October 26, 2007
Reporters ask the least interesting things

I generally try to avoid commenting about the foibles of my fellow press jackals. Glass houses, burning bridges, that sort of thing. Plus I'm a native Washingtonian; because of my breeding I'm usually pretty laid back.

Yesterday, though, all my buttons were pushed and folks got on the fighting side of me. Nothing gets me more upset than when people in my chosen profession make a total mockery of the institution of journalism by their inept actions. It was a combination of reading Postman on Politics, which I do about four times a month - boring writer - compounded by jostling with the press corps after Dino Rossi's campaign kickoff in Issaquah.

First off I'll roll up the newspaper and swat the Time's senior political reporter David Postman over the nose for his comments yesterday chastising Dino Rossi and his staff. They wouldn't give him the text of his kickoff speech on Wednesday, the day before Rossi was due to give it. Now Postman has developed an inferiority complex thinking that the Rossi camp is out to get him. (The entire text of the speech is posted below for conservative and liberal readers alike to borrow, read, steal).

Of note. Every journalist who showed up at the Village Theater was personally handed a text of Rossi's speech. They were met by the candidate's fetching blonde-haired, blue-eyed flack, Jill Strait. She informed everyone of the candidate's availability to speak afterwards and where. Standard stuff.

So why wasn't Postman given a copy of the speech? It's because apparently he was too busy to be bothered about covering the start of the most important - and probably tightest - statewide race in 2008 and he just didn't want to drive out to Issaquah.

Here's a bit of advice David. Get your lazy, dead ass out from behind your desk and have shoe leather hit pavement. If the Issaquah Press has the chops to send someone over to cover this, if the Everett Herald can send a guy through morning I-405 traffic you've got no excuse. Not to talk about the embarrassment. Don't have a ride? Give me a call. We could carpool and croon along to our favorite Glen Campbell songs on the radio.

It was rather shocking that Postman would flip-out about not getting preferential treatment with the release. So the Rossi camp is supposed to give the Times the scoop on the speech and flip-the-bird to the Post-Intelligencer, News Tribune, Spokesman Review, Olympian, Everett Herald and every television and radio outlet in the state? Just so Postman can look good and be the first one to post about it on his blog? No flack in the world is going to do that. It's amateur hour to expect otherwise.

Of course the reason he was mad is because Postman is your standard press release political reporter - the type I've been fighting my entire news career to overcome. You look at the majority of his coverage and its re-hashed press releases, fundraising numbers, or opinion poll results. To be fair he also comments on what bloggers write; which is about as sad as seeing Gary Coleman in a Check 'n Go commercial.

I'm not just picking on Postman here; most of political reporting in this state is done the same way. Read a political story in your paper? It's in there because a flack faxed or e-mailed the notice the day before and like every good hack reporter they get led around by the nose following the lead.

Evidence you say? Case exhibit one is all the coverage about Dino Rossi's announcement. This news was coming down the line louder than a locomotive on crushed glass. Everyone knew it was happening. If you put your ears to the track you'd hear that the actual date had even been postponed a few times. So why no word? Apparently no one sent a fax.

There's also the sad fact that the majority of political reporters locally don't know jack about the comings and goings and behind the scenes maneuvering in the Republican Party. And from what I've seen, they aren't much wiser about the Democrats either.

That's the first half of the story but it gets worse. Before the press scrum after Rossi's speech a few of the "senior political writers" were talking about how they were surprised Dino was even going to run. Postman wrote on Oct. 22 that he thought there was only a fifty-fifty chance that Dino was going to run. Ummm... Yeah...

You might love him. Or you might not. But talk to Rossi face to face like a man and you could see that he's been hungry for a rematch for three years. Everyone in this state, and their brother Darryl and their other brother Darryl knew he was going to run. About the only way a rematch wouldn't happen is if a freak trampling accident occurred during a photo shoot in the Woodland Park Zoo's Elephant House. And even then, the state GOP would put Dino Rossi's name on the ballot.

This was not a surprise to anyone. Except for the state's premier political writers.

Postman stated that he'll be interested to hear specifics from Rossi about issues. Well, since he was finally e-mailed the text of kick-off speech Postman must have seen about half of it dealt with fairly specific items. I'll be interested to see if the Time's senior political writer will have the time to write about the candidate's take on education, transportation, public safety, or DSHS or whether he'll be too busy posting more about Darcy Burner's fundraising totals.

Oh Postman. Sack-it-up and post an apology. That mealy-mouthed blurb hidden in the comments section doesn't cut it. When you write your story; be sure to only rely on the sources given to you in the press release and make sure to quote Chris Vance in the seventh and fifteenth paragraphs. Can't write a story about the state GOP without quoting him. Wouldn't want to find another source. Help your writing. Get a better feel four the pulse of the party. Nah...

The hell of it is Rossi's speech was probably one of the most substantive given by a candidate during a kickoff. He addressed more than a dozen specific policy issues addressing key subjects. There was enough fodder to fill any news hole for three weeks. Out of a 15-page speech, three are on the subject of education alone.

You can think they are good or you can call them ill. Rossi's education proposals if implemented would be some of the most radical changes to the Washington education system since public schools were included as a governmental responsibility in the state constitution.

So what do you think happens during the press gathering afterwards? Any questions about education? No. DSHS? Nuh-ah. Prisons? Are you kidding me?

Instead we talked about some stupid poll. Rossi mentioned that he was polling 47-45 behind Gregoire during his speech. For an hour long talk, bringing up that 10-second sound bite was handy in showing that the race is pretty close, just like everyone knows and that both candidates have super high name recognition. Folks understand where the candidates stand.

So we had a TV reporter grilling Rossi, for 90 seconds of a 17-minute Q&A period about how his numbers were different than a Gregoire job approval poll which had her ratings slightly higher. You mean two separate polls, by two separate organizations, on two separate topics, and only questioning around 400 folks who cared to answer, came up with two completely separate end results? Slap your grandma! Get out of here.

You had questions about fundraising. The average voter doesn't care if Rossi raises $4 million, $6 million or $12 million in the race. Since reporting quarterly fundraising results is so simple that a dyslexic orangutan or a netroots blogger can do it, reporters feel they have to get hip to the game or get left in Squaresville if they don't talk about it too. For the past few years campaign coverage has focused more and more attention on fundraising totals instead of writing about issues and candidates' past performance. It is just lazy journalism and a waste of an editorial hole.

Another thing. There was question. After question. After question by one print - or wire - reporter who'll go unnamed about Dino Rossi's involvement with the Forward Washington Foundation and whether the group would release a list of its donors. *Finger twirl*. Gotta find out if Dino collected a salary. And who paid for it. Cause Dino is so strapped for cash after buying a freaking baseball team.

Don't want to talk about crime and prison population. Or throw a curveball about drug enforcement or the state's illegal alien population behind bars. Or anything about transportation. You know WSDOT has been getting some projects in on time and on budget. Don't want to hold Dino's feet to the fire for his criticism of the agency? Of course not. When someone's pretending to be a hard-hitting reporter they are too busy trying to nail another pelt on the wall so they can win that big award. Before they die of old age in ten years at any rate.

And to end the debate, here's a good guess. The donors to Forward Washington are probably not an Indian tribe or a teachers union and the individuals have probably donated to the election campaigns of politicians whom Democrats don't like. I'll lay odds. Now can we stop reading conspiracy theories in liberal blogs and get on to real issues like unregistered sex offenders?

Part of the problem is that print and radio reporters, who have a real job to do, have to compete with TV news personalities who aren't even real journalists - the producers are. It's bad enough that us dumb ink-slingers come from the lower third of college graduates. But then throw us in alongside TV reporters; some of the most vapid, clueless individuals when out in the field who don't even care about any of the subtext, nuance, or underlying themes about an event just so long as they have 30-seconds of someone, doing something, anything, that looks good on camera.

Here's the plan...

Get a shot of the candidate making a five second declarative sentence behind the podium. Switch to the candidate, arms upraised, with his family and supporters. Do a pan of the audience applauding. Follow this with your standard "press conference" shot of the candidate responding to the same bloody, damn question that the other TV reporters had asked three times before. (Prop 1) Or any random comment by the politician in question.

"Why yes I do like pork and beans Jim. But I only eat Van De Kamps. And then with brown sugar after picking out the floating fatty chunk."

Edit that comment down to about eight words. And fill the rest of the 30-second segment with the TV news personality standing in front of a news van, live, on location in Issaquah. This is a slack-jawed twit for KIRO 7 News.

Now one would expect this sort of incompetence from an ass clown like Stranger staff writer Josh Feit who was also in attendance.

Whoever Feit's dealer is needs to get him a purer blend of whatever it is he's been inhaling. The guy was rambling, incoherent and fidgeting like Tweek on South Park. First he starts with a question about Congress' S-CHIP vote on childhood insurance - he must have been confused and thought he was at a Reichert or Doc Hastings kickoff. Then he goes all Woodward and Bernstein about transportation taxes and how Rossi voted for the Nickel funding package in 2003. A... fact... that... Rossi... has... made... widely... public... by... campaigning... on... it... ever... since... 2004... Right?

Enough venting. Now that I'm done making friends and influencing people. I think I'll go back to listening to Rhinestone Cowboy...

Posted by DonWard at October 26, 2007 06:52 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Don't be so nonchalant and neutral. Get an opinion, will you?

I hope the Rs found out during McGavick that Postman is not their friend. He will buckle under pressure from the Democrats. During McGavick, the Democrats gave him Burner to go after, so he could show he was bipartisan. It just couldn't be Cantwell.

Your rant on news coverage or lack of coverage pretty well sums up what I hear and see on the TV and radio and read in the press. Don, what is the problem? Not enough time to do a story or cover something different due to deadlines caused by short staff and need to be the first? Just doing the same old stuff to keep your job and afraid to 'try' something different?

You seem to be different.

Posted by: swatter on October 26, 2007 07:31 AM
2. This mentality dribbles all the way down to the bottom 1/10th of the class, to weekly print papers. The local county GOP prepared a press release stating what vote they recommended on each of the ballot issues. The lofty scribe emailed back and said: "Can you write that up like a story? I don't have time to dig up what I-960 is about to explain to my readers."

Goes to show, write a news release that looks like a reporter written article and it will be published. BTW it was written like a reporter's story and has not yet been published. Called yesterday and asked why. She told me they didn't get it until Monday and the paper went out Wednesday and if they had room they would run it next week. Since it is a GOP story, press release dated August 12th, I am not holding my breath.

Posted by: Ken Howard on October 26, 2007 08:16 AM
3. Same issues in the blogosphere. David Goldstein is endorsing David Della, for no reason toher than that Tim Burgess once worked for a PR form that qorked for moderate right Christian groups. Is this Rovism of the Left?

http://seattlejew.blogspot.com/2007/10/is-david-della-our-version-of-bush.html

Posted by: SeattleJew on October 26, 2007 08:43 AM
4. Whew! I'm not sure there are any bridges LEFT to burn. But way to go, Don! Some things NEED to be said and it's a privilege to be able to read it when you need to blow a gasket at some who deserve to have the riot act read to them!

Posted by: Michele on October 26, 2007 08:57 AM
5. Anyone have a photo of the fetching flack referred to above?

Posted by: biggergear on October 26, 2007 09:00 AM
6. "Yesterday, though, all my buttons were pushed and folks got on the fighting side of me. Nothing gets me more upset than when people in my chosen profession make a total mockery of the institution of journalism by their inept actions."

Given the sorry state of journalism these days,you must spend a lot of time being angry.

Posted by: pbj on October 26, 2007 09:01 AM
7. "You can think they are good or you can call them ill. Rossi's education proposals if implemented would be some of the most radical changes to the Washington education system since public schools were included as a governmental responsibility in the state constitution."

Might want to tell WVH about this. Apparently he doesn't think a governor could possibly implement more institutional changes than he personally can by "caring about educating the poor children". Thus he constantly admonishes Stefan to look the other way when Democrats steal elections.

Posted by: pbj on October 26, 2007 09:10 AM
8. WVH is a she.

Posted by: Pronoun Police on October 26, 2007 09:21 AM
9. I don't think much of Don Ward's politics, but his observations about local political reporting are spot on.

On the one hand, newspapers have budgets and either can not or will not expend the money to pay reporters to do the necessary leg work. In addition, most editors are idiots and junior management suckups, and will not stand up for real news gathering.

On the other hand, any good reporter knows that you don't get good information by being a starf---er. You have to talk to grass roots people and work your way up the food chain. This is true for Republicans and for Democrats. Many times the information is just a phone call away.

Any major political reporter for any major newspaper should know this by now. Don's right. They're lazy.

Posted by: ivan on October 26, 2007 09:37 AM
10. "But talk to Rossi face to face like a man and you could see that he's been hungry for a rematch for three years."

Well, gee. That must explain why he was so silent on the issues, right?

The fact that he should have been beating Chrissy like a rented stepchild over her numerous mistakes and failures to lead... most all without a peep from Dino... yeah, THAT really showed the "fire in the belly," eh?

Posted by: Hinton on October 26, 2007 10:19 AM
11. Hinton, have you ever played a sport in your life?

Do you waste all your energy in the 1st period?
Or do you wisely give your opponent false optimism then smack em down at teh end of the LAST period when the score really counts for something.

Why would Dino preview his candidacy for the illegitimate one?

Grow up or toddle on off for your nap... the grown ups are trying to converse here.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on October 26, 2007 10:32 AM
13. Reading this drivel, I wondered who the hell Don Ward was. I looked it up and now this all makes sense: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Ward

Posted by: Tony on October 26, 2007 02:12 PM
14. Right, because governors are not supposed to have opinions about federal funding to states. Only congresspeople and bloggers can do that.

Posted by: K on October 26, 2007 02:12 PM
15. Don: could your animus for David Postman be because of his calling you on your alleged journalistic skills in his post entitled, "Are we lazy or biased?" Aug 30,2006?
http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/archives/2006/08/30/

It started:

"Sound Politics has a new writer. He's former journalist Don Ward, known at Sound Politics and Horsesass.org as reporterward.
Unfortunately he's gotten off to a rough start with a post at Sound Politics that purports to be a journalism critique but falls short of even the most basic standards of reporting."

... and went down from there.

Posted by: blathering michael on October 26, 2007 04:14 PM
16. @ #15 Nope. I made a copy-editing mistake and corrected it. The guys at HA have written worse stuff about me and I don't have animus towards them. Except for my burning contempt with Will...

@#5 The link to the Stranger article has her photo. And one of yours truly looking dead sexy - as always.

@ Ivan Thanks for the compliment...


Posted by: Don Ward on October 26, 2007 04:35 PM
17. No Don, that was no typo- it was a bit more substantive... Postman devoted a whole post to it: here's the concluding graf:

"The problems with Ward's post aren't really the factual errors. Anyone can make a mistake. But he set out to accuse the media of malfeasance or misfeasance and was not dissuaded by a lack of evidence to back up either claim. He said he wanted to write about the McGavick story because he was interested in the motives of the reporters who covered the news, who he suspected of "sniffing news ink." Maybe after seven years as a reporter Ward has yet to get the fumes out of his system."

***I didn't say it was a typo. I said it was a copy-editing mistake. There's a difference. Read a report in the Olympian about the DUI. Said McGavick was pulled over outside the Capitol (if I recall). Assumed it was Olympia. Wasn't, was in D.C. Furthermore, I wasn't "reporting" the story. I was commenting on it. Difference between the two. Either way, I corrected the mistake, issued a long apology. End of story.
Back to the main subject. ---- DW***


Posted by: blathering michael on October 26, 2007 04:49 PM
18. "Of course the reason he was mad is because Postman is your standard press release political reporter - the type I've been fighting my entire news career to overcome. You look at the majority of his coverage and its re-hashed press releases, fundraising numbers, or opinion poll results."

This statement made me laugh out loud. The type of political reporter you've been "fighting my entire career"? Enlighten us on your "career" Don. Where have you worked? What stories have you broken with your brilliant original reporting?

Did you do a Google/Lexis or any kind of cursory research to back up your claim that David Postman mostly just regurgitates press releases?

No. You just bloviate, as usual.

Where do you get your ego, Don Ward? It can only be through self-deception, because your own career does not justify it.

***Who me? I'm just your little old hicktown reporter---DW***

Posted by: jj on October 26, 2007 05:30 PM
19. if you're a commentator, commentate, and stop the braggadocio about being a journalist. You work on a shopping news, remember?

Posted by: blathering michael on October 26, 2007 06:14 PM
20. Sort of like the FEMA press conference this week, eh?
Did you catch the "reporters" at that one?

Posted by: WVH on October 27, 2007 01:59 PM
21. Yeah reporters have so much integrity these days and there is no bias whatsoever. Jayson Blair, Dan Rather, Eason Jordan (Saddam's Man at CNN), Walter Duranty... no that is not evidence at all. Just ask Mr Postman.

Posted by: pbj on October 28, 2007 12:20 AM
22. Don Ward is right - spoon fed is the phrase for most so called reporting. Lazy is the next adjective.

Postman is over rated. Real big ego, of course, has not broken a big story in months. Just what does he report but the obvious?

Don pushed buttons, this year there are more stories about fund raising than all the rest put together. Cause it is so easy, from the desk, from a PDC file.

Don, all the Stanger people are mostly drunks and sniffers. Oh well. To her credit, Erica does some real reporting, often biased, but a good read.

Posted by: earl on October 29, 2007 05:27 AM
23. Don Ward wrote: "I made a copy-editing mistake."

Oh really? How can you call it a "copy-editing mistake" when you claimed McGavick was cited for a DUI in Olympia, when he was actually arrested in Washington, D.C.? This was bad reporting, not a "copy-editing mistake." Let's look at what you actually wrote:

"You'd have thought that at least The Olympian would have caught wind of this or the Associated Press' bureau in the state capitol. The incident did happen in their neck of the woods."

Don, please explain how this is a "copy-editing mistake." Egad.

Posted by: Steve on October 30, 2007 01:26 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?