No, not Brian Baird, Bryan Baird.
At the state GOP convention last Friday, people were abuzz with news that the incumbent Democrat might have reneged on his promise to not seek another term, and had filed as an independent. Alas, it had not happened: instead, a 24-year-old kid filed, even though he would not turn the constitutionally mandated age of 25 until next March (which means, of course, that he'd likely have been eligible to run if not for the Twentieth Amendment ... yet again, the Constitution disenfranchises a minority).
Baird filed, and then the Secretary of State's office returned his fee, having been told they couldn't legally accept his filing.
It makes me wonder why there isn't an automated system for catching that sort of thing. The candidates file by computer, and all the State has to do is check the birthdate, and automatically reject a filing by someone who doesn't meet the age requirement. It's not hard.
But then again, Secretary Sam Reed's office still refuses to do this basic, simple, obvious, automatic check for voter registrations, too, which is why we've had underage children voting in recent years.
Cross-posted on <pudge/*>.
Posted by pudge at June 14, 2010 10:35 PM | Email ThisHmmmm, operative term above...methinks there's more to come on this. :)
Posted by: Duffman on June 15, 2010 07:15 AMNo such requirement exists. You only have to be the correct age before taking office.