October 05, 2009
Public Disclosure for Dummies

I've been sitting on this story for a few weeks now hoping that our "paper of record", the Seattle Times, might investigate it on their own but, as of yet, they've given it only cursory mention and it remains uncovered by all but a handful of blogs and one newspaper, the Federal Way Mirror.

So what's the story? Well, it may not seem like much to most people but it sure seemed important to Senators John McCain and Russ Feingold a few years ago and it has to do with "hard" and "soft" money and how both can be spent and by what entity.

In short, soft money comes from groups with benevolent sounding names like "Citizens for A Better Tomorrow" or "Citizens Against Violence" and are often connected to "hard" money campaigns with names like "Charles Kane for Governor" or "Committee to Re-Elect Mayor Goldie Wilson." The key to navigating the campaign finance laws is to make sure that connection isn't too close.

We all know that groups like the WEA went around singing the praises of Gregoire last year but the reason they could do it and not be in violation of campaign finance laws is that there was no coordination between Gregoire's re-election campaign and the WEA PAC.

So what's the deal with Dow Constantine's campaign?

To borrow a term from investment banking, he's "trading on both sides of the Chinese Wall." His treasurer is also the treasurer for one of those benevolent sounding soft money groups called "Citizens to Uphold the Constitution" which has paid at least $11,300 toward trying to defeat Constantine opponent Susan Hutchison.

Now Bennett might claim that all he does is enter numbers into a spreadsheet but let's get real. Even if that were the case it shows extremely poor judgment to be sharing treasurers with a campaign that Constantine isn't suppose to be connected to at all. I seem to recall a little auditing firm called Arthur Anderson claiming something similar once upon a time.

And speaking of sharing, Bennett is not the only one being shared. Constantine's campaign consultant, Northwest Passage, shares offices with Moxie Media, another campaign consultant that ran a $14,565 attack against erstwhile Constantine opponent Ross Hunter. One of Constantine's staffers also appears to be doing some work with Moxie. The Stranger contributor Josh Feit seems to have prophesied something like this might occur way back in August '07.

The PDC is still reviewing the two complaints they've thus far received and will likely launch a formal investigation next week.

So maybe this is all completely innocuous. And then again, maybe my birth certificate reads October 4, 2009.

For anyone who'd like to encourage the Seattle Times to let a more widespread audience know about what's going on, a group will be in front of their office tomorrow afternoon at 2pm.

Posted by MarkGriswold at October 05, 2009 03:30 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Constantine may have a real problem on his hands. One indicator was when he was forced to respond to the treasurer issue during his Seattle Times Ed. Board joint-interview with his opponent. Constantine was quite defensive, and tried to deflect by saying he was a little upset his "accountant" was moonlighting, and had taken some undefined steps to rectify the problem.

More than enough to this story for the Times to take a deeper look. Why they haven't done so, and shared with their readers, is a question increasingly deserving of an answer.

It's also worth taking a closer look at the blogger who broke most of this story's mounting evidence.

Posted by: pdcnerd on October 5, 2009 06:12 PM
2. Impressive. A group protesting outside the Times, even.
The citizens of King County have no time or need for more corruption in their County. So Susan Hutchison is the clear choice for voters who want real change and realistic, practical leadership for the trying times we are in-----instead of just another shovelful of la-de-da cater-to-special-interests-screw-the-taxpayers-business-as-usual that her opponent would bring.

Posted by: Michele on October 5, 2009 08:24 PM
3. I think the treasurer issue you guys are chasing after is BS...it is a technicality at best and doesn't involve strategic collusion, etc.

The REAL problem is the consultant doing the IE's for the unions and other liberal groups is sharing an office with Dow's general consultant, where, conveniently, Dow also houses his campaign. Anyone smell collusion?

Posted by: Not the real problem on October 6, 2009 11:57 AM
4. The treasurer issue with Dow's campaign is minor...and on a technicality I believe totally legal. Clerical work by nature does not imply strategic collusion.

So--why are we focusing on this issue when there is bigger issue staring us in the face? The consultant (Moxie Media) who is did the ie's for labor unions and other democrat-aligned groups in the primary (and has those contracts again for the general) shares an office with Dow's consultant AND Dow's campaign......ummm? What?

Posted by: The real issue on October 6, 2009 12:03 PM
5. So the PDC has dismissed the complaint against Constantine regarding Sinderman/Collins, but will look at the treasurer thing?

Too bad, because Sinderman/Collins did a real hatchet job against Eastsider Ross Hunter. I'm sure Ross is still steaming about it. Doesn't help that he now has to play nice, with "go along get along," by endorsing Dow.

Posted by: seasaw on October 6, 2009 05:40 PM
6. Funny how you left out the MASSIVE support for Rossi by the BIAW - it was the talk of the state last year, so I'm assuming selective memory here.

Funny how that happens.

Posted by: Michael on October 7, 2009 04:42 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?