July 16, 2008
Taking a look at gas prices.

I have enjoyed making snarky comments about the gas prices and the complete failure of the democrat leadership to do anything about it.  Bad enough that prices have doubled since the democrats were elected, but now that they are historically high, they are paralyzed by the necessity to pander to their environmental base.

And make no mistake, that's what this is all about.  The democrats know the environmental lobby has a huge voice and they don't want to be seen as caving in to the pressures of the evil oil barons.

Some friends of mine and I have been having a spirited debate about this, and we all tend to agree that dependency on foreign oil is a problem.  But, I wonder how many people realize that the biggest importer of oil and petroleum to the US is not a bunch of greedy Arabs, it is Canada.  Not only that, but 40% of our oil imports come from non OPEC countries.  Canada and Mexico alone sell us about one third of our imports. 

 

Or that while we import 10 million barrels a day or so, we produce more then 5 Million domestically.

Heck if we could double our production, we would lower our dependency by about 50%.

So this is not about OPEC, and not about the middle east (since quite a few countries in OPEC are not in Asia), it is about speculators and supply and demand.  Economics.  It is a matter of increasing supply.

So why then wouldn't you want to explore a chance to add to our choices of supply?  Aside from pressure from eco nazis, one reason we stopped US based drilling was because it was so cheap to import it.

Well it isn't anymore, is it?  So why not open up some of the abandoned fields and look for more?

President Bush today opened the door to more off shore drilling, and congress should grow a pair of nads and tell the eco nazis to take a back seat to reality and get cracking.  Sure, we can continue to develop alternatives.  But in the mean time we need immediate solutions.

Critics nay say drilling, claiming we would have to wait ten years to see the benefit.  Maybe so.

But affordable non petroleum alternatives are not going to happen over night either.

So why not let both sides benefit?  Aren't more ideas and optsoin better then less?

And one other thing.  I found this nifty chart showing the relationship between US oil prices and crude oil prices. (click for the full size)

 

Funny.  If i am reading this right, oil prices are climbing much faster then gas prices.

I guess the evil oil barons forgot to gouge a few dollars here and there.

The point?  It could be worse.

And the other point?  It could get better if Congress would cowboy up and DO SOMETHING.

Thank God we elected the "New Direction Democrats".

Posted by guitarplayr at July 16, 2008 01:25 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Progressives hate America. The goal is to cripple the US with respect to other nations, and strong arm as many people as possible out of their cars.

This will be issue #1 for November. And it's not going to be pretty for Progressives. Union Democrats usually vote Democrat, but many of them love their trucks and gas powered toys. The same Union Dems work in trades that require long daily commutes and lots of fuel. John McCain is liberal enough for those guys.

Posted by: Jeff B. on July 16, 2008 09:54 AM
2. This is the same reason that the Puget Sound, a community of 1.8 million people, has some of the worst traffic in the nation -- it's by design! It's inherent in Liberal thinking that any kind of independence or freedom is bad...such as the private automobile. Therefore, they build traffic systems designed to force people into concentrated bureaucratic systems like light rail. Ameriphobes such as the Olympia planners have all been brainwashed to think a certain way about driving, the suburbs, global warming, the car and so on...and they behave in the same zombized way as Islamic terrorists...they have no room for counter arguments.

Posted by: John Bailo on July 16, 2008 10:53 AM
3. Excellent subject guitarplayr and well presented.

Yes Jeff, Progressives hate America. Every country on earth wants their populace to have access to the cheapest energy obtainable so that their economies will grow and their citizens will live comfortably. Every country but the United States under the control of the Democrat party and their sycophants, the eco-fascists with their legions of fire bombing goons.

John, I have mentioned this a number of times here at SP, "they" (The eco-fascists and their supporters in the government) want us out of our cars and living in high-rise cement blocks, clustered around retail cores of their choosing. If that sounds like 1984 well, I'm afraid that Mr. Owell had it right. And if you think I'm delusional, just a few weeks ago a big study was released and it recommended that very thing for the future if the Puget Sound basin. Eliminating suburbs for "clustered living". Saving the planet you see . . .

I really don't see how we can get the Democrats to let drilling occur. For some reason the very people who are howling the loudest (a majority of the population) seem to be the ones that keep voting these people in. I'm not sure they know what they are doing. At one time I mentioned to my brother: "I don't vote for any politician who raises my taxes." He looked at me thunderstruck because he had been voting those very people in who were doing it to him and his business. Are people generally that stupid?

I guess we'll see in the next few months.

Posted by: G Jiggy on July 22, 2008 09:09 PM
4. I wanted to expand on Jeff's point about unions. As of Monday, Ford announced that it is laying off thousands more and shuttering 14 plants. GM is doing same and Chrysler isn't in much better shape. All of those jobs are being lost to four dollar(+) a gallon gas as anything bigger than a 45 mpg econobox languishes in dealer lots. Will the thousands of U.A.W. workers (solidly Democrat voters we are told) be voting for the very politicians that are putting them out of work by refusing to allow drilling for our own resources? There is a very real threat that at least one of the three will go belly-up if not two of them. Were will those jobs go? What will Democrats say then?

I pristine planet looks pretty bleak when you can't feed you family.

Posted by: G Jiggy on July 22, 2008 09:22 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?