
Counterpoint, from page 396-7 of this book:
Like other newspapers of the 1790s, Freneau's National Gazette did not feign neutrality. With the population widely dispersed, newspapers were unabashedly partisan organs that supplied much of the adhesive power binding the incipient parties together. Americans were a literate people, and dozens of newspapers flourished. The country probably had more newspapers per capita than any other. A typical issue had four long sheets, crammed with essays and small advertisements but no drawings or illustrations. These papers tended to be short on facts - there was little "spot news" reporting - and long on opinion. The more closely resembled journals of opinion than daily newspapers. Often scurrilous and inaccurate, they had few qualms about hinting that a certain nameless official was embezzling money or colluding with a foreign power. "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper," Jefferson later said. "Truth itself becomes suspicious be being put into that polluted vehicle." No code of conduct circumscribed responsible press behavior. [emphasis added]Posted by Eric Earling at February 22, 2009 12:28 PM | Email This
You cannot credibly argue that people don't have a LOT more access to news and information then they did a couple hundred years ago, or even a decade ago.
When their actual access to news starts to dissipate, then I'll worry. Before then, I think I'll take it easy.
Posted by: cliff on February 22, 2009 12:38 PMWe have not had newspapers for a long time--30-40 years?
But we have news, and lots of it--good news (all senses of that word including especially "high quality") and plenty of it.
Took me a while to turn of the radio and the TV so I could se it, but it has been there for a while.
Posted by: Larry Sheldon on February 22, 2009 01:29 PMSounds like today's Pravda-Izvestia (P-I). Horsey should be proud.
Posted by: Saltherring on February 22, 2009 02:32 PMhttp://columbiancomments.blogspot.com/2009/02/major-update-feb-21-press-talk-former.html
Posted by: Hinton on February 22, 2009 02:44 PMThis outdid all the responses to my emails about the constant references to the I-695 as the excuse for 'funding problems' before the current 'budget crisis' killed the I-695 scapegoat. (I-695 never became law but was touted as just as worst as requiring abortionists to stop their trade)
Homerun by Cliff
Posted by: Col. Hogan on February 22, 2009 03:49 PM