February 04, 2010
Toyota Recall - A Double Standard?

I have watched with a certain amount of amazement the recent recall of Toyota automobiles due to a "sticky" accelerator problem. The press has crucified Toyota over this matter. Today, due to one consumer's experience, the press is questioning whether the problem could be electronic or due to software, rather than simply the mechanical cause to which Toyota is now admitting. US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood even announced today that people should not drive their affected Toyotas until fixed, sending Toyota stock into a further downward spiral. He later recanted that position.

This is a serious problem, and it needs to be fixed. However, uncommon intermittent problems do take time to identify and resolve. Toyota, in my opinion, took the high moral ground by admitting there was a problem, and very publically proceeded to stop sales until the issue was identified and solved.

Toyota is known for quality, not perfection. Man-made machines will always have problems, including those made by Toyota and Rolls Royce. My confidence in Toyota is not shaken, because when they identified a problem they were willing to put the company at significant financial risk to resolve it. In public. I admire that.

Compare this to Ford.

I own a 1994 Econoline E150 Club Wagon van. On Thanksgiving weekend of 2008, with 165,000 miles, it had a catastrophic failure of the frame and steering box. My family, six of us plus the dog, were driving on a steep narrow winding icy mountain road at Mount Baker, in Washington state. As we prepared to park near the ski lodge, something in the steering went snap. At that point the steering wheel turned freely, without the corresponding turning of the tires. The bolts that attach the steering box to the frame completely sheared off, rendering the steering completely useless. Had this happened moments sooner or later than it did, we would all be dead. The good Lord must have paid His guardian angels overtime on that day.

Investigation showed that the frame was full of cracks, especially around the bolt holes, and the structural failure of the frame led to increased pressure and torque on the steering box; eventually the bolts failed.

I filed a report with Ford and with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). A search for similar events found many occurrences of the same identical failure have been reported to the NHTSA. Some included serious injury. Yet there is no recall. In fact, neither the NHTSA nor Ford will even acknowledge that there was/is a problem. My report is found here.

It is my guess that such failures have happened without this cause being identified. Assume that such a steering failure leads to a high speed front-end or head-on crash. Such a crash would normally rip the steering box away from the frame. How many of these have been ruled a result of a crash rather than the cause? How many people may have died, and the accident report has mistakenly assumed that the driver fell asleep or failed to pay proper attention?

All I want is for Ford to acknowledge my problem, and launch an inspection of similar vehicles. So far, they have only tried to sell me a new vehicle. At this point, I will never own another Ford again.

I wonder what Toyota would have done in my case?

Posted by 6p01287673a6f7970c at February 04, 2010 10:42 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Yes, because a 14 year old van with 165,000 miles is exactly like a 6 month old car with fewer than 5,000 miles on it...

Posted by: Excuse me? on February 4, 2010 11:59 AM
2. Mechanical components should wear out over time. Major structural components, such as the frame, should not fail after a mere 165,000 miles or 14 years.

A search of this problem finds many events, even when the vehicle was nearly new.

Posted by: Seabecker on February 4, 2010 12:07 PM
3. This is a case of the Obama administration trying to bash Toyota. It's theatre for ratings, basically. I hadn't recalled any time that they pulled this kind of stuff on American companies with other kinds of bad problems. Your cited example is amazing.

Posted by: Michele on February 4, 2010 02:23 PM
4. #1: lol--around this house, a car with 165,000 miles on it is known as a younger car. We don't ditch them just because they hit 50k. We buy them at 50k used. Frankly, I have a 1993 Honda Accord with 290,000 miles on it and have never had anything as dangerous as described on that 1994 Ford happen. That is not to be expected and shouldn't have happened.

Posted by: Michele on February 4, 2010 02:26 PM
5. My take on it - Toyota has hundreds of thousands, potentially millions of vehicles with a proven issue. The E150 frame failure is apparently many, but is that 3, 4, a dozen?

The difference is the scope of failure. When you make literally hundreds of thousands of a model every year (the E150 is basically an F150 truck with a van body on it, something Ford sells a tens of thousands of every month), you'll get some failures over time. Is it terrible? Yes, but it's also the real world - nothing lasts forever.

So how many E150s have this failure? What's the rate of failures? If we're talking dozens over 14 years it's basically a non-issue; it's a terrible failure, but worthy of recall?

Posted by: Shanghai Dan on February 4, 2010 03:45 PM
6. This toyota thing is all a big conspiracy.
Big Government is just trying to prop up Government Motors.
Notice how all this toyota nonsence started right after Government Motors started its commercials comparing itself to Toyota?

Yeah, that's just a coincidence!
Well, we can connect the dots can't we.

Posted by: Dufus McBroke on February 4, 2010 05:44 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?