this is way off topic, but Stefan, what's with the new orange "O" favicon?

Posted by: Jeff B. on April 30, 2007 10:09 PM
21. The issue is not voters, it is votes. It always has been about votes. Every corrupt system needs votes not voters. Low-income communities and immigrant communities are courted for their votes not voters. Most dem candidates fly in private planes and Edwards has $400 haircuts. Even when it is for the "little people" it is about personal power. What is going to help low-income people is learning to truly excercise their franchise and learning how to work the systems themselves not having voting parties or absentee ballot parties deliver votes to candidates that don't deliver on promises. Big city nachines have delivered votes for decades and the rural and dead vote in Louisiana is legendary. The counter to the suppress argument is to ask Acorn and Move-on why they don't devote the same resources to teaching people how to register and vote correctly as is devoted to lawsuits. The real answer is someone needs to become a rising star in progressive legal circles and the nitty gritty of teaching people to fish is really hard and not very glamorous.

Posted by: WVH on May 1, 2007 12:44 AM
22. Fiction, once again you have scored your own goal and proved the point of the Stefan post. Congrats!!

When people like yourself lie about Wolfowitz and claim a scandal at World Bank, W.s current job, you get called on it. Instead of admitting a lie and moving on, you ascerbate it by trying to circumvent the discussion by discussing something or the other the guy did in a previous job.

And so, the lie gets perpetuated. So now, the Breck boy can nonchalantly make these lies without blinking and his audience believes what he says. In this case, Connely.

Fiction, point is that I, too, thought there was a scandal there but after reading the various reports, it is obvious the guy is being setup by the people he is demanding accountability from for World Bank loans.

So, instead of praising the guy for trying to get a handle on corruption, you ridicule the guy for some trumped up charge and fall for the lie being perpetuated.

Is it any wonder people think Democrats and Socialists are destroying the country?

Posted by: swatter on May 1, 2007 07:06 AM
23. Bush doesn't have to have a reason to fire US Attorneys. They work at the pleasure of the President. He could fire them, just to fire them. There is nothing illegal or improper about the firings. The Bush team mishandled the whole thing, as soon as someone cried foul the administration should have said, "The President can fire attorneys anytime, anywhere for no reason. There will be no further comment and we are not going to give congress squat. End of story."

What I would have loved t see Bush do is every time a D squawked about the firings, fire another, particular ones that Ds had sponsored.

Posted by: JCM on May 1, 2007 07:32 AM
24. These "attorneys" clearly did not prosecute as directed.

They should have been fired.

Everyone now sees it.

The Defeat-O-Crats once again dig their own grave, and Harry "run away" Reid has the shovel.

Posted by: John Bailo on May 1, 2007 09:41 AM
25. katomar @ 4, I know Bill was. That's why I'm saying it's not party exclusive. You want more recent examples? Sure, how about the leadership denying they knew about Mark Foley. How about Bush denying any connection with Jack Abramoff even though the White House logs show they we're semi-chummy.

Lying is a fact of life in politics and by no means is it exclusive to the Dem's.

Posted by: Cato on May 1, 2007 09:54 AM
26. Bill @ 8:
Edwards and the Dems love to perpetuate the big lie of Republican voter "suppression".

Ummm....yeah no the Republican Party would ever hire someone to jam the phones lines to stop people from getting rides to the voting booth. Never.

Give me a freaking break, both sides play dirty. The GOP is just as dirty and corrupt as the Dem's.

Posted by: Cato on May 1, 2007 10:01 AM
27. You're wrong there, cato. The Ds have raised the stink to new levels. The Rs are too nice and gentile.

Posted by: swatter on May 1, 2007 10:09 AM
28. Swatter, you are totally correct. It always amazes me when someone tells me to try reasoning with these libs with a nicer tone.

One thing I have come to understand about these mouth running libs is that they cannot be reasoned with. The only thing that they are good for is being used as an example to those who have not figured out the left yet.

They engage in smear tactics continually. They assasinate peoples characters with impunity. They get away with things that no centrist or right of center person would ever get away with.

They eat their own when they stray from the party line, remember Joe Lieberman anybody?

When you actually get one to admit that one of their previously held points of view is incorrect, the following day they will invariably be back to the same conclusion as though you had never convinced them of anything.

Once they start to lose the argument, they change topics without ever really answering your question. You can repeat the question till your blue in the face and they won't answer.

They have no problem using foul language with you, but if you do with them, they all of a sudden get pious on you.

I'm sick of the double standard of the left. Being nice to them is a waste of time. They are the enemy of freedom and the American dream.

Yeah, go on, hold yourself to a higher standard. It changes nothing. This is war, and war is ugly. Time to fight.

Posted by: REBEL on May 1, 2007 10:15 AM
29. It is difficult for me to tell either side what their tactics should be, I am an indie. How about this, push for rules that apply to everyone, but are not unconstituional. The attempt should be to make elections fair and uncorrupt. One poster mentioned in jest, a literacy test, that is not constitutional. But, registration rules that allow the election department a sufficient time to verify valid voters, proof of citizenship, and election procedures which are designed to prevent and reduce fraud are. There is nothing wrong with ex-felons voting if they have served their sentence, paid court costs, and paid retitution.
One party rule, no matter the party is not good. Both parties in one party situations take advantage. Now, for the handlers that say low-income people and people of color are incapable of getting either a driver's license, id card from the licensing department or assistance in geting their birth certificate to prove identity, that is the same b.s. of low expectations that has made public schools so effective in educating these same groups. /s/ To this comment I say you are not interested in making people productive members of this society, you are just intersted in mining votes. Why not in that case give votes to pets if that is all you care about?

Posted by: WVH on May 1, 2007 10:51 AM
30. They engage in smear tactics continually. They assassinate peoples characters with impunity

Uh Huh, and Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth was what, a focus group? How about when the GOP ran the smear campaign against McCain in the 2000 South Carolina primary? God forbid the chosen one (Bush) actually loose the primary in an important southern state.

Like I said, both sides play dirty. Welcome to the state of modern politics. What a sad state of affairs it's become.

Posted by: Cato on May 1, 2007 11:17 AM
31. Hey Cato, as someone who served during that time I was glad to see Kerry got nailed. As we have ALL seen. Kerry just can't tell the truth.

I'm still waitting see the CIA guy who gave him his hat. No really!

I remember what he said AFTER he came back from NAM. My guess you were to young or not around at all.

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on May 1, 2007 11:35 AM
32. Cato;

As far as I can tell the stuff the swift boaters said was true. They didn't make anything up or blow it out of proportion like the lefty media does. They didn't have the support of most of the media either.

Can't say I know much about the 2000 S Carolina primary. I'm no Bush lover, however, in the last election nobody was very worthy especially the choices the Dem's offered. It was a real nose holder.

Posted by: REBEL on May 1, 2007 12:12 PM
33. My guess you were to young or not around at all.

Yes, I was too young...didn't come of age till well after Nam was over.

Posted by: Cato on May 1, 2007 12:14 PM
34. Anyone here read RFK's article in Rolling Stone last year claiming the GOP stole Ohio?

One of his primary claims in the article is that any effort to follow the law in such a way that would restrict someone's ability to vote was meant to suppress legitimate voters.

So if don't fill out your voter registration card correctly, and so you have to fix it before you can vote (which you can do at the polls), then you were a Democrat whose right to vote was being suppressed by the Republicans. Even if you did vote.

If you did not vote for a certain number of years and the Democrats in charge of your election office purged your record and notified you, according to state law, then you were a Democrat whose right to vote was being suppresed by the Republicans. Even if you reregistered and did vote.

This is the kind of nonsense you see from the left, and it is as predictable as it is sad. My brother-in-law's father-in-law was a civil rights activist in Mississippi in the 60s. He fought for the right of blacks to be properly represented. He was one of two at-large delegates of the Mississippi Freedom Democrat Party to the 1964 Democratic National Convention. He is a lifelong Democrat. And he tells me that voting by mail and not requiring identification and not puring the rolls and so on are some of the easiest methods to exploit to commit voter fraud. That is true voter suppression: having any election without integrity, without rules, without checks.

But if you try to have a good election with integrity, the left accuses you of being racist and trying to suppress votes. Even if you have a scar on your face, courtesy of the KKK, because of your civil rights activism in the 60s.

It's enough to make you want to spit.

Oh, and while I am at it, thanks to our state's county auditors who unanimously (according to SnoCo's Auditor, Carolyn Diepenbrock) fought to defeat election day voter registration.

Election integrity is not a partisan issue. But you wouldn't know it based on the rhetoric and policies of many (thankfully, not all, but in WA, far too many) Democrats, who do everything they can to demolish all traces of the integrity of our election systems.

Posted by: pudge on May 1, 2007 05:35 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?