We've seen the rank bigotry of the fringe leftists infesting us. They're so predictable and easy to manipulate. But then, they'd have to be, or they wouldn't BE leftists to begin with.
That said, their ongoing effort to deny us the right to decide this question, a typical issue when it comes to a will of the people they might not like, took it in the nards today when a King County Judge ruled that their bogus, nonsensical efforts to silence the people on their garbage position was as worthless as the rest of their bigotry.
Spector said in her ruling that "the court recognizes the concerns raised by the plaintiffs regarding the validity of a significant number of petitions and signatures in this case."But she also said the law does not require the secretary of state to refuse to accept petitions that do not meet state law and that it is unclear whether there are limits to the secretary of state's discretion to accept petitions.
Furthermore, Spector said, the King County Superior Court has no authority to prevent the secretary of state from accepting the petitions with questionable signatures, and that those challenging the signatures can only do so after the referendum has been certified.
Any challenge to R-71 would have to be brought before the Thurston County Superior Court within five days after the referendum is certified, she said.
It akes a special kind of hatred and bigotry to deny the people the right to determine this, or any issue granted us by the Constitution of this state, the kind amply illustrated by the leftist bigots commenting on my last post.
Posted by Hinton at September 02, 2009 12:08 PM | Email Thisriiight, when it is conservatives dbags, due to their own hatred or intolerance towards gays and lesbians, that are pushing for the denial of equal rights. can you guys get any more hypocritical? i didn’t think it was possible.
for all you a**hats that claim anything the left does denies your rights, this sure is friggin rich.
i look forward to the day your movement finally flails.
The kneejerk fringe left line is to claim "racism" whenever anyone is smart enough to oppose the policies of that empty suited, Anti-American racist bigot you people elected; or to claim "bigotry" whenever anyone opposes the gay agenda.
YOUR declaration, that somehow to be a liberal absolutely precludes you from practicing bigotry just serves to confirm my initial observation: name calling and kool aid drinking is all you've got.
As for "my" movement "flails?"[sic]
What say you hold your breath until that happens, OK?
Thanks. Much appreciated, dilwad.
Posted by: Hinton on September 2, 2009 04:01 PMcan you be any more hypocritical? i think not.
and like i said, conservative movement is in it's last throes, especially w/ asinine referendums like this.
all we have are name calling and kool aid? funny, i remember conservatives being handed a rather dubious a** whooping last election after 8 years of conservative lies, hypocrisy, fearmongering and dbaggery. you really think americans want that again? man your parents must have been proud of you.
Posted by: mike on September 2, 2009 04:55 PMFYI...The majority of the American people are waking up to what a Lying Farce Obama is. His poll ratings are down in the low forties.
gays aren't criminals.
and gay sex ain't criminal, otherwise you'd be in jail, dannny-boy.
face it, you are a bigot. and a liar. btw, ref. 71 ain't even about gay marriage. but i'm willing to bet you are too ignorant to even know that.
Posted by: mike on September 2, 2009 09:30 PMit's not about gay marriage, it's about domestic partnership rights. the bill specifically states it is not marriage. furthermore, they already were granted these rights, the referendum is an attempt to repeal them.
that you would keep gays and lesbians from visiting their partners in the hospital speaks volumes about your intolerance and inability to follow your own god's teachings. domestic partnership is not marriage, clown.
what is it like living life in a shroud of hypocrisy, hatred and intolerance, daniel?
but if you really think civil rights should be an issue of popular vote, there are a few rights conservatives should probably have rolled back. that work for you, clown?
Posted by: mike on September 2, 2009 11:04 PMyou're just a bigot concerned only w/ denigrating the rights of fellow citizens. so gay partners shouldn't be able to visit each other in the hospital? do you really believe that? what a moron.
so not only can't you follow the Word, you can't follow the constitution. wowsers. keep pushing that intolerance and hatred, daniel. it will get you far in life w/ your neo-nazi brethren.
Posted by: mike on September 3, 2009 07:14 AMit is, actually, about hospital visitation rights. it's about granting gay partners and straight elderly domestic partners the same rights granted to married couples. lots of non-religious and even anti-religious couples are afforded these rights. all i asked was if you thought gays should be afforded soem of those rights. i forgot you lack the ability to think, just lying and misrepresenting the word of god.
these are a few of the rights that gays were granted and you want to repeal because you are a bigot:
• The right to use sick leave to care for a domestic partner.
• The right to wages and benefits when a domestic partner is injured, and to unpaid wages upon the death of a domestic partner. ¦ The right to unemployment and disability insurance benefits.
• The right to workers' compensation coverage.
• Insurance rights, including rights under group policies, policy rights after the death of a domestic partner, conversion rights and continuing coverage rights.
• Rights related to adoption, child custody and child support.
• Business succession rights.
wow, daniel... why am i not surprised you haven't bothered to read the bill.
you are an even bigger bigot than i thought, some real intolerance for your fellow man, there. jesus is uber proud.
also, is being entirely hypocritical your favorite past time? or does being an insufferable, intolerant bigot come naturally to someone like you?
obviously you don't understand the meaning of the bill if you think it gives gay domestic partners rights that straight dating couples don't have. you're an idiot. you're a bigot. you've got zero standing in my eyes, and probably in god's. righteous!
i know you are an intellectual giant. gays should have the same rights as heteros because we are all americans, dumbass.
and if you are honestly saying gays shouldn't have the same rights as heteros, you are a friggin idiot (nothing new there...)
btw, studies show it costs MORE money to deny gays their rights.
i know facts don't matter to you and history is too difficult to comprehend.
i look forward to when the state laughs at your bigotry and hatred and overwhlemingly supports gay rights.
Posted by: mike on September 3, 2009 12:03 PMand you are right, the blatant hypocrisy and denial of reality on this site has been too much for me. but then again, it would be too much for any rational person.
still not convinced you are a bigot?
btw, here is your study on the positive economic impact of legalizing gay marriage:
http://law.ucla.edu/WilliamsInstitute/publications/washington%20econ%20study.pdf
Bravo! You've done a great job!
The simple truth is this: the anti-marriage folks behind R-71 want to keep some people from forming households because of their own beliefs. If I were to be part of your (sick and twisted) religion, then sure, your church could refuse to bless that wedding. Until everyone joins your (hateful and evil) religion, though, I'd prefer not to be governed by its rules. I have my own God, thank you very much... and apparently He isn't a complete dick like your god is.
Posted by: demo kid on September 4, 2009 08:54 AMyou aren't going to get into heaven with that attitude. and dontcha find it highly ironic calling liberals easy believers, when you believe in a non-existent god? hilarious.
you mean science and art and history are a drag on society? man, your world view is seriously confusing, daniel.
Posted by: mike on September 4, 2009 09:10 AMYour god appears to be satan since you are for the Killing of millions of babies for starters. If that isn't twisted, I don't what is. You and mike seem to be a pair, joining hands as you slip into damnation.
your god must be inktomi, the lakota god of deceit.
cos it's certainly not the christian one w/ your lies, haughtiness, etc. in fact, i would say your attitude is devoutly anti-christian. in fact, you may even be an atheist like me!
Posted by: mike on September 4, 2009 09:31 AM