September 02, 2006
Does New Format for King County Voter's Pamphlet Give Democrats Unfair Advantage?

In looking over my newly arrived King County Voter's Pamphlet, I observe a different format than previous years---a format which has the appearance of being a built-in advantage for democrat candidates for public office.

It used to be that candidates for each partisan race, whether it be federal or local, would be grouped together. i.e., for U.S. Senate you would see all the democrat candidates followed by the republican candidates in the same section. Then for the next race--e.g., state legislature, you'd again see each party's candidates listed in the same section for that race, etc.

This year's pamphlet is vastly different: A "blue section" lists each race from federal on down to local--but ONLY the democrat candidates for all those offices are listed in each contest category . You have to flip all the way over to PAGE 21 before seeing any republican candidates whatsoever.

The people that put this pamphlet together HAVE to know that many people may not make it all the way through it and stop reading after the first few pages. So that would mean that they would only have read about the democrat candidates for all the offices, and in some instances people may believe that ONLY the democrat candidates are running for each office (I know, I know, you and I wouldn't make that mistake, but remember how many people marked their ballots in amazingly unintelligible ways in '04 and '05?? And the extreme difficulty the canvassing board had in trying to discern what the heck the voter meant?? These same voters have received this voter pamphlet!)

Some will argue--"well, this is just a differently organized way to present all the different contests involved for the primary". I say, bull--they used to group all parties represented in each race under the same section even for the primaries, so that voters could see ALL the candidates in the race instead of making it look to a casual observer that only democrats are running for these offices unless you look much further into the pamphlet.

I'm highly suspicious about this new format and call on King County Elections to go back to the old way of formatting the pamphlet, so as not to give democrats an unfair advantage. KCE is run by democrats, and they should go out of their way to ensure that it does not look like they are trying to give themselves an advantage by the way they have laid out the voter's pamphlet.

Of all the complaints I heard from voters about the '04 election debacle, not once did I hear them say that the KC voter's pamphlet was part of the problem, and in need of revamping in this way!

Posted by MicheleDeRouis at September 02, 2006 12:49 AM | Email This
Comments
1. SnoCo guide is laid out the same way.

Posted by: SouthernRoots on September 2, 2006 07:03 AM
2. Thurston County is laid out the same way too. I also noticed that in the Thurston CO guide only the state races have bio's for the canidates. None of the Federal races do (i.e. US Senate and US Congress Races). Yet some of the D's that are running at the state/local level out here have a bio yet have no primary (i.e. State Legeslative district 20 seat 1). They even have blank spaces that say "no canidate filled" on both the D's and R's pages. That space could have been used to for Bio's on McGavick for the R's and Cantwell for the D's and so on down the line for these primary races.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on September 2, 2006 07:53 AM
3. So I take it everyone else has this new 3 ballot system (Republican ballot, Democrat ballot and non-partisan ballot)?

Posted by: TrueSoldier on September 2, 2006 09:55 AM
4. Forget the "democrats first" layout, which is obviously designed to trick the simple-minded into voting for libs. The real subliminal message is in the cover.

The first thing you see when you look at the cover is a dark field in the middle (with apologies to the disabled artist, it takes a moment to make out the image of an eagle on crutches). The words printed in the middle of this dark field are "our vote democracy," which doesn't make sense. So your brain attempts to make a logical phrase out of it. Here's how it accomplishes this:

The word "our" is off center--it is ignored. The last three letters of "democracy" are purposefully set in a smaller font and lighter weight--they get absorbed by the black field. The end result: Your brain truncates the words in the body of the eagle into "vote democratic."

Then there is the image itself--an eagle on crutches. The American Eagle is most commonly associated with the presidential seal and the U.S. military. The artist is suggesting that the current adminstration is disabled, or has disabled the country. A secondary intent of the image would be to point out that the military is maiming soldiers.

I don't know whether to be amused or concerned about this. I'm beginning to think that democracy itself--not just the GOP--is under attack in this country. And King County is leading the way.

It will be interesting to find out who the Dean Logan replacement is. I wouldn't be surprised if he/she is behind this pamphlet.

Posted by: Organization Man on September 2, 2006 11:08 AM
5. I think we should all return them to the sender, postage unpaid! And better yet, tape a brick to them before you send them back, as I heard they do in England with campaign posters and junk mail they get that they do not want.

Posted by: GS on September 3, 2006 09:43 PM
6. Same here in Piece Co. as well. And we've got a cover with what looks like a Bennaton clothes As with a bunch of 20 something models of all colors, creeds, sexes, etc. that's supposed to evoke some kind of feel-good, diversity BS. It's just another Rock The Vote style young voter ploy by whichever Democrat bureaucrat put this junk together.

Posted by: Jeff B. on September 3, 2006 09:51 PM
7. RCW 29A.32.070 states that, "Federal and state offices must appear in the pamphlet in the same sequence as they appear on the ballot."

Posted by: R in Burien on September 4, 2006 09:25 AM
8. R in Burien--thanks for the link. Looks like we have RINO Sam to thank for approving the layout and the ballot. The Washington state political body is systemically diseased, from the poll worker to the SOS. How did it happen?

Posted by: Organization Man on September 4, 2006 10:12 AM
9. Since when does being in violation of the law stop King County from doing what they want? They have Sam Reed to run interference for them. He won't do a damn thing to change the corrupt system, because he's a corrupt as they are.

If we want relief from this sewer of corruption, we have to show up and vote it out in numbers so overwhelming that these a**holes won't be able to call the election "too close to count."

Take it to the streets, people. Out-fox the foxes. Until we do, we will continue to get reamed.

Posted by: ERNurse on September 4, 2006 12:37 PM
10. I know there is supposedly some rule that is followed for determing which party goes first on the ballot. Does anyone know or remember what that rule is? I believe it has to do with which party wins a particular election, but don't remember which one it is.

Posted by: Michele on September 4, 2006 02:44 PM
11. Michelle,
I think the reason Democrats get to be first might be found in RCW 29A.36.161. Subsection 3 states the order for the general election ballot is based upon which party's candidate for president won the last presidential race in the state. I realize that is for the general, not the primary, but I cannot find precisely where in the RCW's the order for primary ballots is mentioned. However, my guess is that they might just do it the same way for the primary as the general.

Posted by: R in Burien on September 4, 2006 04:50 PM
12. Michelle, I noticed the same thing last week when my pamphlet arrived. Good on you for picking this up and making a story out of it!!!

Posted by: Patrick in Capitol Hill on September 6, 2006 07:48 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?