February 03, 2010
GALLING: Democrats don't just get rid of the 2/3's, they gut I-960's "sunshine" transparency policies - ASK EYMAN ABOUT IT

February 3, 2010

To: Our thousands of supporters throughout the state (cc'd to all media outlets -- reporters, columnists, editorial writers, and others in newspapers, radio, and TV -- House & Senate members, and the Governor)

From: Our Expanded Team of co-sponsors for I-1053, the "Save The 2/3's Vote For Tax Increases Initiative": Tim Eyman, Jack Fagan, Mike Fagan, Mike Dunmire, Senator Don Benton, Senator Janea Holmquist, Erma Turner, Nancy Nelson, Dagny Lord, Keli Carender, Senator Pam Roach, Rep. Matt Shea, John Ahern & Ken Morse, ph: 425-493-9127, email: tim_eyman@comcast.net, http://www.VotersWantMoreChoices.com (go to our website to do a secure donation by VISA/Mastercard/PayPal)

RE: GALLING: Democrats don't just get rid of the 2/3's, they gut I-960's "sunshine" transparency policies

Galling: irritating, exasperating, or bitterly humiliating.

It is galling for Democrats to not just get rid of I-960's 2/3's vote requirement for tax increases, but also its "sunshine" transparency policies. The 2/3's legislative vote requirement for state government to increase taxes has been approved by voters 3 times (1993, 1998, 2007) and it's withstood 2 court challenges (most recently, a unanimous state supreme court rejected Lisa Brown's lawsuit). As the Seattle Times editorial stated: The situation in Olympia now is what the people had in mind when they passed it. Legislators are playing with dynamite if they repeal it.

But they've arrogantly gone further, gutting I-960's "sunshine" transparency provisions. No more 10-year cost projections on bills increasing taxes and fees, exempting revenue-raising bills from being sent to the media or interested citizens, and an end to telling the public how legislators voted.

The abuse of the emergency clause will no longer be deterred. Under I-960, if the Legislature jacks up taxes and then slaps an emergency clause on the bill removing the people's right to do a referendum, then the people are at least given an opportunity to express their opinion on it in the November election with an advisory vote. And 2 pages are set aside in the general election voters pamphlet in November telling the public how legislators voted on the 'emergency' tax increase. Their 'end 960' bill makes it clear they have no interest in hearing the voters' opinions and are dead-set-against letting the voters know how legislators voted. Galling, exasperating.

Chris Gregoire, Lisa Brown, and other Democrats did their best BACK IN 2007 to convince voters to reject I-960. Voters approved it anyway. That's 3 times the voters have approved the 2/3's. It shouldn't take a 4th vote to get them to listen.

All this does is throw gasoline on the fire of enthusiasm for this year's Initiative 1053. Our petitions are being printed and will be mailed on Friday to our thousands of supporters throughout the state.

I-1053 is the most effective counter-offensive to Gregoire's arrogant tax-raising agenda. Help make it happen. FULL STEAM AHEAD!

Regards, Our Expanded Team of co-sponsors for this year's initiative: Tim Eyman, Jack Fagan, Mike Fagan, Mike Dunmire, Senator Don Benton, Senator Janea Holmquist, Erma Turner, Nancy Nelson, Dagny Lord, Keli Carender, Senator Pam Roach, Rep. Matt Shea, John Ahern & Ken Morse, ph: 425-493-9127, email: tim_eyman@comcast.net, http://www.VotersWantMoreChoices.com (go to our website to do a secure donation by VISA/Mastercard/PayPal)

Posted by Tim Eyman at February 03, 2010 07:36 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I am sure the useful idiots will have all sorts of reasons why this is a good thing and we should be happy about this.

If this state cannot muster enough anti-incumbant votes this November to boot out the majority of these fools we will become a leftist wonderland hybrid of CA and OR.

Posted by: ducttape2 on February 3, 2010 10:26 PM
2. Here's what I want to ask EYMAN (his name has to appear in CAPITAL LETTERS, right?) about it: If 2/3 is such a great idea, how about we require a 2/3 vote to pass initiatives?

Posted by: Bruce on February 4, 2010 01:17 AM
3. Bruce,

Maybe if an initiate was for a tax increase we could have the 2/3 vote rule.

Posted by: Eyago on February 4, 2010 06:46 AM
4. Bruce,

Better yet, why don't you circulate a petition that requires all petitions to need a 2/3 vote to pass instead of wasting time making snarky comments?

Posted by: eyago on February 4, 2010 06:49 AM
5. Bruce, have you ever noticed not one dem campaign admits "yes we want to raise taxes to support our pac friends" ? Yet when they get in office, all it takes is 50% plus one vote to rob your pocket to pay questionable folk from the trough. That 2/3 is a much tougher skirt to hide behind for the trolls that behave such a way.
There's a simple example of it and it has to be done this way so you'd understand it.
In a room with 11 males and 9 females a vote is taken and it's now legal to forcibly remove the womens clothes.
Simple majority, the taking of somebody elses belongings.

Posted by: PC on February 4, 2010 07:41 AM
6. And remember, whatever you do, send Tim your money.

Did you hear Tim? SEND TIM YOUR MONEY!!!

Tim needs your money so that he can keep taking your money.

Posted by: ivan on February 4, 2010 08:22 AM
7. ivan, this isnt about sending Tim Your money, this is about a government who feels its requirement in life is to dictate how you will live, where you will live, what the Govt will give you to live on, and how much it wants to take away. I thought you folks were interested in living freely, and yet, when a blatant theft of your money and my money occur, all you can seem to do is call names. Dont you want to live freely? Dont you believe that Ben Franklin was right when he said "Mine is better than ours?" Dont you believe in the Constitution and LIMITED government? Once again, this isnt about sending Tim your money, it is about living the way the FOUNDERS of this nation envisioned it...

Posted by: Al on February 4, 2010 08:48 AM
8.
And remember, whatever you do, send Christine your money.

Did you hear Christine? SEND CHRISTINE YOUR MONEY!!!

Christine needs your money so that she can keep taking your money.

There, fixed it for you Ivan.

Posted by: SouthernRoots on February 4, 2010 10:01 AM
9. Hey Peanut Gallery,

Why do each and every one of Timmy's posts here end with

"go to our website to do a secure donation by VISA/Mastercard/PayPal"?

Anybody else posting like that?

Posted by: MikeBoyScout on February 4, 2010 04:25 PM
10. I'd damn sure be happier send TIM my money than GREGOIRE and the union boy croney mafia scum!!!

Posted by: pbj on February 4, 2010 08:35 PM
11. There needs to be limits on how much of an agency budget can be spent on upper management salaries. That's where the real rip off is.

But they won't be touched in the furloughs.

The Governor won't be touched in furloughs.
The legislators don't see any loss in pay.
No elected officials see any cuts.

The leadership and or statesman thing to do would be for the Governor to ask the legislature for a top to bottom across the board cut in pay, and then everybody shut up about it and go on working.

Posted by: JoeBandMember on February 4, 2010 09:47 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?