November 11, 2009
Olympia Democrats facing huge pressure to raise taxes

The front-page, above-the-fold news story in today's Seattle Times makes it clear that Olympia's Democrats -- Gregoire and the Dems who control the state house and state senate -- are facing huge pressure to raise taxes. It also illustrates the need for everyone to keep fighting on behalf of taxpayers.

STATE DEMOCRATS FACING REVOLT BY LABOR

By Andrew Garber, Seattle Times, Wednesday, November 11, 2009

State Democratic lawmakers have a revolt on their hands among major labor groups that provide the party crucial support during elections. The Washington State Labor Council, the Service Employees International Union and unions representing teachers and state workers have either stopped or sharply reduced donations to Democratic caucus political-action committees that back candidates for the state House and Senate. "I think the labor movement is more serious about withholding support from Democratic candidates this year than I have seen in my 30 years in politics," said Dwight Pelz, chairman of the state Democratic Party. There's even talk of trying to defeat some Democratic incumbents if they don't support issues important to labor in the next legislative session -- such as raising taxes to help close a growing budget shortfall.

...

All of this puts Democrats in a tough spot. Raising taxes in an election year is politically risky. But so is alienating the party's base. Democrats currently control the House, the Senate and the governor's office. Labor groups typically donate several hundred thousand dollars a year to the Democratic caucus PACs, controlled by House and Senate leaders, and provide volunteers to staff phone banks and campaign door to door. But this year, labor donations are a fraction of years past.

...

Labor groups are unhappy with lawmakers for not raising taxes to help close the $9 billion budget shortfall earlier this year.

...

The next legislative session will be key, they said, to labor support in the 2010 election. A big issue will be how the Democrats close a shortfall approaching $2 billion in the current state budget. Democratic lawmakers who don't support a tax increase and fall short on other labor issues could find themselves without union support. Or even become a target.

...

In the upcoming legislative session "there are people who will have to get off a fence this year and grow some courage," said David Rolf, president of Service Employees International Union Local 775.

-- END --

There's nothing courageous about taking more of the people's money. We already face extraordinarily tough economic times and raising taxes will only make things worse.

On election night, we said: "The tug-of-war over taxes continues with or without I-1033." Today's Seattle Times story shows that the other side is pulling the rope HARD in favor of higher taxes. Taxpayers need help pulling the rope against higher taxes.

Posted by Tim Eyman at November 11, 2009 03:13 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Then Democrats need to show them the door. Get together, change the state to 'Right to Work' and tell the Unions to put some ice on it.

Competition works where ever its tried, and if the Unions had to compete for its members and give them a choice as to whether or not they had to join or pay a 'representation fee', then the unions would be a whole lot less powerful.

Democrats, I realize it's a relationship with the unions, but it doesn't have to be a suicide pact either.

Posted by: RinaseaofDs on November 11, 2009 03:56 PM
2. Then Democrats need to show them the door. Get together, change the state to 'Right to Work' and tell the Unions to put some ice on it.

Competition works where ever its tried, and if the Unions had to compete for its members and give them a choice as to whether or not they had to join or pay a 'representation fee', then the unions would be a whole lot less powerful.

Democrats, I realize it's a relationship with the unions, but it doesn't have to be a suicide pact either.

Posted by: RinaseaofDs on November 11, 2009 04:04 PM
3. So let's see---times are tough; and raising taxes on people who don't have jobs to make people who do happy is supposed to impress us? Democrats, are you completely crazy? You really think that's going to impress the whole rest of the state that isn't pouring money into your political coffers??

I'm sure my next-door neighbor who's been out of work for a year will not be impressed with your tax hikes...

Posted by: Michele on November 11, 2009 04:59 PM
4. Tim,

I'm a sympathizer with the intent of most of your initiatives, and a firm believer in limited government.

That said, I wonder if it might behoove you for your next initiative to take a new approach. That is, take the best bill idea proposed by a legislator during session that did not become law and use that as your initiative. There's plenty of good, solid bill ideas dropped by intelligent Republicans in Olympia that don't go anywhere. Heck, several of them even get good editorials written about them by the mainstream press.

Why not use one of their ideas? You'd have the advantage of knowing it was constitutionally drafted, knowing what the press thinks about the bill, and have built in allies. And, frankly, it could be used as a vehicle to increase the Republicans down in Olympia, as you and they could spend the whole run up to the election going, "Geez, this is such a good commonsense idea, but why didn't it go anywhere in Olympia?"

There's easily a handful of bills being held up by Democrat majorities that if the public had a chance to vote they'd pass with over 60%. One example was the Rainy Day Fund idea, which Gov. Gregoire borrowed from Republicans for her re-election bid. But there are plenty of other ideas still out there. Pick your topic . . . property taxes, health care, education, transportation, government reform.

Just a thought,

Donovan

Posted by: Donovan on November 11, 2009 06:42 PM
5. What a great spin piece by the Times...do we really think any entitlement thinking union person is going to pull the lever for anyone that would impose freedom? Do we sing the blues that they are withholding? The second the polling comes in that there is a 'Blue Massacre' coming they will be beating us up to get their way.
Shove taxes down our throats and we'll personally show all them the door.
At a recent city council meeting the liberal finance director cried and whined for a large property tax increase...the Dems on the council said no way to raising the taxes...in fact they cut the total take 1%...at least it in the right direction. Only 72 years until my taxes are cut in half at this rate.

Posted by: Col. Hogan on November 11, 2009 09:41 PM
6. I am a union member. It is not so much unions, as public-employee unions, that want higher taxes. Trust me, the typical private-sector union member does not favor higher taxes.

Posted by: travis t on November 12, 2009 04:48 AM
7. If our state GOP had their head anywhere but firmly in the sand, they would get ahead of this issue and plant the idea firmly with the voting public that tax increases are in the cards if Dems continue to hold a veto proof majority in congress.

Instead, they'll take their campaign funds and go out and spend more money on yard signs.

Posted by: johnny on November 12, 2009 07:06 AM
8. I wish our Republican party in WA. state was more on the ball!!Take a clue from the successful r governors back East in Virginia and New Jersey!

Posted by: Laurie on November 12, 2009 08:05 AM
9. My favorite response to armchair quarterbacking / organizational complaints of any kind boils down to, "What I'm hearing you say is that YOU want to drive this change... right?"

Therefore, if you really have motivation to improve the state of the state GOP, then I suggest you start by getting involved with your local precinct.

Change starts with us.

Posted by: Jack Turk on November 12, 2009 08:15 AM
10. LOL. In a state where the likes of Jim McDermott is perpetually re-elected by landslide proportions, it might make more sense to work on improving the state of the Democrap party.

Posted by: Another Jack on November 12, 2009 09:16 AM
11. @9 It's a good point and I haven't been sitting on my hands. I was a volunteer for a few years with the state GOP, but quit when I realized that the GOP in this state was hopelessly out of touch.

For the last few years, I've donated my money to Tim Eyeman instead of the state GOP and will continue to do so until they learn this is a battle of ideas instead of yard signs.

Tim may lose campaigns a lot of the time, but at least he elevates issues and calls dems to the carpet. Even when he loses, he's more effective than the WA GOP and what's amazing about that is how far the state GOP tries to distance themselves from him.

I don't expect the GOP to change during the limited time I'll still be here, and figure that state economy is going to be dominated for the next several years by deeply disheartened former Boeing workers wondering where their jobs went anyway. I'm moving to someplace where they still build freeways and create jobs.

(The company I work for is moving me and close to 100 other highly paid workers to Texas because they are sick of the "punish the producers" attitude in this state.)

Posted by: johnny on November 12, 2009 10:09 AM
12. "Will the last person leaving Seattle, please turn out the lights"

Posted by: Liberty on November 12, 2009 10:53 AM
13. Travis T @ #6 gets it right. Replace the word "labor" with the words "government employees" and the article makes sense.

Posted by: Micajah on November 12, 2009 11:11 AM
14. I have yet to see good names for people running as an R for the next cycle.

Jack Turk, are you giving it another go?

Posted by: swatter on November 12, 2009 11:53 AM
15. Hi Swatter, at the tea party rally in Puyallup there were 2 Conservates Craig Williams in Vacouver Wa, and Sean Salazar on Montlake Te4rrace both running for Patty Murrays Senate seat.Check thier websites and see what you think?(Vote Wi8lliams2010.com and seanforsenate.com Good point #11 about Tim Eyman.Sorry though about our states unfavorable bussiness climate.

Posted by: Laurie on November 12, 2009 03:10 PM
16. Jack I do more than armchair Qb!I have a ? for you were you at the tea party rally in Puyallup? I was and you may have been there too for all Iknow . I have emailed from time to time a congressman and local politicians when I can. I also listen to fox news when I can to keepm updated. And support local events like this when gas alows.So take a deep breath ok?

Posted by: Laurie on November 12, 2009 03:28 PM
17. Hi, my name is fRed. I am a public sector union member. It's not my fault. *

But, believe me, not one of the "organized" part of public sector unions will ever mark their "mail in acorn ballots" with an R mark. When it is crunch time, the only spelling they know will start with D.

*Please, send help!

Posted by: fRed on November 12, 2009 05:03 PM
18. The D's won big in the King County Exec race and I-1033 lost big. The left sees this a license to jack taxes and spending to the moon.

And why shouldn't they?

The voters of this State keep voting for these people. We get the government that we deserve.

Posted by: Kato on November 12, 2009 10:50 PM
19. Ever Notice Kato the guilty party of this nonsence is always in Seattle or parts of King county!! Thats too bad because members of my famliy live there and think more like us.Lets hope enough citizens in this area wake up and we can finally Take out these socailists!

Posted by: Laurie on November 13, 2009 06:56 AM
20. The conspiracy theorist in me says that even if candidates other than Dems were to recieve the majority of votes, even by a wide margin, they cannot win because the D's count the ballots and elections go the way they want them to, especially in Seattle. Maybe if someone were to qualify a referendum to tighten up the votes so that we can be more secure in the knowledge that the majority truly does rule in an election then things might change.

"Even though I'm paranoid it doen't mean they are not out to get me".

Posted by: REBEL on November 13, 2009 07:20 AM
21. Timmy,

You want to do a real initiative to follow 1033 that I'd even support? Instead of limit tax increases to 1%.....tie it with salary, pay, and benefit increase limited to 1% with focusing on unions. Those guys FAR exceed 1%....even 3% probably because of binding arbitration. They're the last to get cut before other popular services like libraries, roads, etc.

It's a harder road to travel, but if you pull it off you even might get some elected officials on board.

Posted by: Matty on November 13, 2009 06:31 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?