February 21, 2010
Legislature killed public disclosure on tax increases. Gregoire?

Our legislature was busy the past two weeks overriding our votes on I-960 and previously to require a 2/3 majority to increase taxes. Tim Eyman covered this.

Which representatives and senators voted to increase the sales tax and claimed it was temporary?

I-960 also had provisions to provide transparency on tax increases - the details of each tax increase and the names of who votes for or against them. It added RCW 29A.32.070

"Two pages shall be provided in the general election voters' pamphlet for each measure for an advisory vote of the people under RCW 43.135.041 and shall consist of the serial number assigned by the secretary of state under RCW 29A.72.040, the short description formulated by the attorney general under RCW 29A.72.283, the tax increase's most up-to-date ten-year cost projection, including a year-by-year breakdown, by the office of financial management under RCW 43.135.031, and the names of the legislators, and their contact information, and how they voted on the increase upon final passage so they can provide information to, and answer questions from, the public. For the purposes of this subsection, 'names of legislators, and their contact information' includes each legislator's position (senator or representative), first name, last name, party affiliation (for example, Democrat or Republican), city or town they live in, office phone number, and office e-mail address.
SB 6130 killed this transparency requirement; it didn't repeal that section, but provides an end run around it for two years.

I am shocked that our legislature would want to hide when passing tax increases. They are going around right now saying it is their solemn duty to raise taxes. Aren't they proud of their responsible actions? Why hide disclosure of what they did?

Christine Gregoire can stop the legislature in its tracks by using her line-item veto to remove the provisions that end-run the transparency provision of RCW 29A.32.070. Surely she is in favor of our legislators being responsible for their actions.

Source: WA Policy Institute on 2/10/10 and 2/17/10.

Posted by Ron Hebron at February 21, 2010 07:55 PM | Email This
Comments
1. We pay record taxes and it's not enough to fund this welfare state the left has built. Unemployment and inflation are on the rise and new taxes are all you can come up with? Bring it on Demorats. You apparently have no clue the wrath you're inviting in November.

What's it feel like to be deer in the headlights?

Posted by: Reality on February 21, 2010 08:44 PM
2. the wrath might not be electoral...afterall,the dims can always import a few more Indians from South Dakota to secure the vote in downtown Seattle....that or gather up the bums from the rail yard and give them the same address....

no...the wrath will be less taxes coming in...more people foreclosing because private industry is being chased away....liqour from states, as well as candy,soda,water...

Chrissy can't expect the state workers to carry all the taxes though, so eventually, she'll have to cut, cut, cut....

Posted by: lee on February 21, 2010 10:20 PM
3. Don't forgot CCCP Gregoire led the shakedown of Tobacco as AG looking for a big longterm income stream. Many lib states took a small lump sum which was promptly blown since they apparently have never ran so much as a bead shop and don't understand bugeting.

And, oh yeah, she and her unyuns are chasing off Boeing.

When backed into an corder she'll whine about those talk show radios.

Posted by: Matt M on February 22, 2010 05:28 AM
4. Don't forgot CCCP Gregoire led the shakedown of Tobacco as AG looking for a big longterm income stream. Many lib states took a small lump sum which was promptly blown since they apparently have never ran so much as a bead shop and don't understand bugeting.

And, oh yeah, she and her unyuns are chasing off Boeing.

When backed into a corner she'll whine about those talk show radios.

Posted by: Matt M on February 22, 2010 05:29 AM
5. I've been shopping for houses in Las Vegas. Seriously. I will not be surprised if I'm posting from Nevada in the next year or two.

Posted by: blindman on February 23, 2010 08:22 AM
6. GGEuNA Thank you for the article. I hope you do not mind if I posted it in his blog, of course, with reference to your site?

Posted by: Tommy35 on February 27, 2010 06:26 AM
7. GGEuNA Thank you for the article. I hope you do not mind if I posted it in his blog, of course, with reference to your site?

Posted by: Tommy35 on February 27, 2010 06:26 AM
8. et6qky Thank you for the article. I hope you do not mind if I posted it in his blog, of course, with reference to your site?

Posted by: Tommy35 on February 27, 2010 06:26 AM
9. x14uXp Thank you for the article. I hope you do not mind if I posted it in his blog, of course, with reference to your site?

Posted by: Tommy35 on February 27, 2010 06:26 AM
10. GGEuNA Thank you for the article. I hope you do not mind if I posted it in his blog, of course, with reference to your site?

Posted by: Tommy35 on February 27, 2010 06:26 AM
11. et6qky Thank you for the article. I hope you do not mind if I posted it in his blog, of course, with reference to your site?

Posted by: Tommy35 on February 27, 2010 06:27 AM
12. x14uXp Thank you for the article. I hope you do not mind if I posted it in his blog, of course, with reference to your site?

Posted by: Tommy35 on February 27, 2010 06:27 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?